Gyeongnam vs Gimhae City: match statistics
Gyeongnam vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gyeongnam played Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Gyeongnam: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Gimhae City: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gyeongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.67 and concedes 2.33. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gyeongnam 56%, Gimhae City 67%. Over 2.5: Gyeongnam 44%, Gimhae City 56%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Gimhae City has higher xG: 1.20 vs 1.05. Gyeongnam: 9.1 shots per match, Gimhae City: 9.6.
Match halves
Gyeongnam: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.56. Gimhae City: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (3 goals). Gimhae City: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Gyeongnam averages 1.0 goals scored and concedes 1.8 goals per home match, while Gimhae averages 0.8 goals scored and concedes 2.2 goals on the road, giving the hosts an edge in attacking efficiency and defensive stability. Gyeongnam’s home record is 2 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses, whereas Gimhae’s away record is 0 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses, and the visitors have 0% clean sheets away, which favors the hosts. Gimhae have higher xG at 1.16 versus the hosts’ 0.97 and more shots on target (3.6 vs 2.8), but a lower shot conversion rate (9% vs 12%), meaning they create chances but finish poorly; additionally the visitors have conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches compared to 8 for the hosts. In the last 5 fixtures the hosts scored 5 goals and average 0.8 points per game, while the visitors scored 4 goals and average 0.4 points per game, therefore I assess probabilities as 60% home, 25% draw and 15% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because Gimhae City has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Gyeongnam sits at 50% seasonally and 60% in the last 5 — a clear signal (roughly 65–70% on average) in favor of both teams scoring. Both sides concede frequently: Gyeongnam allows 2.5 goals/match on average this season, Gimhae 2.2, and in the last 5 matches average goals conceded are 1.6 and 2.0 respectively. In xG terms the hosts have xG 1.26 versus xG against 1.73, and the visitors xG 1.16 versus xG against 1.65, indicating both teams create chances while also being vulnerable to conceding. The league BTTS rate is 63% and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, which further supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering the teams’ seasonal BTTS of 50%/80%, 60%/80% in the last 5, and the high goals-conceded rates, I estimate BTTS probability at ~68% and No at 32%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG levels suggest a total close to 2.90: home xG_for=1.26, away xG_for=1.16, with xG against 1.73 (Gyeongnam) and 1.65 (Gimhae), which averaged yields expected goals of 1.46 for the home side and 1.44 for the visitors (total 2.90). Seasonal indicators give a strong signal for Over 1.5 – it occurred in 75% of home matches and 100% of away matches – and a moderate signal for Over 2.5 (75% at home vs 40% away), while Over 3.5 is less frequent (25%/40%). Hosts score on average 0.5 goals per game, visitors 0.8, but both teams also concede frequently: 2.5 (home) and 2.2 (away), which combined with high xG and 100% of matches featuring at least one conceded goal increases the probability of more than 1.5 goals. Additionally, BTTS occurred in 50% of home matches and 80% of away matches, and shots on target of 2.75 (home) vs 3.6 (away) indicate numerous chances; low shot conversion rates (5% and 9%) limit the likelihood of very high scores, so I assess Over 3.5 at about 30%. Based on this I recommend betting Over 1.5 (strongest signal) with estimated probabilities: Over 1.5 ~85%, Over 2.5 ~60%, Over 3.5 ~30%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back HT/FT X/1 (draw at the break, home win): in 3 of the last 5 matches the home side were level at the break (60% in the last 5), and the home team averaged 0.6 goals by half-time versus 0.0 for the visitors. The home side also hold a slight advantage in chance creation: home xG is 1.26 versus 1.16 for the opponents and they average 10.75 shots per game versus 8.6, which increases their likelihood of deciding the match within 90 minutes. Over the last 5 matches the home team records 0.8 points per game versus 0.4 for the visitors and have a 20% win rate in this sample versus 0% for the away side, further supporting a home win outcome. However, it should be noted the visitors are more dangerous after the break (on average 0.8 goals and 5 points gained in second halves versus 2 points for the home team), therefore I expect a draw at the break and a narrow home victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gyeongnam | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gyeongnam is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 0.4 pts / match - Gimhae City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gyeongnam is 49% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 0.67 goals / match - Gimhae City
Gyeongnam is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 2.33 goals / match - Gimhae City
Gyeongnam scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 9 matches).
Gimhae City scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gyeongnam
Over / Under - Gimhae City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gyeongnam is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.78 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 0.44 pts / match - Gimhae City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Gimhae City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -6 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gyeongnam
Gimhae City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gyeongnam | Liga | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.67 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 61% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 54% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 24% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 77% | ▲ 89% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- GyeongnamYellow cardWoo-young Cho
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Gimhae City?
The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 2:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Gimhae City?
Gyeongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.67. The K League 2 average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Gyeongnam's matches and 67% of Gimhae City's.
What form are Gyeongnam and Gimhae City in?
Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Gimhae City 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Gimhae City?
The statistical background for Gyeongnam vs Gimhae City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


