Hødd vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Hødd vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hødd played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Hødd: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hødd scores 1.30 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.30 and concedes 1.10. League average: 3.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hødd 60%, Kongsvinger 70%. Over 2.5: Hødd 50%, Kongsvinger 80%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 71%.
xG, shots and style
Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.24. Hødd: 9.9 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 15.7.
Match halves
Hødd: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
Hødd: 0-15 (4 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.55 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 71%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger is the favorite: they sit 2nd and have 7 wins this season versus Hødd's 4, while the visitors have scored 23 goals this season compared to the hosts' 13. In the last 5 matches Kongsvinger have scored 11 goals and averaged 2.0 points per game, whereas Hødd scored 9 goals and have 1.4 points per game, indicating better form for the visitors. The visitors create significantly more chances — on average 15 shots and 5.2 on target per match with an average xG of 1.66, versus 10.4 shots, 4.6 on target and xG 1.28 for Hødd — this argues for Kongsvinger’s offensive superiority. Hødd, however, have higher efficiency (shot conversion 15% vs 12% for Kongsvinger) and a good home run (60% wins), but a higher average xG against (1.65) and 8 goals conceded in the last 5 matches weaken their chances. Considering the advantage in chance creation, higher xG and better recent results, I predict a victory for the visitors, with a moderate chance of a draw or a home upset.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Hødd at home has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80%, scores on average 2.8 goals per game and has 0% matches without a goal, which strongly supports goals from the hosts. Kongsvinger away has BTTS 60%, averages 1.8 goals in the season (2.2 in the last 5 matches) and generates xG 1.82 in the last five games, meaning the visitors regularly create scoring chances. Hødd concedes on average 1.0 goals at home in the season (1.6 in the last 5), while Kongsvinger concedes 1.2 goals seasonally, and the xG comparison (seasonal xG_for 1.93 for Hødd vs 1.66 for Kongsvinger and last5 xG_for 1.38 vs 1.82) indicates realistic scoring chances for both teams. Additionally Hødd records 6.0 shots on target on average at home versus 5.2 shots on target for Kongsvinger away, and the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals for Hødd is 100% (combination of over2.5 and BTTS for hosts 80%), which strengthens the both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering 80% vs 60% BTTS, the high xG 1.93 for Hødd and solid xG 1.66/1.82 for Kongsvinger as well as average goals 2.8 vs 1.8, I assess the probability of BTTS at 75% versus 25% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Averaging the teams' offensive and defensive xG, I expect 1.74 goals for Hødd (offensive xG 1.93 vs Kongsvinger defensive xG 1.54) and 1.47 for Kongsvinger (offensive xG 1.66 vs Hødd defensive xG 1.28), giving a total of 3.21 expected goals. Season metrics show Hødd have 100% of home matches Over 2.5, Kongsvinger 60% Away Over 2.5, and the league average Over 2.5 is 71% — strong support for Over 2.5. Hødd average 16.4 shots and 6.0 on target with a 17% conversion, while Kongsvinger concede xG 1.54, so the home side has a real advantage in creating and converting chances. Additionally both teams register high BTTS rates: Hødd 80% and Kongsvinger 60%, increasing the likelihood both teams score and that at least 3 goals occur. Based on this, the optimal line to play is Over 2.5 (pick: over); I estimate its probability at approximately 72% as a compromise between the historical 100%/60% figures and the xG model (3.21).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I assess the most likely scenario is 1/1 (Hødd leading at the break and winning the match). Hødd have a 100% home win rate and average 3.0 points per home match this season versus Kongsvinger’s 1.6 away points, giving a clear home advantage. xG favors Hødd (1.93 vs 1.66), and the hosts average 6.0 shots on target against the visitors’ 5.2 with superior conversion (17% vs 12%). Hødd are also strong after the break: an average of 2.4 goals scored in second halves and an 80% win rate in second halves, while Kongsvinger average 0.6 goals after the break. In the last five matches Hødd led at the break in 60% of games and averaged 1.0 goals by half-time versus Kongsvinger’s 0.6, so I assign the 1/1 HT/FT scenario the highest probability at 38%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hødd | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Hødd · 2 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
1.3 goals / match - Hødd · 2.3 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Hødd · 1.1 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Hødd scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Hødd keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hødd
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / match - Hødd · 1.7 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hødd - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hødd
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Hødd | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.60 | 3.55 | ▼ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 79% | ▲ 90% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 88% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Hødd 0 - 0 - 2 Kongsvinger. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hødd vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Hødd 1:2 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hødd and Kongsvinger?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Hødd won 0, Kongsvinger won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hødd vs Kongsvinger?
Hødd score 1.30 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.30. The First Division average is 3.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Hødd's matches and 70% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Hødd and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Hødd have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hødd vs Kongsvinger?
The statistical background for Hødd vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.