Gwangju vs Anyang: match statistics
Gwangju vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gwangju played Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:5.
Current form
Gwangju: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Anyang: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gwangju scores 0.56 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Anyang scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.24 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gwangju 33%, Anyang 78%. Over 2.5: Gwangju 44%, Anyang 22%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
Anyang has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.04. Gwangju: 8.2 shots per match, Anyang: 9.4.
Match halves
Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33. Anyang: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Gwangju: 61-75 (2 goals). Anyang: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.24 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 1.75, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gwangju has 0 points in the last 5 matches, losing all 5 and conceding 15 goals in that period (3.0 per match), while Anyang over the last 5 has a 1-3-1 record, averaging 1.2 points per match and conceding 4 goals (0.8 per match). Across the season Gwangju have scored only 5 and conceded 18, whereas Anyang have scored 9 and conceded 9, giving the visitors a clear advantage in goal balance (9 vs 5) and a superior defence (9 conceded vs 18). In situational stats Anyang average 9.6 shots per away match versus Gwangju’s 8.33 at home and register 3.6 shots on target vs 3.33, with similar conversion rates (10% vs 12%), which suggests more created chances by the visitors. Gwangju have failed to score in 67% of home matches, while Anyang have 0% such games away, so the visitors are more consistent at finding the net on the road. Considering Gwangju’s five-game losing run, Anyang’s better goal stats and stability, I favour an away win (50%), estimate a draw at 35% and a home win at 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators suggest BTTS — Gwangju 75% and Anyang 80% with a league average BTTS 54% — which on the surface favors Both Teams To Score. However, the hosts’ current form is very poor: in the last 5 matches Gwangju have only 20% BTTS, scored a total of 1 goal (0.2 per match) and conceded 15 goals (3.0 per match), with results string lllll. Visitors Anyang in their last 5 matches have 60% BTTS, scored 4 goals (0.8 per match) and conceded 4 (0.8 per match), and season xG for Anyang is 1.23 versus xG against 1.83, showing they create chances but are also susceptible to conceding. Over the season Gwangju have scored 5 and conceded 18, while Anyang have 9 scored and 9 conceded, which further confirms the hosts’ attacking problems. Given Gwangju’s extremely low efficiency in form (0.2 goals per match and only 20% BTTS in the last 5), I recommend a 'No' bet with a 65% probability versus 35% for 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I project 1.49 goals for Gwangju (xG_for 1.15 vs xG_against Anyang 1.83 → (1.15+1.83)/2=1.49) and 1.29 goals for Anyang (xG_for 1.23 vs xG_against Gwangju 1.35 → (1.23+1.35)/2=1.29), totaling 2.78 goals. In the last 5 matches Gwangju conceded an average of 3.0 goals (15 conceded in 5 matches), while Anyang scored 4 goals in that period, which increases the risk of a higher-scoring game. Seasonally both teams have a high rate of both teams scoring: Gwangju 75% and Anyang 80%, and Over 1.5 occurred in 75% and 80% of their matches respectively, which strongly supports a bet on at least 2 goals. Although the season share of matches over 2.5 is low (25% for the home team, 20% for the away team), Gwangju’s last 5 matches show Over 2.5 in 60% of cases, and the cumulative xG of 2.78 gives a moderate signal for Over 2.5. Considering the above figures, I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal to back.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-Time statistics point to a draw: Gwangju led at the break in 25% of matches (25.0), Anyang never led HT (0.0), and the percentage of half-time draws is 50% for the home side and 100% for the away side. First-half goals are low on average: Gwangju scores 0.25 goals HT, Anyang 0.4 goals HT, and seasonal clean sheets at the break are 75% (home) vs 60% (away), increasing the likelihood of a goalless or low-scoring draw after 45 minutes. Over the full match a draw also looks strong — season draw rates are 50% for Gwangju and 60% for Anyang, with xG 1.15 (Gwangju) vs 1.23 (Anyang) and higher xG against for Anyang 1.83 vs 1.35 for the home side, indicating many chances but no clear favourite. Recent form over the last 5 matches reinforces a points-sharing forecast: Gwangju form 'lllll' (5 losses), Anyang 'lddwd' (1 loss, 3 draws, 1 win), so the visitors tend to share points more often than secure big wins; therefore the primary scenario is draw at half-time and draw at full-time (X/X, 38%), with significant variants X/2 (18%) and X/1 (13%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gwangju | Anyang | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Anyang is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
0.56 goals / match - Gwangju · 1 goals / match - Anyang
Anyang is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - Gwangju · 1 goals / match - Anyang
Gwangju scores in 33% of matches (3 of 9 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
Anyang scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gwangju
Over / Under - Anyang
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Anyang is 98% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.56 pts / match - Gwangju · 1.11 pts / match - Anyang
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gwangju - second-half results
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Anyang - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gwangju
Anyang
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gwangju | Liga | Anyang | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.56 | 2.24 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 53% | ▲ 78% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 36% | ▼ 22% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 28% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 66% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Gwangju 3 - 1 - 0 Anyang. Average goals 1.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gwangju vs Anyang?
The K League 1 match finished Gwangju 2:5 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gwangju and Anyang?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gwangju won 3, Anyang won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gwangju vs Anyang?
Gwangju score 0.56 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.00. The K League 1 average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Gwangju's matches and 78% of Anyang's.
What form are Gwangju and Anyang in?
Over the last 5 games Gwangju have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Anyang 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gwangju vs Anyang?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gwangju vs Anyang: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


