Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Haras El Hodood vs Pharco: match statistics

Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Pharco crest
Pharco
150%(2.40)
X30%(2.75)
220%(3.00)

Haras El Hodood, despite a weak table position (16th place), performs significantly better in home matches than Pharco does on the road. The hosts have a -3 goal difference at home, while the guests concede an average of 1.57 goals per away match while scoring just 0.57, resulting in a -7 balance. Pharco is in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in the last five meetings, whereas Haras earned 2 points during this period. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.2 vs 0.75), and their shot efficiency (10% vs 9%) and average shots on target (2.71 vs 1.86) are higher. Pharco fails to score in 43% of away matches, which, combined with their current crisis form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all factors, Haras El Hodood has a real chance to end their poor streak and capitalize on home advantage against a team in deep crisis.

Haras El Hodood vs Pharco: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haras El Hodood play Pharco in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 5 February 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Haras El Hodood: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Pharco: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haras El Hodood scores 0.79 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Pharco scores 0.45 and concedes 1.06. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haras El Hodood 45%, Pharco 30%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 42%, Pharco 12%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.12. Haras El Hodood: 10.6 shots per match, Pharco: 9.6.

Match halves

Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.33. Pharco: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.24.

Goals by minute

Haras El Hodood: 0-15 (5 goals). Pharco: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Haras El Hodood, despite a weak table position (16th place), performs significantly better in home matches than Pharco does on the road. The hosts have a -3 goal difference at home, while the guests concede an average of 1.57 goals per away match while scoring just 0.57, resulting in a -7 balance. Pharco is in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in the last five meetings, whereas Haras earned 2 points during this period. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.2 vs 0.75), and their shot efficiency (10% vs 9%) and average shots on target (2.71 vs 1.86) are higher. Pharco fails to score in 43% of away matches, which, combined with their current crisis form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all factors, Haras El Hodood has a real chance to end their poor streak and capitalize on home advantage against a team in deep crisis.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Haras El HodoodPharco
14Shots12
Haras El HodoodPharco
6Shots on target4
Haras El HodoodPharco
1.63xG1.49
Haras El HodoodPharco
4Corners5
Haras El HodoodPharco
45Dangerous attacks63
Haras El HodoodPharco
12Fouls10
Haras El HodoodPharco
1Cards0
Haras El HodoodPharco

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Haras El HodoodPharco
0.79Goals scored / match0.45
Haras El HodoodPharco
1.45Goals conceded / match1.06
Haras El HodoodPharco
46%Average possession43%
Haras El HodoodPharco
2.91Shots on target / match2.85
Haras El HodoodPharco

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.61Shots per match9.61
Haras El HodoodPharco
2.91Shots on target2.85
Haras El HodoodPharco
7.4%Shot conversion4.7%
Haras El HodoodPharco
46%Possession43%
Haras El HodoodPharco
1.25xG for1.12
Haras El HodoodPharco
1.48xG against1.44
Haras El HodoodPharco

Shooting quality

Haras El Hodood: BalancedPharco: Balanced
Haras El HodoodPharco
Accuracy (shots on target)27%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.16

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haras El Hodood
LDWLL
Season result split
15% W33% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-17
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-7
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Pharco
DLLLW
Season result split
12% W39% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-13-16
0.76 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-6-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haras El Hodood is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.45 goals / match - Pharco

Pharco is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.06 goals / match - Pharco

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: strong

Haras El Hodood scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).

Pharco scoring profile: mixed

Pharco scores in 36% of matches (12 of 33 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

26Goals scored (season)15
Haras El HodoodPharco
48Goals conceded (season)35
Haras El HodoodPharco
2.24Average goals in match1.52
Haras El HodoodPharco
5Goals scored (last 5)2
Haras El HodoodPharco
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
Haras El HodoodPharco

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal36%
Haras El HodoodPharco
21%2 goals9%
Haras El HodoodPharco
0%3 goals0%
Haras El HodoodPharco
0%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodPharco

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal76%
Haras El HodoodPharco
45%2 goals24%
Haras El HodoodPharco
24%3 goals3%
Haras El HodoodPharco
6%4 goals3%
Haras El HodoodPharco

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time3%
Haras El HodoodPharco
12%BTTS in both halves3%
Haras El HodoodPharco
21%Scored in both halves3%
Haras El HodoodPharco

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS12%
Haras El HodoodPharco
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Haras El HodoodPharco
40%BTTS - last 520%
Haras El HodoodPharco

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
Haras El HodoodPharco
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
Haras El HodoodPharco
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Haras El HodoodPharco

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Haras El HodoodPharco
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Haras El HodoodPharco
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Haras El HodoodPharco

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pharco is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.97 pts / match - Pharco

Haras El Hodood - half-time state
15% leading39% draw45% trailing
Pharco - half-time state
15% leading52% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)0.97
Haras El HodoodPharco
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.21
Haras El HodoodPharco
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Haras El HodoodPharco
1.3Average goals (1st half)0.64
Haras El HodoodPharco
39%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Haras El HodoodPharco
55%No goal before half-time82%
Haras El HodoodPharco

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.7
Haras El HodoodPharco
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
Haras El HodoodPharco
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Haras El HodoodPharco
0.94Average goals (2nd half)0.88
Haras El HodoodPharco
64%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Haras El HodoodPharco
67%No goal after half-time79%
Haras El HodoodPharco

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

15% W55% R30% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pharco - second-half results

9% W42% R48% P
32
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 12%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haras El Hodood - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pharco - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
13
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
2
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

Pharco
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
5
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
8
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
21%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Pharco

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Haras El HodoodLigaPharco
Average goals in match 2.242.02 1.52
Both teams scored 45%47% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%34% 12%
Clean sheets 30%35% 24%
Goal before half-time 76%58% 52%
Goal after half-time 52%70% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Haras El Hodood 0 - 0 - 1 Pharco. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 2:2 Pharco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?

Haras El Hodood score 0.79 goals per game on average and Pharco 0.45. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 30% of Pharco's.

What form are Haras El Hodood and Pharco in?

Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Pharco 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?

The statistical background for Haras El Hodood vs Pharco — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.