South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 06 September 2026

Gwangju vs Anyang: match statistics

Gwangju crest
Gwangju
2 : 5half-time 0:3
Anyang crest
Anyang

Gwangju vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gwangju played Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:5.

Current form

Gwangju: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Anyang: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gwangju scores 0.56 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Anyang scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gwangju 33%, Anyang 78%. Over 2.5: Gwangju 44%, Anyang 22%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Anyang has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.04. Gwangju: 8.2 shots per match, Anyang: 9.4.

Match halves

Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33. Anyang: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Gwangju: 61-75 (2 goals). Anyang: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.24 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 1.75, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gwangju has 0 points in the last 5 matches, losing all 5 and conceding 15 goals in that period (3.0 per match), while Anyang over the last 5 has a 1-3-1 record, averaging 1.2 points per match and conceding 4 goals (0.8 per match). Across the season Gwangju have scored only 5 and conceded 18, whereas Anyang have scored 9 and conceded 9, giving the visitors a clear advantage in goal balance (9 vs 5) and a superior defence (9 conceded vs 18). In situational stats Anyang average 9.6 shots per away match versus Gwangju’s 8.33 at home and register 3.6 shots on target vs 3.33, with similar conversion rates (10% vs 12%), which suggests more created chances by the visitors. Gwangju have failed to score in 67% of home matches, while Anyang have 0% such games away, so the visitors are more consistent at finding the net on the road. Considering Gwangju’s five-game losing run, Anyang’s better goal stats and stability, I favour an away win (50%), estimate a draw at 35% and a home win at 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators suggest BTTS — Gwangju 75% and Anyang 80% with a league average BTTS 54% — which on the surface favors Both Teams To Score. However, the hosts’ current form is very poor: in the last 5 matches Gwangju have only 20% BTTS, scored a total of 1 goal (0.2 per match) and conceded 15 goals (3.0 per match), with results string lllll. Visitors Anyang in their last 5 matches have 60% BTTS, scored 4 goals (0.8 per match) and conceded 4 (0.8 per match), and season xG for Anyang is 1.23 versus xG against 1.83, showing they create chances but are also susceptible to conceding. Over the season Gwangju have scored 5 and conceded 18, while Anyang have 9 scored and 9 conceded, which further confirms the hosts’ attacking problems. Given Gwangju’s extremely low efficiency in form (0.2 goals per match and only 20% BTTS in the last 5), I recommend a 'No' bet with a 65% probability versus 35% for 'Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG I project 1.49 goals for Gwangju (xG_for 1.15 vs xG_against Anyang 1.83 → (1.15+1.83)/2=1.49) and 1.29 goals for Anyang (xG_for 1.23 vs xG_against Gwangju 1.35 → (1.23+1.35)/2=1.29), totaling 2.78 goals. In the last 5 matches Gwangju conceded an average of 3.0 goals (15 conceded in 5 matches), while Anyang scored 4 goals in that period, which increases the risk of a higher-scoring game. Seasonally both teams have a high rate of both teams scoring: Gwangju 75% and Anyang 80%, and Over 1.5 occurred in 75% and 80% of their matches respectively, which strongly supports a bet on at least 2 goals. Although the season share of matches over 2.5 is low (25% for the home team, 20% for the away team), Gwangju’s last 5 matches show Over 2.5 in 60% of cases, and the cumulative xG of 2.78 gives a moderate signal for Over 2.5. Considering the above figures, I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal to back.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-Time statistics point to a draw: Gwangju led at the break in 25% of matches (25.0), Anyang never led HT (0.0), and the percentage of half-time draws is 50% for the home side and 100% for the away side. First-half goals are low on average: Gwangju scores 0.25 goals HT, Anyang 0.4 goals HT, and seasonal clean sheets at the break are 75% (home) vs 60% (away), increasing the likelihood of a goalless or low-scoring draw after 45 minutes. Over the full match a draw also looks strong — season draw rates are 50% for Gwangju and 60% for Anyang, with xG 1.15 (Gwangju) vs 1.23 (Anyang) and higher xG against for Anyang 1.83 vs 1.35 for the home side, indicating many chances but no clear favourite. Recent form over the last 5 matches reinforces a points-sharing forecast: Gwangju form 'lllll' (5 losses), Anyang 'lddwd' (1 loss, 3 draws, 1 win), so the visitors tend to share points more often than secure big wins; therefore the primary scenario is draw at half-time and draw at full-time (X/X, 38%), with significant variants X/2 (18%) and X/1 (13%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
GwangjuAnyang
15Shots13
GwangjuAnyang
5Shots on target12
GwangjuAnyang
1.94xG2.07
GwangjuAnyang
4Corners2
GwangjuAnyang
89Dangerous attacks56
GwangjuAnyang
10Fouls14
GwangjuAnyang
5Cards3
GwangjuAnyang

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.56Goals scored / match1
GwangjuAnyang
2Goals conceded / match1
GwangjuAnyang
49%Average possession39%
GwangjuAnyang
2.44Shots on target / match3.44
GwangjuAnyang

