Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 07 September 2026

Haka vs KäPa: match statistics

Haka crest
Haka
2 : 2half-time 0:1
KäPa crest
KäPa

Haka vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haka played KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Haka: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. KäPa: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haka scores 2.50 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. KäPa scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haka 0%, KäPa 67%. Over 2.5: Haka 50%, KäPa 67%. League level: BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Haka has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.07. Haka: 13.0 shots per match, KäPa: 7.3.

Match halves

Haka: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 2.00. KäPa: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Haka: 61-75 (2 goals). KäPa: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 1.94 goals per match, BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Haka at home shows strong offensive metrics and control of the game: on average 17 shots and 7 on target per match, conversion rate around 29% and an average of 5 goals per home match with xG 2.01. In the last 5 fixtures Haka scored 11 goals, are unbeaten (form last 5: W D D W W) and average 2.2 points per match in that period, while at home they maintain 100% wins and 100% clean sheets. KäPa as away team have less initiative: 8.5 shots and 3.5 on target per match, 41% possession, away xG 1.13 and on average 1.5 goals scored away, with 0.5 goals conceded on the road. Additionally KäPa conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Haka conceded 2 in the same period, indicating a home advantage in defense and chance finishing. Considering possession dominance (65% vs 41%), better efficiency (29% vs 18%) and higher xG for the hosts (2.01 vs 1.13), I predict a Haka victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - Yes is strong: Haka has a seasonal home BTTS rate of 100%, while KäPa has a seasonal BTTS of 50% and an 80% BTTS rate in the last 5 matches. In their last 5 fixtures Haka scored 11 goals (2.2 avg) and KäPa scored 9 goals (1.8 avg), indicating both sides regularly find the net. KäPa’s defense appears more vulnerable — they conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 avg) versus Haka’s 2 conceded in the last 5 (0.4 avg), but Haka have no clean sheets at home this season (0%), so the hosts also concede frequently at home. Additionally, Haka generate an average xG of 1.95 over the last 5 matches compared to KäPa’s 1.10, and Haka’s finishing rate is 40% versus KäPa’s 18%, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring at least once. Based on Haka’s 100% home BTTS, KäPa’s 80% in-form BTTS and the goal outputs of 2.2 vs 1.8, I assess the probability of BTTS at 75% (Yes) and 25% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have been highly productive recently: in the last 5 matches Haka averaged 2.2 goals and KäPa 1.8 goals, yielding a combined average of 4.0 goals in their recent outings. Based on xG and giving greater weight to form (Haka 1.95 xG in the last 5 vs 0.96 seasonally; KäPa 1.10 in the last 5 and 1.13 seasonally), I estimated 1.50 expected goals for Haka and 1.11 for KäPa, totaling 2.61 expected goals. Over 2.5 stats support this view: Haka has 100% of matches over 2.5 this season and 60% in the last 5, KäPa has 80% over 2.5 in the last 5, and Haka has a season-long BTTS of 100%, which increases the probability of goals from both sides. Additionally, KäPa averages 8.5 shots (3.5 on target) per game, while Haka, despite fewer shots (5.0), has a very high conversion rate of 40% (vs 18% for KäPa), favoring real goals. Given these figures the strongest market to play is Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Analysis of the last 5 matches shows Haka scores an average of 2.2 goals and concedes 0.4 per game, while KäPa averages 1.8 scored and 1.4 conceded, giving Haka the advantage in the final outcome. KäPa more often takes the lead at the break — in 4 of the last 5 matches (80%) — while Haka led at half-time in 3 of 5 (60%), indicating KäPa’s activity in the first 45 minutes. The difference appears after the break: Haka scores on average 1.8 points after half-time versus 0.4 for KäPa and has a positive second-half goal balance of +6 compared to 0, so Haka tends to stage a turnaround. Additionally, KäPa generates higher xG (1.13 vs 0.96) and more shots (8.5 vs 5.0), but Haka has a much higher efficiency (conversion 40% vs 18%), which favors comebacks; therefore the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time outcome is KäPa leading at half-time and Haka winning after the break (2/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
HakaKäPa
16Shots11
HakaKäPa
8Shots on target5
HakaKäPa
2.02xG1.41
HakaKäPa
5Corners4
HakaKäPa
62Dangerous attacks51
HakaKäPa
11Fouls17
HakaKäPa
3Cards3
HakaKäPa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.5Goals scored / match1.67
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded / match1
HakaKäPa
66%Average possession45%
HakaKäPa
4.5Shots on target / match3
HakaKäPa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match7.33
HakaKäPa
4.5Shots on target3
HakaKäPa
19.2%Shot conversion22.7%
HakaKäPa
66%Possession45%
HakaKäPa
1.63xG for1.07
HakaKäPa
0.84xG against1.12
HakaKäPa

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingKäPa: Counter-attacking
HakaKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)35%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.56

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KäPa is 17% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Haka · 2.33 pts / match - KäPa

Haka
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
KäPa
WDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

2.5 goals / match - Haka · 1.67 goals / match - KäPa

Haka scoring profile: mixed

Haka scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

KäPa scoring profile: mixed

KäPa scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 matches).

5Goals scored (season)5
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (season)3
HakaKäPa
2.5Average goals in match2.67
HakaKäPa
5Goals scored (last 5)5
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (last 5)3
HakaKäPa

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
HakaKäPa
50%2 goals67%
HakaKäPa
50%3 goals0%
HakaKäPa
50%4 goals0%
HakaKäPa

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal67%
HakaKäPa
0%2 goals33%
HakaKäPa
0%3 goals0%
HakaKäPa
0%4 goals0%
HakaKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
HakaKäPa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
HakaKäPa
50%Scored in both halves0%
HakaKäPa

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
HakaKäPa
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HakaKäPa
0%BTTS - last 567%
HakaKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
HakaKäPa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
HakaKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
HakaKäPa

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
HakaKäPa
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
HakaKäPa
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
HakaKäPa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KäPa is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Haka · 3 pts / match - KäPa

Haka - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)3
HakaKäPa
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1.67
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
HakaKäPa
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.67
HakaKäPa
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
HakaKäPa
50%No goal before half-time0%
HakaKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0.33
HakaKäPa
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
HakaKäPa
2Average goals (2nd half)1
HakaKäPa
100%Clean sheet after half-time33%
HakaKäPa
50%No goal after half-time100%
HakaKäPa

Haka - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 67%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.52.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.52.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.33
Goals scored / match1.70.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.71.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haka
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
133%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.87
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
205%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
232%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaKäPa
Average goals in match 2.501.94 2.67
Both teams scored 0%28% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%39% 67%
Clean sheets 100%44% 33%
Goal before half-time 50%61% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%56% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.94
Average goals per match
28%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / match
0.72
Away goals / match
+69%
Home attack advantage
+41%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KäPaYellow cardDenis Cukici
  2. HakaSubstitutionOn: Tomas SoveliusOff: Niklas Friberg
  3. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Daniel RökmanOff: Niklas Leinonen
  4. HakaSubstitutionOn: Matias SyrjäläinenOff: Roni Pietsalo
  5. KäPaGoalSamba Sillah
  6. KäPaYellow cardAntonio Almen
  7. KäPaYellow cardDaniel Rökman
  8. HakaYellow cardJesper Karlsson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Haka vs KäPa?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 2:2 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs KäPa?

Haka score 2.50 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Haka's matches and 67% of KäPa's.

What form are Haka and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games Haka have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and KäPa 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs KäPa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.