Hapoel Tel Aviv vs Maccabi Netanya: match statistics
Hapoel Tel Aviv displays impressive home form with a 90% win rate at their own ground and a streak of ten consecutive victories at their stadium. The hosts boast a positive goal difference (+12) in home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals while conceding just 0.8 goals per game. Maccabi Netanya faces serious issues in away fixtures, losing 60% of their matches and conceding an average of 2.6 goals per game with a negative goal difference (-11). The visitors have failed to keep a single clean sheet on the road this season and are in poor form, averaging only 0.8 points per match in their last five games. All key indicators, including xG (1.5 vs 1.76 for the visitors, but with a significantly better defense from the hosts with xGA 1.17 vs 1.71), clearly favor Hapoel Tel Aviv to secure a confident victory.
Hapoel Tel Aviv vs Maccabi Netanya: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hapoel Tel Aviv played Maccabi Netanya in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 31 January 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Hapoel Tel Aviv: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Maccabi Netanya: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hapoel Tel Aviv scores 1.85 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Maccabi Netanya scores 1.75 and concedes 2.10. League average: 3.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hapoel Tel Aviv 55%, Maccabi Netanya 75%. Over 2.5: Hapoel Tel Aviv 65%, Maccabi Netanya 75%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.48. Hapoel Tel Aviv: 12.2 shots per match, Maccabi Netanya: 15.9.
Match halves
Hapoel Tel Aviv: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.10. Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.15.
Goals by minute
Hapoel Tel Aviv: 76-90+ (13 goals). Maccabi Netanya: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hapoel Tel Aviv displays impressive home form with a 90% win rate at their own ground and a streak of ten consecutive victories at their stadium. The hosts boast a positive goal difference (+12) in home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals while conceding just 0.8 goals per game. Maccabi Netanya faces serious issues in away fixtures, losing 60% of their matches and conceding an average of 2.6 goals per game with a negative goal difference (-11). The visitors have failed to keep a single clean sheet on the road this season and are in poor form, averaging only 0.8 points per match in their last five games. All key indicators, including xG (1.5 vs 1.76 for the visitors, but with a significantly better defense from the hosts with xGA 1.17 vs 1.71), clearly favor Hapoel Tel Aviv to secure a confident victory.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hapoel Tel Aviv | Maccabi Netanya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hapoel Tel Aviv is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Hapoel Tel Aviv · 0.8 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hapoel Tel Aviv is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.85 goals / match - Hapoel Tel Aviv · 1.75 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya
Hapoel Tel Aviv is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Hapoel Tel Aviv · 2.1 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya
Hapoel Tel Aviv scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).
Maccabi Netanya scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Hapoel Tel Aviv keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hapoel Tel Aviv
Over / Under - Maccabi Netanya
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hapoel Tel Aviv is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Hapoel Tel Aviv · 1.05 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hapoel Tel Aviv - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Maccabi Netanya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hapoel Tel Aviv
Maccabi Netanya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Hapoel Tel Aviv | Liga | Maccabi Netanya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.10 | 3.14 | ▲ 3.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 61% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 65% | 61% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 24% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 67% | ▲ 90% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 80% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Hapoel Tel Aviv 0 - 0 - 1 Maccabi Netanya. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hapoel Tel Aviv vs Maccabi Netanya?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Hapoel Tel Aviv 2:0 Maccabi Netanya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hapoel Tel Aviv vs Maccabi Netanya?
Hapoel Tel Aviv score 1.85 goals per game on average and Maccabi Netanya 1.75. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Hapoel Tel Aviv's matches and 75% of Maccabi Netanya's.
What form are Hapoel Tel Aviv and Maccabi Netanya in?
Over the last 5 games Hapoel Tel Aviv have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Maccabi Netanya 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hapoel Tel Aviv vs Maccabi Netanya?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.