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.22Shots per match9.44
GwangjuAnyang
2.44Shots on target3.44
GwangjuAnyang
6.8%Shot conversion10.6%
GwangjuAnyang
49%Possession39%
GwangjuAnyang
1.04xG for1.19
GwangjuAnyang
1.66xG against1.62
GwangjuAnyang

Shooting quality

Gwangju: BalancedAnyang: Balanced
GwangjuAnyang
Accuracy (shots on target)30%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gwangju
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W33% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-5
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
WDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Anyang
LDDWD
Season result split
22% W56% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-2
1.22 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Anyang is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

0.56 goals / match - Gwangju · 1 goals / match - Anyang

Anyang is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Gwangju · 1 goals / match - Anyang

Gwangju scoring profile: mixed

Gwangju scores in 33% of matches (3 of 9 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

Anyang scoring profile: very strong

Anyang scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

5Goals scored (season)9
GwangjuAnyang
18Goals conceded (season)9
GwangjuAnyang
2.56Average goals in match2
GwangjuAnyang
1Goals scored (last 5)4
GwangjuAnyang
15Goals conceded (last 5)4
GwangjuAnyang

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal89%
GwangjuAnyang
11%2 goals11%
GwangjuAnyang
11%3 goals0%
GwangjuAnyang
0%4 goals0%
GwangjuAnyang

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal89%
GwangjuAnyang
44%2 goals11%
GwangjuAnyang
33%3 goals0%
GwangjuAnyang
22%4 goals0%
GwangjuAnyang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
GwangjuAnyang
11%BTTS in both halves0%
GwangjuAnyang
11%Scored in both halves0%
GwangjuAnyang

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
GwangjuAnyang
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GwangjuAnyang
20%BTTS - last 560%
GwangjuAnyang

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
GwangjuAnyang
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
GwangjuAnyang
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
GwangjuAnyang

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
GwangjuAnyang
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
GwangjuAnyang
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
GwangjuAnyang

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Anyang is 98% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.56 pts / match - Gwangju · 1.11 pts / match - Anyang

Gwangju - half-time state
0% leading56% draw44% trailing
Anyang - half-time state
11% leading78% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.56Points per match (1st half)1.11
GwangjuAnyang
0.22Goals scored (1st half)0.33
GwangjuAnyang
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
GwangjuAnyang
1Average goals (1st half)0.67
GwangjuAnyang
44%Clean sheet before half-time67%
GwangjuAnyang
78%No goal before half-time67%
GwangjuAnyang

After half-time (2nd half)

0.78Points per match (2nd half)1.33
GwangjuAnyang
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
GwangjuAnyang
1.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
GwangjuAnyang
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.33
GwangjuAnyang
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
GwangjuAnyang
78%No goal after half-time44%
GwangjuAnyang

Gwangju - second-half results

11% W44% R44% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.56
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Anyang - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gwangju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-5-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Anyang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gwangju
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Anyang
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gwangju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
179%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Anyang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

GwangjuLigaAnyang
Average goals in match 2.562.24 2.00
Both teams scored 33%53% 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%36% 22%
Clean sheets 22%28% 11%
Goal before half-time 56%66% 44%
Goal after half-time 67%76% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.24
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GwangjuYellow cardMin-seo Moon
  2. GwangjuYellow cardBae-hyeon Gong
  3. AnyangGoalJeong-Hyun KimAssist: Ji-Hoon Kang
  4. AnyangYellow cardThomas Oude Kotte
  5. GwangjuYellow cardMin-Ki Lee
  6. AnyangSubstitutionOn: Tae-Hee LeeOff: Hyun-Woo Ju
  7. AnyangSubstitutionOn: York RafaelOff: Jeong-Hun Park
  8. AnyangSubstitutionOn: Woon KimOff: Breno Herculano Almeida
  9. GwangjuYellow cardSeungun Ha
  10. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Yong-Jun HongOff: Hyeok-Ju Ahn
  11. AnyangYellow cardJeong-Hoon Kim
  12. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Sang-Ki MinOff: Bae-hyeon Gong
  13. AnyangGoalWoon Kim
  14. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Sung-Hun KwakOff: Se-Jong Ju
  15. AnyangYellow cardYork Rafael
  16. GwangjuYellow cardHólmbert Aron Fridjonsson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Gwangju 3 - 1 - 0 Anyang. Average goals 1.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Gwangju FC
1 : 0
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
0 : 0
Gwangju FC
FC Anyang
1 : 2
Gwangju FC
Gwangju FC
2 : 1
FC Anyang

FAQ

What was the result of Gwangju vs Anyang?

The K League 1 match finished Gwangju 2:5 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gwangju and Anyang?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gwangju won 3, Anyang won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gwangju vs Anyang?

Gwangju score 0.56 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.00. The K League 1 average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Gwangju's matches and 78% of Anyang's.

What form are Gwangju and Anyang in?

Over the last 5 games Gwangju have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Anyang 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gwangju vs Anyang?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gwangju vs Anyang: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.