South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 13 September 2026

Gyeongnam vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
120%(3.75)
X25%(3.35)
255%(2.07)

Gimpo Citizen demonstrates significantly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors boast a 100% win rate on the road (2 wins from 2 matches) and a positive goal difference of +3, while Gyeongnam has failed to win any home matches (0% wins, 50% draws, 50% losses) and has a negative goal difference of -3. Gimpo Citizen dominates key metrics: an average of 7 shots on target per away game versus the hosts' 3, 53% possession compared to 37%, and a far superior xG (1.76 vs 0.83). Furthermore, the visitors score an average of 2 goals per away match and concede only 0.5, whereas Gyeongnam scores 1.5 and concedes as many as 3 goals per home game. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors the away side (2.0 PPG vs 1.4 PPG), making a Gimpo Citizen victory the most probable outcome.

Gyeongnam vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gyeongnam played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Gyeongnam: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gyeongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 2.00 and concedes 0.50. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gyeongnam 67%, Gimpo Citizen 50%. Over 2.5: Gyeongnam 67%, Gimpo Citizen 50%. League level: BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.76 vs 0.86. Gyeongnam: 7.0 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 13.5.

Match halves

Gyeongnam: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Gyeongnam: 0-15 (1 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimpo Citizen demonstrates significantly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors boast a 100% win rate on the road (2 wins from 2 matches) and a positive goal difference of +3, while Gyeongnam has failed to win any home matches (0% wins, 50% draws, 50% losses) and has a negative goal difference of -3. Gimpo Citizen dominates key metrics: an average of 7 shots on target per away game versus the hosts' 3, 53% possession compared to 37%, and a far superior xG (1.76 vs 0.83). Furthermore, the visitors score an average of 2 goals per away match and concede only 0.5, whereas Gyeongnam scores 1.5 and concedes as many as 3 goals per home game. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors the away side (2.0 PPG vs 1.4 PPG), making a Gimpo Citizen victory the most probable outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
8Shots13
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Shots on target4
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.8xG1.62
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
1Corners10
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
20Dangerous attacks72
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
16Fouls11
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Cards0
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
1Goals scored / match2
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
2.33Goals conceded / match0.5
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
42%Average possession53%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
2.33Shots on target / match7
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match13.5
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
2.33Shots on target7
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
14.3%Shot conversion14.8%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
42%Possession53%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.86xG for1.76
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.34xG against1.03
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Gyeongnam: Counter-attackingGimpo Citizen: Efficient finishing
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)33%52%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimpo Citizen is 809% better for: last-5 form.

0.33 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 3 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gyeongnam
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 0.86Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Gimpo Citizen
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 2 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 366% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.33 goals / match - Gyeongnam · 0.5 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gyeongnam scoring profile: mixed

Gyeongnam scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

3Goals scored (season)4
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
7Goals conceded (season)1
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
3.33Average goals in match2.5
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
3Goals scored (last 5)4
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)1
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%2 goals50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%3 goals50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%2 goals0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%3 goals0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%4 goals0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

68%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Scored in both halves50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%BTTS - last 550%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Gyeongnam · 2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gyeongnam - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.33Goals scored (1st half)1
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.5
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Clean sheet before half-time50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%No goal before half-time50%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.33Points per match (2nd half)3
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Average goals (2nd half)1
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Clean sheet after half-time100%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%No goal after half-time0%
GyeongnamGimpo Citizen

Gyeongnam - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gyeongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.33
Goals scored / match0.30.7
Goals conceded / match1.01.3
Average goals in match1.32.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals0%67%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.99
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

GyeongnamLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 3.333.13 2.50
Both teams scored 67%68% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%65% 50%
Clean sheets 0%19% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%87% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%77% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
68%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.65
Away goals / match
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Jin-Hyuk ChoOff: Il-Lok Yun
  2. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Oh KimOff: Ki-Pyo Kwon
  3. GyeongnamGoalHyeon-Oh Kim
  4. GyeongnamYellow cardHo-Jun Son
  5. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Jun-Ho KimOff: Ha-Min Kim
  6. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Sun-Ho KimOff: Ki-Jong Won
  7. GyeongnamYellow cardHyun-Seo Bae

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Gyeongnam 1 - 0 - 2 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Gyeongnam FC
0 : 2
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
3 : 0
Gyeongnam FC
Gyeongnam FC
2 : 1
Gimpo Citizen FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 1:0 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gyeongnam and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Gyeongnam won 1, Gimpo Citizen won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

Gyeongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 2.00. The K League 2 average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Gyeongnam's matches and 50% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Gyeongnam and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gyeongnam vs Gimpo Citizen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.