Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI: match statistics

Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood
1 : 0half-time 1:0
ENPPI crest
ENPPI
130%(3.93)
X40%(2.80)
230%(2.05)

Statistical analysis suggests balanced chances for both teams, favoring a draw. Haras El Hodood displays poor home form with only 25% home wins and a goal difference of -3, yet ENPPI is characterized by an extremely high percentage of away draws, reaching 75%. The visitors have better defensive organization (averaging 0.88 goals conceded away) and higher average possession (52% vs 45%), but simultaneously struggle to score effectively (38% of matches without a goal). The form of both teams in the last 5 matches is average, which further supports a draw outcome. Considering ENPPI's tendency to draw and the scoring difficulties of both sides, a sharing of points is the most likely result.

Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haras El Hodood played ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 24 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Haras El Hodood: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. ENPPI: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haras El Hodood scores 0.76 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. ENPPI scores 0.88 and concedes 0.75. League average: 1.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haras El Hodood 47%, ENPPI 44%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 41%, ENPPI 25%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.08. Haras El Hodood: 9.7 shots per match, ENPPI: 8.6.

Match halves

Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.29. ENPPI: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Haras El Hodood: 0-15 (3 goals). ENPPI: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis suggests balanced chances for both teams, favoring a draw. Haras El Hodood displays poor home form with only 25% home wins and a goal difference of -3, yet ENPPI is characterized by an extremely high percentage of away draws, reaching 75%. The visitors have better defensive organization (averaging 0.88 goals conceded away) and higher average possession (52% vs 45%), but simultaneously struggle to score effectively (38% of matches without a goal). The form of both teams in the last 5 matches is average, which further supports a draw outcome. Considering ENPPI's tendency to draw and the scoring difficulties of both sides, a sharing of points is the most likely result.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
Haras El HodoodENPPI
3Shots7
Haras El HodoodENPPI
2Shots on target2
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.63xG1.08
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1Corners4
Haras El HodoodENPPI
40Dangerous attacks68
Haras El HodoodENPPI
17Fouls10
Haras El HodoodENPPI
5Cards1
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.76Goals scored / match0.88
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.47Goals conceded / match0.75
Haras El HodoodENPPI
44%Average possession50%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
3Shots on target / match2.88
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.71Shots per match8.63
Haras El HodoodENPPI
3Shots on target2.88
Haras El HodoodENPPI
7.9%Shot conversion10.1%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
44%Possession50%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.18xG for1.08
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.63xG against1.35
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Shooting quality

Haras El Hodood: BalancedENPPI: Balanced
Haras El HodoodENPPI
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ENPPI is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.6 pts / match - ENPPI

Haras El Hodood
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
18% W29% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-9
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
ENPPI
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W56% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-3
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-1
Last 5 away
0-5-0
DDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ENPPI is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

0.76 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.88 goals / match - ENPPI

ENPPI is 96% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.75 goals / match - ENPPI

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: mixed

Haras El Hodood scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).

ENPPI scoring profile: very strong

ENPPI scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

13Goals scored (season)14
Haras El HodoodENPPI
25Goals conceded (season)12
Haras El HodoodENPPI
2.24Average goals in match1.63
Haras El HodoodENPPI
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Haras El HodoodENPPI
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
Haras El HodoodENPPI

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal69%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
18%2 goals13%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0%3 goals6%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal50%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
47%2 goals25%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
24%3 goals0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time13%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
12%BTTS in both halves0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
18%Scored in both halves13%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
60%BTTS - last 580%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

2nd half

47%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ENPPI is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.76 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.31 pts / match - ENPPI

Haras El Hodood - half-time state
12% leading41% draw47% trailing
ENPPI - half-time state
25% leading56% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.76Points per match (1st half)1.31
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.94Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.41Average goals (1st half)0.69
Haras El HodoodENPPI
29%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
53%No goal before half-time63%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.82Average goals (2nd half)0.94
Haras El HodoodENPPI
65%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
71%No goal after half-time56%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

12% W65% D24% L
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ENPPI - second-half results

31% W44% D25% L
21
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haras El Hodood - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
8
31-45
3
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Haras El HodoodLigaENPPI
Average goals in match 2.241.99 1.63
Both teams scored 47%46% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%33% 25%
Clean sheets 24%35% 50%
Goal before half-time 82%57% 56%
Goal after half-time 47%69% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.99
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Haras El HodoodGoalMohamed Ashraf Tawfik
  2. Haras El HodoodYellow cardIkenna Cooper
  3. Haras El HodoodYellow cardAbdallah Ahmed Hafez
  4. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Youssef BabaOff: Zeyad Kamal
  5. Haras El HodoodSubstitutionOn: Mohamed MagliOff: Mohamed Hamdy Zaki
  6. Haras El HodoodYellow cardIbrahim Abdel Hakeem
  7. ENPPIYellow cardAhmed Khalil Ibrahim
  8. Haras El HodoodYellow cardMahmoud Ali Sayed
  9. ENPPISubstitutionOn: Sayed SaidOff: Ahmed Abdel Fattah Sabeha
  10. Haras El HodoodYellow cardMahmoud El Zonfoly

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ibrahim MohamedMatches officiated: 9
4.78Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins44%Draws22%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 1:0 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI?

Haras El Hodood score 0.76 goals per game on average and ENPPI 0.88. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 44% of ENPPI's.

What form are Haras El Hodood and ENPPI in?

Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and ENPPI 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.