Norway - EliteserienData current as of 06 September 2026

HamKam vs Start: match statistics

HamKam crest
HamKam
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Start crest
Start

HamKam vs Start: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

HamKam played Start in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

HamKam: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match. Start: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

HamKam scores 2.00 and concedes 2.50 goals per match. Start scores 0.80 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: HamKam 75%, Start 80%. Over 2.5: HamKam 100%, Start 20%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

HamKam has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.27. HamKam: 11.8 shots per match, Start: 10.0.

Match halves

HamKam: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Start: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

HamKam: 31-45+ (3 goals). Start: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

HamKam has a clear offensive advantage: at home they average 2.33 goals per match and produce 13 shots (5 on target) per game, while Start on the road scores only 0.67 goals with 7.67 shots and 2.67 on target. The difference in efficiency is also evident — home side's shot conversion is 18% versus 9% for the visitors, and HamKam have not had a goalless home match (0% such games) whereas Start failed to score in 33% of their away matches. Quality of chances is confirmed by xG: HamKam's home xG is 1.46 versus Start's away xG of 1.00, while xG against are similar (1.73 vs 1.69), suggesting the home advantage is driven mainly by a higher volume and efficiency of chances rather than defensive superiority. Recent form also favors the hosts — HamKam scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches and averages 1.2 points per game in that sample, while Start scored 4 goals and averages only 0.6 points per game. Considering HamKam's 67% home win rate versus Start's 0% away win rate, and the fact both teams concede on average 2 goals per game, the most likely outcome is a home victory, although a draw cannot be ruled out.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show strong signals for BTTS: HamKam has 100% matches with both teams scoring this season, Start 67%, and in the last 5 matches the rates are 60% and 80% respectively. HamKam averages 1.0 goals per match with xG 1.68 and attempts 13.5 shots (5.0 on target), while Start has 0.67 goals, xG 1.0 and 7.67 shots (2.67 on target); this indicates a clear advantage for HamKam in chance creation, but Start also generates xG sufficient to score. Both teams are defensively vulnerable — HamKam concedes 1.0 goals for the season and 2.4 in the last 5, and Start concedes 2.0 for the season and 1.6 in the last 5 — which increases the likelihood of both sides scoring. Additionally, the league average goals is 2.79, and the teams’ season BTTS rates (100% and 67% vs league 49%) significantly exceed the league level, further supporting a both teams to score scenario. Based on these numbers I estimate the probability of BTTS at around 78% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals are approximately 1.69 for HamKam and 1.09 for Start, totaling 2.78 goals. This is close to the league average of 2.79 and, combined with both teams having 100% of season matches over 1.5 goals (HamKam 100%, Start 100%), strongly supports an Over 1.5 scenario. HamKam generates 1.68 xG with an average of 13.5 shots and 5.0 on target per game, while Start has 1.00 xG with 7.67 shots and 2.67 on target, indicating HamKam’s offensive advantage. In the last 5 matches HamKam averaged 4.0 goals per game (8 scored and 12 conceded) and 80% of matches over 2.5, compared to 20% for Start, so I estimated the probability of Over 2.5 at ~63%; Over 3.5 remains less likely (~27%) given HamKam’s seasonal 0% matches over 3.5 and 33% for Start. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation) due to both teams’ 100% Over 1.5 frequency and combined xG of 2.78.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

HamKam holds a clear advantage in chance creation: xG 1.68 versus Start’s 1.00, 5.0 shots on target compared to 2.67, and a season average of 1.0 goals versus 0.67, favoring the home side. In the first half HamKam averages 0.5 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, while Start averages 0.33 scored and 1.0 conceded at the break, making Start more vulnerable to conceding before halftime. HamKam has led at the break in 50% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home 50.0), whereas Start has never led at halftime (leadingAtHT_away 0.0), increasing the likelihood of the home side leading after 45 minutes. Additionally, Start concedes an average of 2.0 goals per game (seasonConcededAVG_away 2.0) and has lower PPG of 0.33 versus HamKam’s 1.0, so the most probable scenario is HamKam leading at half-time and winning after 90 minutes (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
HamKamStart
12Shots12
HamKamStart
4Shots on target2
HamKamStart
1.44xG1.16
HamKamStart
5Corners1
HamKamStart
54Dangerous attacks34
HamKamStart
11Fouls14
HamKamStart
1Cards1
HamKamStart

