Hadiya Hosaena vs Awassa Kenema: match statistics
Hadiya Hosaena vs Awassa Kenema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hadiya Hosaena played Awassa Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Hadiya Hosaena: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Awassa Kenema: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hadiya Hosaena scores 0.87 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Awassa Kenema scores 1.03 and concedes 0.83. League average: 1.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hadiya Hosaena 53%, Awassa Kenema 47%. Over 2.5: Hadiya Hosaena 30%, Awassa Kenema 27%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Awassa Kenema has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.05. Hadiya Hosaena: 5.8 shots per match, Awassa Kenema: 6.7.
Match halves
Hadiya Hosaena: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.47. Awassa Kenema: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Hadiya Hosaena: 31-45+ (7 goals). Awassa Kenema: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Awassa Kenema are favorites on paper — they sit 4th in the table versus Hadiya Hosaena’s 15th and have 31 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 26. Defensively the visitors are markedly superior: they concede 0.87 goals per away game on average, while Hadiya concedes 1.4 at home, and the clean sheet rate is 40% for Awassa versus just 7% for the hosts. In attack the expected chances are similar — xG is 1.11 for the visitors and 1.10 for the hosts — but Hadiya have a higher shot conversion rate (16% vs 14% for the visitors) and a lower share of matches without a goal (27% vs 40%). At the same time, in the last 5 matches Hadiya scored 5 goals, with a record of 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss and 1.2 points per game, whereas Awassa have 2 goals, 0 wins and 0.6 points per game in that period. Considering the visitors’ superior league position and significantly stronger defense, but also the hosts’ better short-term form, I predict a win for the visitors; suggested probabilities are 50% for an away win, 30% for a draw and 20% for a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Hadiya at home averages 1.13 goals scored and concedes 0.80, Awassa away averages 0.93 scored and 0.87 conceded; a simple Poisson calculation based on these means yields roughly a 41% chance for BTTS. Offensive xG is similar (xG 1.13 vs 1.11), while xG against 1.24 and 1.27 shows both teams create chances but do not always convert them into goals. Seasonal BTTS are 53% for Hadiya and 40% for Awassa, and in the last 5 matches Hadiya has 60% BTTS while Awassa 40%, indicating asymmetry in team behavior. The key negative signal for BTTS is Awassa’s poor finishing — only 2 goals in the last 5 (0.4 per match) with a recent xG of 1.14, whereas Hadiya scored 5 in the last 5 (1.0). Considering the low league average goals of 1.78 and league BTTS of 41% plus Awassa’s current scoring drought, I recommend backing No Goal with an estimated 58% vs 42% for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model (home attack xG 1.13 and away 1.11, with xG against 1.24 for home and 1.27 for away) projects expected goals of 1.20 for Hadiya Hosaena and 1.18 for Awassa Kenema, totaling 2.38. A Poisson distribution for a mean of 2.38 yields roughly a 69% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 42% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and only around 20% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal indicators support Over 1.5: hosts have 67% of matches with >1.5 goals, visitors 47%, although the league averages 1.78 goals per game and in the last 5 matches of both teams Over 2.5 occurred only in 20% of cases. Additionally, hosts record BTTS in 53% of matches versus 40% for visitors, which increases the likelihood of at least one goal from each side and strengthens the signal for Over 1.5; Over 2.5 (42%) and Over 3.5 (20%) are less convincing as value bets.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I’m backing a Half-Time draw with a home win at Full-Time (X/1). A draw at the break appears most likely: hosts drew at HT in 47% of matches and visitors in 60%, giving an averaged HT draw probability of ~53%. After the break I expect Hadiya Hosaena to assert dominance: hosts score on average 1.00 goals in second halves and win 47% of 2Hs, while Awassa average 0.87 goals and win 33% of 2Hs. Additionally, hosts show higher offensive potential over the season (1.13 goals scored per game vs 0.93 for the visitors) and have averaged 1.0 goals in their last 5 matches compared to 0.4 for the opponents, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround in favor of the hosts after halftime. Considering these figures (HT draws ~53%, stronger home second-half performance with 47% 2H wins and 2H scoring average 1.73 vs 1.4), the X/1 scenario is the strongest signal from the available data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hadiya Hosaena | Awassa Kenema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hadiya Hosaena is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Hadiya Hosaena · 0.6 pts / match - Awassa Kenema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Awassa Kenema is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
0.87 goals / match - Hadiya Hosaena · 1.03 goals / match - Awassa Kenema
Awassa Kenema is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.07 goals / match - Hadiya Hosaena · 0.83 goals / match - Awassa Kenema
Hadiya Hosaena scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Awassa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
Awassa Kenema scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Hadiya Hosaena keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hadiya Hosaena
Over / Under - Awassa Kenema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Awassa Kenema is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Hadiya Hosaena · 1.13 pts / match - Awassa Kenema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hadiya Hosaena - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Awassa Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hadiya Hosaena
Awassa Kenema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Hadiya Hosaena | Liga | Awassa Kenema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.93 | 1.78 | • 1.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 41% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 30% | 27% | • 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 40% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 54% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Hadiya Hosaena 1 - 0 - 0 Awassa Kenema. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hadiya Hosaena vs Awassa Kenema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Hadiya Hosaena 1:0 Awassa Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hadiya Hosaena vs Awassa Kenema?
Hadiya Hosaena score 0.87 goals per game on average and Awassa Kenema 1.03. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Hadiya Hosaena's matches and 47% of Awassa Kenema's.
What form are Hadiya Hosaena and Awassa Kenema in?
Over the last 5 games Hadiya Hosaena have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Awassa Kenema 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hadiya Hosaena vs Awassa Kenema?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hadiya Hosaena vs Awassa Kenema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


