Győri ETO vs Diósgyőr: match statistics
Győri ETO vs Diósgyőr: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Győri ETO played Diósgyőr in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Győri ETO: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Diósgyőr: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Győri ETO scores 1.94 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Diósgyőr scores 1.23 and concedes 1.87. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Győri ETO 58%, Diósgyőr 71%. Over 2.5: Győri ETO 48%, Diósgyőr 65%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Győri ETO has higher xG: 1.98 vs 1.23. Győri ETO: 16.6 shots per match, Diósgyőr: 11.2.
Match halves
Győri ETO: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.03. Diósgyőr: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Győri ETO: 61-75 (15 goals). Diósgyőr: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB I: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Győri ETO are clear favorites: they have scored 60 and conceded 30 across the season, concede only 0.6 goals per match at home and keep a clean sheet in 53% of home games, whereas Diósgyőr concede 2.13 goals on the road and have no away clean sheets (0%). The hosts generate on average 2.07 xG and 5.87 shots on target per home match with 61% possession, while the visitors have only 1.19 xG, 3.38 shots on target and 45% possession away, indicating a home advantage in chance creation and quality. Form also favors ETO: in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 9 goals, with a record of 3 wins and 2 draws and 2.2 points per game, whereas Diósgyőr scored 5 goals, lost 4 of their last 5 and average only 0.6 points per game while conceding 14 goals. The gap in defensive efficiency and game control (0.6 vs 2.13 conceded; 61% vs 45% possession) is decisive and suggests the hosts should dominate and limit the visitors’ opportunities. Based on this, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Diósgyőr has a seasonal BTTS rate of 81% (last 5 matches 80%), while Győri ETO sits at 60% (last 5: 60%), against a league average of 60%, which already favors a Both Teams To Score scenario. Over the season Győri averages 1.2 goals scored and concedes 1.6, whereas Diósgyőr scores 1.25 and concedes 2.13; additionally in the last 5 matches Diósgyőr concedes 2.8 on average versus 0.8 for Győri, so the visitors’ weaker defense increases the likelihood of a home goal. xG indicates both teams create chances (xG 1.26 for Győri vs 1.19 for Diósgyőr) and shots on target are comparable (3.4 vs 3.38), meaning both sides have realistic scoring opportunities. Furthermore Diósgyőr has 0% clean sheets this season and 69% of matches with simultaneous over 2.5 and BTTS, while Győri has 20% clean sheets and 33% over+BTTS, suggesting the visitors frequently participate in games with both teams scoring. On this basis I assign 78% to 'BTTS - Yes' and 22% to 'No', because the strong BTTS signals from Diósgyőr (81%/80%) and comparable xG and SOT outweigh the hosts' moderate defensive form.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimated expected goals as the average between each team’s attacking xG and the opponent’s xG against: for Győri ETO (1.26 + 1.75)/2 = 1.50, for Diósgyőr (1.19 + 1.39)/2 = 1.29, total 2.79. Seasonal indicators give a strong signal for Over 1.5 — Győri has 87% of matches over 1.5 goals, Diósgyőr 94%, with both teams showing 93% and 100% of matches with at least 0.5 goals. For the 2.5 line the seasonal over rate is 53% (home) and 75% (away), and in the last 5 matches Diósgyőr had 100% Over 2.5 and conceded 14 goals (avg 2.8), so I rate Over 2.5 at 68%. The 3.5 line is less certain — seasonally Over 3.5 is 40% (home) and 50% (away), with a low share of matches where teams individually exceeded 3.5 goals (only 7% and 6%), so I give Over 3.5 42%. I choose Over 1.5 (line 1.5) as the strongest signal because the high frequency of Over 1.5 (87% vs 94%), expected 2.79 goals and Diósgyőr’s poor recent defensive form (2.8 conceded avg in L5) provide a clear edge for the Over side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 as the strongest scenario: Győri ETO led at the break in 60% of their last 5 matches (3 of 5) and averaged 1.0 goals by half-time, while Diósgyőr averaged 0.6 goals by half-time over their last 5. After 90 minutes the home side also shows superior form — in the last 5 matches Győri averaged 1.8 goals and had a 60% win rate, versus Diósgyőr’s 1.0 goals and 20% win rate. Defensively the visitors are weaker: over the season they concede 2.13 goals on average with 1.75 xG against, compared to the hosts conceding 1.6 goals and 1.39 xG against, which increases the likelihood of the home side maintaining a lead at the break. The second half frequently produces goals (in second halves the hosts recorded >0.5 goals in 93% of games, the visitors in 94%), however the data points more to additional scoring rather than a turnaround, hence 1/1 is most probable, with X/1 a reasonable alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Győri ETO | Diósgyőr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Győri ETO is 333% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Győri ETO · 0.6 pts / match - Diósgyőr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Győri ETO is 58% better for: goals scored per match.
1.94 goals / match - Győri ETO · 1.23 goals / match - Diósgyőr
Győri ETO is 93% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.97 goals / match - Győri ETO · 1.87 goals / match - Diósgyőr
Győri ETO scores in 87% of matches (27 of 31 matches), while Diósgyőr keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 matches).
Diósgyőr scores in 77% of matches (24 of 31 matches), while Győri ETO keeps a clean sheet in 35% (11 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Győri ETO
Over / Under - Diósgyőr
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Győri ETO is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.94 pts / match - Győri ETO · 1.42 pts / match - Diósgyőr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Győri ETO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Diósgyőr - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Győri ETO
Diósgyőr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| Győri ETO | Liga | Diósgyőr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.90 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 60% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 58% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 22% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 69% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 84% | 87% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Győri ETO 1 - 1 - 0 Diósgyőr. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Győri ETO vs Diósgyőr?
The NB I match finished Győri ETO 4:0 Diósgyőr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Győri ETO and Diósgyőr?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Győri ETO won 1, Diósgyőr won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Győri ETO vs Diósgyőr?
Győri ETO score 1.94 goals per game on average and Diósgyőr 1.23. The NB I average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Győri ETO's matches and 71% of Diósgyőr's.
What form are Győri ETO and Diósgyőr in?
Over the last 5 games Győri ETO have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Diósgyőr 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Győri ETO vs Diósgyőr?
The statistical background for Győri ETO vs Diósgyőr — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


