Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Bnei Raina: match statistics
Hapoel Petah Tikva is displaying stellar form, winning all of their last five matches and netting an impressive 14 goals while conceding just 3. The hosts hold the advantage in possession (52% vs 44%), shot efficiency, and boast a higher average xG (1.52 vs 1.15), highlighting their offensive superiority. Maccabi Bnei Raina sits 14th in the table with a disastrous away record—an 86% loss rate on the road, zero draws, and no clean sheets, while conceding an average of 2.29 goals per game. Furthermore, the visitors have lost six of their last seven away fixtures, confirming their vulnerability on the road. Considering all metrics, particularly the disparity in form and quality, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most probable outcome.
Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Bnei Raina: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hapoel Petah Tikva played Maccabi Bnei Raina in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 3 January 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Hapoel Petah Tikva: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Maccabi Bnei Raina: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hapoel Petah Tikva scores 1.56 and concedes 1.63 goals per match. Maccabi Bnei Raina scores 0.88 and concedes 2.50. League average: 3.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hapoel Petah Tikva 56%, Maccabi Bnei Raina 63%. Over 2.5: Hapoel Petah Tikva 56%, Maccabi Bnei Raina 75%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Hapoel Petah Tikva has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.17. Hapoel Petah Tikva: 12.8 shots per match, Maccabi Bnei Raina: 10.5.
Match halves
Hapoel Petah Tikva: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.69. Maccabi Bnei Raina: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Hapoel Petah Tikva: 31-45+ (7 goals). Maccabi Bnei Raina: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.17 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hapoel Petah Tikva is displaying stellar form, winning all of their last five matches and netting an impressive 14 goals while conceding just 3. The hosts hold the advantage in possession (52% vs 44%), shot efficiency, and boast a higher average xG (1.52 vs 1.15), highlighting their offensive superiority. Maccabi Bnei Raina sits 14th in the table with a disastrous away record—an 86% loss rate on the road, zero draws, and no clean sheets, while conceding an average of 2.29 goals per game. Furthermore, the visitors have lost six of their last seven away fixtures, confirming their vulnerability on the road. Considering all metrics, particularly the disparity in form and quality, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most probable outcome.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hapoel Petah Tikva | Maccabi Bnei Raina | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 1.2 pts / match - Maccabi Bnei Raina
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 0.88 goals / match - Maccabi Bnei Raina
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.63 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 2.5 goals / match - Maccabi Bnei Raina
Hapoel Petah Tikva scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Maccabi Bnei Raina keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 16 matches).
Maccabi Bnei Raina scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Hapoel Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Over / Under - Maccabi Bnei Raina
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 0.88 pts / match - Maccabi Bnei Raina
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hapoel Petah Tikva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Maccabi Bnei Raina - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hapoel Petah Tikva
Maccabi Bnei Raina
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Hapoel Petah Tikva | Liga | Maccabi Bnei Raina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.19 | 3.17 | ▲ 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 24% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 68% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 81% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Hapoel Petah Tikva 1 - 0 - 0 Maccabi Bnei Raina. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Bnei Raina?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Hapoel Petah Tikva 4:1 Maccabi Bnei Raina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Bnei Raina?
Hapoel Petah Tikva score 1.56 goals per game on average and Maccabi Bnei Raina 0.88. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Hapoel Petah Tikva's matches and 63% of Maccabi Bnei Raina's.
What form are Hapoel Petah Tikva and Maccabi Bnei Raina in?
Over the last 5 games Hapoel Petah Tikva have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Maccabi Bnei Raina 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Bnei Raina?
The statistical background for Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Maccabi Bnei Raina — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.