Haras El Hodood vs Pharco: match statistics
Haras El Hodood, despite a weak table position (16th place), performs significantly better in home matches than Pharco does on the road. The hosts have a -3 goal difference at home, while the guests concede an average of 1.57 goals per away match while scoring just 0.57, resulting in a -7 balance. Pharco is in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in the last five meetings, whereas Haras earned 2 points during this period. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.2 vs 0.75), and their shot efficiency (10% vs 9%) and average shots on target (2.71 vs 1.86) are higher. Pharco fails to score in 43% of away matches, which, combined with their current crisis form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all factors, Haras El Hodood has a real chance to end their poor streak and capitalize on home advantage against a team in deep crisis.
Haras El Hodood vs Pharco: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haras El Hodood played Pharco in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 5 February 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Haras El Hodood: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Pharco: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haras El Hodood scores 0.73 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Pharco scores 0.33 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haras El Hodood 47%, Pharco 20%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 40%, Pharco 7%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.15 vs 0.95. Haras El Hodood: 9.3 shots per match, Pharco: 8.1.
Match halves
Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.27. Pharco: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.20.
Goals by minute
Haras El Hodood: 16-30 (3 goals). Pharco: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haras El Hodood, despite a weak table position (16th place), performs significantly better in home matches than Pharco does on the road. The hosts have a -3 goal difference at home, while the guests concede an average of 1.57 goals per away match while scoring just 0.57, resulting in a -7 balance. Pharco is in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in the last five meetings, whereas Haras earned 2 points during this period. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.2 vs 0.75), and their shot efficiency (10% vs 9%) and average shots on target (2.71 vs 1.86) are higher. Pharco fails to score in 43% of away matches, which, combined with their current crisis form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all factors, Haras El Hodood has a real chance to end their poor streak and capitalize on home advantage against a team in deep crisis.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haras El Hodood | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.13 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pharco is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.2 pts / match - Pharco
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haras El Hodood is 121% better for: goals scored per match.
0.73 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.33 goals / match - Pharco
Pharco is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.07 goals / match - Pharco
Haras El Hodood scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
Pharco scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haras El Hodood
Over / Under - Pharco
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pharco is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.73 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.93 pts / match - Pharco
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haras El Hodood - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haras El Hodood
Pharco
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Haras El Hodood | Liga | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.13 | 2.01 | ▼ 1.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 40% | 35% | ▼ 7% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 36% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 57% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 40% | 68% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 2:2 Pharco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?
Haras El Hodood score 0.73 goals per game on average and Pharco 0.33. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 20% of Pharco's.
What form are Haras El Hodood and Pharco in?
Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Pharco 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?
The statistical background for Haras El Hodood vs Pharco — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.