Saudi Arabia - First DivisionPrince Abdullah bin Jalawi Sports City StadiumData current as of 02 November 2026

Hajer vs Al Ula: match statistics

Hajer crest
Hajer
1 : 3half-time 0:1
Al Ula crest
Al Ula

Hajer vs Al Ula: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hajer played Al Ula in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 1 November 2026. Venue: Prince Abdullah bin Jalawi Sports City Stadium. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Hajer: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Al Ula: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hajer scores 0.88 and concedes 1.63 goals per match. Al Ula scores 2.38 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.35 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hajer 50%, Al Ula 50%. Over 2.5: Hajer 50%, Al Ula 50%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Al Ula has higher xG: 2.00 vs 1.18. Hajer: 9.8 shots per match, Al Ula: 16.9.

Match halves

Hajer: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25. Al Ula: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.75.

Goals by minute

Hajer: 31-45+ (4 goals). Al Ula: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 2.35 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

League leaders Al Ula remain unbeaten after 8 matches (7 wins and a draw), while 16th-placed Hajer have won just once and are winless in their last 5 games. The visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 13 goals in the process, while the hosts have scored 3 and suffered 3 defeats over the same period. Away from home, Al Ula average 2 goals and 6.25 shots on target per match, whereas Hajer score 0.75 goals at home from 2.5 shots on target. The visitors’ attacking advantage is also reflected in the quality of their chances: their away xG is 1.96, compared with Hajer’s 1.07 at home. Hajer concede an average of 2.25 goals at home and have yet to keep a clean sheet there, making an Al Ula win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In Hajer’s home matches and Al Ula’s away matches, both teams scored in 50% of games, so the season data does not favour either option. The pick for “No” is driven primarily by recent form: Hajer averaged just 0.6 goals across five matches, while Al Ula conceded an average of 0.6 goals over the same period. The visitors kept a clean sheet in 50% of their away matches, further increasing the risk that the hosts fail to score. However, this is not a strong pick, as Hajer’s home average is 2.75 goals, and neither team had a match without scoring at home or away, respectively.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Al Ula have averaged 2.6 goals scored across their last 5 matches, while Hajer have managed just 0.6, suggesting the visitors pose the greater attacking threat. Their advantage is also reflected in xG over that period: 2.08 compared with the hosts’ 1.18. At the same time, Al Ula have conceded an average of just 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches, and games involving the two teams have featured at least 4 goals in 25% and 50% of cases, respectively. Therefore, despite the visitors’ strong attack, the projected total of 2.45 goals makes Under 3.5 goals the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal for a draw at half-time is that Al Ula were level at the break in all four away matches analysed, while both teams were level at half-time in three of their last five games. After the break, the visitors have a clear edge in form: they have averaged 2.4 goals in the second half over their last five matches, while Hajer have failed to score in that period. Al Ula have won four of their last five matches, averaging 2.6 goals per game, whereas Hajer have not won any and have averaged 0.6 goals. The hosts’ advantage makes the forecast less certain: they led at the break in three of their four home matches, and their average xG is 2.03 compared with 1.96 for the visitors. Even so, Al Ula’s current form and their second-half edge make a draw at half-time followed by an away win the most likely scenario: X/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

24Possession (%)76
HajerAl Ula
7Shots17
HajerAl Ula
2Shots on target7
HajerAl Ula
0.78xG2.05
HajerAl Ula
0Corners4
HajerAl Ula
27Dangerous attacks69
HajerAl Ula
12Fouls11
HajerAl Ula
3Cards0
HajerAl Ula

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.88Goals scored / match2.38
HajerAl Ula
1.63Goals conceded / match0.5
HajerAl Ula
41%Average possession63%
HajerAl Ula
3Shots on target / match6.75
HajerAl Ula

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.75Shots per match16.88
HajerAl Ula
3Shots on target6.75
HajerAl Ula
9%Shot conversion14.1%
HajerAl Ula
41%Possession63%
HajerAl Ula
1.18xG for2
HajerAl Ula
1.37xG against0.92
HajerAl Ula

Shooting quality

Hajer: BalancedAl Ula: Dominant
HajerAl Ula
Accuracy (shots on target)31%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ula is 550% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Hajer · 2.6 pts / match - Al Ula

Hajer
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W38% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-4
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
LDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Ula
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
88% W13% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-0
2.75 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 away
3-1-0
WWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.10Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ula is 170% better for: goals scored per match.

0.88 goals / match - Hajer · 2.38 goals / match - Al Ula

Al Ula is 226% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.63 goals / match - Hajer · 0.5 goals / match - Al Ula

Hajer scoring profile: mixed

Hajer scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).

Al Ula scoring profile: very strong

Al Ula scores in 100% of matches (8 of 8 matches), while Hajer keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).

7Goals scored (season)19
HajerAl Ula
13Goals conceded (season)4
HajerAl Ula
2.5Average goals in match2.88
HajerAl Ula
3Goals scored (last 5)13
HajerAl Ula
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
HajerAl Ula

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
HajerAl Ula
25%2 goals63%
HajerAl Ula
13%3 goals50%
HajerAl Ula
0%4 goals13%
HajerAl Ula

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal50%
HajerAl Ula
50%2 goals0%
HajerAl Ula
25%3 goals0%
HajerAl Ula
13%4 goals0%
HajerAl Ula

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time0%
HajerAl Ula
13%BTTS in both halves0%
HajerAl Ula
13%Scored in both halves25%
HajerAl Ula

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
HajerAl Ula
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
HajerAl Ula
40%BTTS - last 560%
HajerAl Ula

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
HajerAl Ula
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
HajerAl Ula
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
HajerAl Ula

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
HajerAl Ula
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
HajerAl Ula
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
HajerAl Ula

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ula is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Hajer · 1.63 pts / match - Al Ula

Hajer - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Al Ula - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.63
HajerAl Ula
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.63
HajerAl Ula
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
HajerAl Ula
1.38Average goals (1st half)0.75
HajerAl Ula
50%Clean sheet before half-time88%
HajerAl Ula
50%No goal before half-time63%
HajerAl Ula

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per match (2nd half)2.25
HajerAl Ula
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)1.75
HajerAl Ula
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
HajerAl Ula
1.13Average goals (2nd half)2.13
HajerAl Ula
38%Clean sheet after half-time63%
HajerAl Ula
88%No goal after half-time13%
HajerAl Ula

Hajer - second-half results

13% W38% D50% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Ula - second-half results

63% W38% D0% L
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding232%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 88%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hajer - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Al Ula - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.60
Goals scored / match0.22.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.42.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference0+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hajer
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Ula
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
4
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
5
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hajer

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Al Ula

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
220%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

HajerLigaAl Ula
Average goals in match▲ 2.502.35▲ 2.88
Both teams scored▲ 50%48%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%36%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 25%33%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time• 63%62%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 63%71%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.35
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HajerRed cardBakary Coulibaly
  2. HajerYellow cardWadhah Zaidi
  3. Al UlaSubstitutionOn: Abdulfattah Mohamed AdamOff: Sumayhan Alnabit
  4. Al UlaSubstitutionOn: Yousif Mosuad Y. Al HonaifeshOff: Sylla Sow

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Hajer vs Al Ula?

The First Division match finished Hajer 1:3 Al Ula. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hajer vs Al Ula?

Hajer score 0.88 goals per game on average and Al Ula 2.38. The First Division average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Hajer's matches and 50% of Al Ula's.

What form are Hajer and Al Ula in?

Over the last 5 games Hajer have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Al Ula 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hajer vs Al Ula?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.