Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia: match statistics
Haras El Hodood sits in 15th place and presents very weak form in the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 defeats), translating to just 0.6 points per match. Kahraba Ismailia, despite occupying the last 21st place, shows improved form with 1.4 points per match in the last five meetings and remains unbeaten in this period (1 win, 4 draws). Both teams have similar efficiency rates (11% vs 10%) and possession (42% vs 43%), as well as comparable xG values, suggesting an even quality of play. The hosts hold a balanced home record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses, while the guests win away in 29% of cases with 29% draws. Given the hosts' current weak form and the rising confidence of the guests, who have not lost their last five matches, a draw appears to be the most probable result.
Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haras El Hodood played Kahraba Ismailia in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 22 January 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Haras El Hodood: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Kahraba Ismailia: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haras El Hodood scores 0.77 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Kahraba Ismailia scores 0.86 and concedes 1.86. League average: 1.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haras El Hodood 46%, Kahraba Ismailia 57%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 38%, Kahraba Ismailia 57%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Kahraba Ismailia has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.09. Haras El Hodood: 8.8 shots per match, Kahraba Ismailia: 8.8.
Match halves
Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.31. Kahraba Ismailia: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Haras El Hodood: 46-60 (3 goals). Kahraba Ismailia: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haras El Hodood sits in 15th place and presents very weak form in the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 defeats), translating to just 0.6 points per match. Kahraba Ismailia, despite occupying the last 21st place, shows improved form with 1.4 points per match in the last five meetings and remains unbeaten in this period (1 win, 4 draws). Both teams have similar efficiency rates (11% vs 10%) and possession (42% vs 43%), as well as comparable xG values, suggesting an even quality of play. The hosts hold a balanced home record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses, while the guests win away in 29% of cases with 29% draws. Given the hosts' current weak form and the rising confidence of the guests, who have not lost their last five matches, a draw appears to be the most probable result.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haras El Hodood | Kahraba Ismailia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kahraba Ismailia is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
0.77 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.86 goals / match - Kahraba Ismailia
Haras El Hodood is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.86 goals / match - Kahraba Ismailia
Haras El Hodood scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
Kahraba Ismailia scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haras El Hodood
Over / Under - Kahraba Ismailia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haras El Hodood is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.79 pts / match - Kahraba Ismailia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haras El Hodood - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haras El Hodood
Kahraba Ismailia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Haras El Hodood | Liga | Kahraba Ismailia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.08 | 1.91 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 43% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 33% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 31% | 38% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 55% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 46% | 68% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 1:2 Kahraba Ismailia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia?
Haras El Hodood score 0.77 goals per game on average and Kahraba Ismailia 0.86. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 57% of Kahraba Ismailia's.
What form are Haras El Hodood and Kahraba Ismailia in?
Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kahraba Ismailia 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia?
The statistical background for Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.