Haka vs EIF: match statistics
Haka vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haka played EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Haka: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. EIF: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haka scores 1.62 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. EIF scores 1.54 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.44 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haka 46%, EIF 54%. Over 2.5: Haka 46%, EIF 69%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Haka has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.33. Haka: 11.9 shots per match, EIF: 10.1.
Match halves
Haka: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.15. EIF: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Haka: 76-90+ (6 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Haka to win because the hosts average 2.14 goals per home match versus EIF’s 1.17 on the road. EIF concedes 3.00 goals per away match, while Haka concedes only 1.57 at home; in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 10 goals compared to Haka’s 6. Haka also posts a higher home xG (1.67 vs 1.28 xG for the visitors away), more shots on target (5.14 vs 3.0) and a superior shot conversion rate (16% vs 12%). Additionally, Haka have a positive home record (goal difference +4, win rate 43%), whereas EIF have a negative away goal difference (-11) and 0% wins on the road. Considering Haka’s offensive edge, EIF’s poor away defence and the last 5 matches form (points 1.2 vs 0.8), I assign a higher probability to the hosts than to a draw or an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'BTTS - Yes' scenario is more likely, as EIF away have 0% clean sheets and concede on average 3.0 goals per match, with BTTS occurring in 67% of their away fixtures. Haka at home score on average 1.86 goals (21 this season) and have an xG of 1.37 while allowing an xG against of 1.42, indicating the hosts create chances but also concede opportunities. In the last 5 matches Haka have scored 6 and conceded 6 (avg 1.2/1.2), while EIF have scored 3 and conceded 10 (0.6/2.0), so the visitors regularly concede goals and can occasionally reply. Additionally both teams have a high share of matches over 2.5 goals (Haka 71% and EIF 67%), so a BTTS forecast rated at around 72% is justified.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of about 2.82 goals: Haka 1.47 and EIF 1.35, calculated as the average of attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG ((1.37+1.56)/2 = 1.47 and (1.28+1.42)/2 = 1.35). Season-long figures support this: Haka scores 1.86 goals at home on average, while EIF concedes 3.0 away; the league averages 2.38 goals per match. Haka has 71% of home matches over 1.5 and 71% over 2.5, while EIF records 83% over 1.5 and 67% over 2.5 on the road, which increases the probability of Over 1.5/2.5. Haka averages 4.57 shots on target with 18% conversion, and EIF 3.0 SoT with 12% conversion, further raising the realistic chance of goals. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (I rate 92%), Over 2.5 looks solid (72%), and Over 3.5 is less likely (30%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Haka has a clear statistical advantage: the hosts average 1.86 goals per match versus EIF’s 1.17, win 71% of home games and collect 2.14 points per match, while EIF have 0% away wins and just 0.17 PPG. At half-time Haka led in 3 of 7 home matches (43%) and average 0.71 goals scored by the break with only 0.14 conceded, whereas EIF average 0.5 scored and 1.67 conceded by half-time and were trailing at the break in 6 of 6 away games (100%). Haka’s edge is supported by xG and chance metrics: home xG 1.37 versus EIF 1.28, shots on target 4.57 vs 3.0 and finishing rate 18% vs 12%, and in the 31–45' phase Haka scored 3 goals while EIF conceded 6 in that phase. Therefore the model favors the scenario of Haka leading at half-time and winning full-time (1/1) as the strongest signal (37%), with the overall probability of Haka leading at the break being 43%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haka | EIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Haka is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Haka · 0.8 pts / match - EIF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.62 goals / match - Haka · 1.54 goals / match - EIF
Haka is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.08 goals / match - Haka · 2 goals / match - EIF
Haka scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
EIF scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haka
Over / Under - EIF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haka is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Haka · 1 pts / match - EIF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haka
EIF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Haka | Liga | EIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.69 | 2.44 | ▲ 3.54 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 42% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 46% | 44% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 33% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 64% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 73% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Haka 1 - 0 - 0 EIF. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Haka vs EIF?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 3:1 EIF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs EIF?
Haka score 1.62 goals per game on average and EIF 1.54. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Haka's matches and 54% of EIF's.
What form are Haka and EIF in?
Over the last 5 games Haka have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and EIF 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs EIF?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs EIF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.