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match0.8
HamKamStart
2.5Goals conceded / match1.6
HamKamStart
44%Average possession44%
HamKamStart
4.5Shots on target / match3.6
HamKamStart

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match10
HamKamStart
4.5Shots on target3.6
HamKamStart
17%Shot conversion8%
HamKamStart
44%Possession44%
HamKamStart
1.37xG for1.27
HamKamStart
1.72xG against1.49
HamKamStart

Shooting quality

HamKam: Counter-attackingStart: Balanced
HamKamStart
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

HamKam is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - HamKam · 0.6 pts / match - Start

HamKam
WLLW
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 100%
Start
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W60% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HamKam is 150% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - HamKam · 0.8 goals / match - Start

Start is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.5 goals / match - HamKam · 1.6 goals / match - Start

HamKam scoring profile: very strong

HamKam scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Start keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Start scoring profile: very strong

Start scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while HamKam keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

8Goals scored (season)4
HamKamStart
10Goals conceded (season)8
HamKamStart
4.5Average goals in match2.4
HamKamStart
8Goals scored (last 5)4
HamKamStart
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
HamKamStart

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
HamKamStart
50%2 goals0%
HamKamStart
25%3 goals0%
HamKamStart
25%4 goals0%
HamKamStart

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal100%
HamKamStart
50%2 goals40%
HamKamStart
50%3 goals20%
HamKamStart
50%4 goals0%
HamKamStart

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time20%
HamKamStart
0%BTTS in both halves0%
HamKamStart
25%Scored in both halves0%
HamKamStart

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
HamKamStart
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HamKamStart
75%BTTS - last 580%
HamKamStart

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
HamKamStart
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
HamKamStart
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
HamKamStart

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
HamKamStart
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
HamKamStart
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
HamKamStart

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

HamKam is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - HamKam · 1 pts / match - Start

HamKam - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Start - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1
HamKamStart
1Goals scored (1st half)0.4
HamKamStart
1.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
HamKamStart
2.5Average goals (1st half)1.2
HamKamStart
25%Clean sheet before half-time40%
HamKamStart
50%No goal before half-time60%
HamKamStart

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1
HamKamStart
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
HamKamStart
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
HamKamStart
2Average goals (2nd half)1.2
HamKamStart
50%Clean sheet after half-time40%
HamKamStart
25%No goal after half-time60%
HamKamStart

HamKam - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Start - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

HamKam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.25
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.51.0
Average goals in match2.52.0
1 goal100%75%
2 goals100%75%
3 goals50%25%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 4
Start - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

HamKam
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Start
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
78%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

HamKam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
214%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Start

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

HamKamLigaStart
Average goals in match 4.502.86 2.40
Both teams scored 75%52% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%50% 20%
Clean sheets 25%26% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%79% 80%
Goal after half-time 75%74% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HamKamSubstitutionOn: Markus JohnsgårdOff: Henrik Udahl
  2. StartSubstitutionOn: James AmpofoOff: Jesper Cornelius
  3. StartSubstitutionOn: Alexander GurendalOff: Håkon Lorentzen
  4. StartYellow cardEirik Schulze
  5. HamKamYellow cardIlir Kukleci

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of HamKam vs Start?

The Eliteserien match finished HamKam 2:1 Start. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before HamKam vs Start?

HamKam score 2.00 goals per game on average and Start 0.80. The Eliteserien average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 75% of HamKam's matches and 80% of Start's.

What form are HamKam and Start in?

Over the last 5 games HamKam have a 2-0-2 record (1.50 points per game) and Start 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HamKam vs Start?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for HamKam vs Start: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.