Győri ETO vs Ferencváros: match statistics
Győri ETO vs Ferencváros: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Győri ETO played Ferencváros in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Győri ETO: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Ferencváros: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Győri ETO scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Ferencváros scores 1.97 and concedes 1.03. League average: 3.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Győri ETO 59%, Ferencváros 66%. Over 2.5: Győri ETO 52%, Ferencváros 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Győri ETO has higher xG: 2.02 vs 1.89. Győri ETO: 16.9 shots per match, Ferencváros: 15.7.
Match halves
Győri ETO: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.07. Ferencváros: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.97.
Goals by minute
Győri ETO: 61-75 (15 goals). Ferencváros: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB I: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams sit very close in the table (Győri 1st, Ferencváros 2nd) and share an identical record in their last 5 matches (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) with an average of 2 points per game, indicating an even contest. Ferencváros, however, holds an edge in efficiency: they win 73% of away matches versus 57% home wins for the hosts, average 1.93 goals on the road and have scored 8 goals in the last 5 games, with no away matches without a goal (FTS 0% vs 29% for the hosts). Győri generates more chances at home: average xG 2.11 versus 1.66 for the visitors, about 6 shots on target and 17.43 attempts per game, and 62% possession, while conceding only 0.64 goals per home game compared to 0.73 for the visitors. The decisive factor is conversion — hosts have an accuracy rate around 8% versus 14% for Ferencváros, which, given equal points tallies, increases the visitors’ probability of converting the fewer chances they create. Based on this, I tip a narrow Ferencváros win, though the match should be tight and decided by a small number of goal-mouth situations.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a high BTTS rate this season: Győri 71% and Ferencváros 60%, versus the league average of 61%, indicating a bias toward a Goal/Goal scenario. Offensively Győri averages 2.0 goals and xG 2.13 with 6.64 shots on target, while Ferencváros has 1.93 goals and xG 1.66 with 4.87 shots on target; shot-to-goal conversion stands at 12% versus 14%. Defensively Ferencváros concedes only 0.73 goals on average away and records a clean sheet in 40% of away matches, whereas Győri concedes 1.36 at home and has 21% clean sheets; at the same time Ferencváros has 0% matches without scoring, and Győri has 7% such games. In the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% of cases, with goal outputs 9 (Győri) and 8 (Ferencváros) and goals conceded 4 and 7, showing recent form favors goal exchanges. Considering 71% vs 60%, the league 61%, the xG advantage (2.13 vs 1.66) and the fact Ferencváros consistently scores (0% matches without scoring), I forecast BTTS - Yes at 70% vs 30% and select yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams demonstrate strong attacking output: Győri ETO averages 2.00 goals per game, Ferencváros 1.93, and modelled xG is 2.13 for the home side and 1.66 for the visitors, translating to expected 1.72 goals for the home team and 1.40 for the away team (total 3.12). Seasonal stats confirm a propensity for high-scoring games — 93% of Győri ETO’s matches exceeded Over 2.5 goals, 80% of Ferencváros’s matches exceeded Over 1.5 goals, and in 71% of home matches and 60% of away matches both teams scored at least once. In the last 5 fixtures the home team scored 9 goals total (1.8 per game), the visitors 8 goals (1.6 per game), with average xG of 2.02 (home) and 1.33 (away) for that period. Given the expected 3.12 goals, the strong Over 1.5 rates (93%/80%) and frequent BTTS occurrences, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — I estimate its probability at about 92%. Over 2.5 is also meaningful (≈70%) due to the home side’s 93% Over 2.5 rate and the modelled xG, whereas Over 3.5 looks less certain (~38%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ferencváros is the clear favorite: they win 73% of matches this season and lead at the break in 67% of games, averaging 1.0 goals scored and only 0.13 conceded in the first half. The hosts score on average 1.0 goals by halftime and concede 0.64, while the visitors have scored 6 goals in the 0–15 minute period versus 3 for the hosts, suggesting that Ferencváros more often takes the lead before the break. Although Győri generates higher xG (2.13 vs 1.66) and more shots (17.29 vs 14.2), the visitors are more efficient (shot conversion 14% vs 12%) and average 2.4 points per game compared to the hosts’ 1.64, which increases Ferencváros’s likelihood of winning. Given the visitors’ 67% rate of leading at the break and their 73% seasonal win rate, the most confident signal is Ferencváros to lead at half-time and win full-time (2/2). Due to the hosts’ 9 goals in the 76–90 minute window, I also allow X/2 as a secondary option.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Győri ETO | Ferencváros | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ferencváros is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Győri ETO · 2.6 pts / match - Ferencváros
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Győri ETO scores in 86% of matches (25 of 29 matches), while Ferencváros keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
Ferencváros scores in 97% of matches (28 of 29 matches), while Győri ETO keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Győri ETO
Over / Under - Ferencváros
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Győri ETO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ferencváros - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Győri ETO
Ferencváros
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| Győri ETO | Liga | Ferencváros | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.00 | 3.00 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 59% | 60% | ▲ 66% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 59% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 34% | 22% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 69% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 87% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Győri ETO 1 - 0 - 1 Ferencváros. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Győri ETO vs Ferencváros?
The NB I match finished Győri ETO 1:0 Ferencváros. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Győri ETO and Ferencváros?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Győri ETO won 1, Ferencváros won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Győri ETO vs Ferencváros?
Győri ETO score 2.00 goals per game on average and Ferencváros 1.97. The NB I average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Győri ETO's matches and 66% of Ferencváros's.
What form are Győri ETO and Ferencváros in?
Over the last 5 games Győri ETO have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ferencváros 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Győri ETO vs Ferencváros?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Győri ETO vs Ferencváros: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


