Haras El Hodood vs Proxy: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Haras El Hodood vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haras El Hodood play Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 23 October 2026. Venue: Haras El Hodoud Stadium.
Current form
Haras El Hodood: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Proxy: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haras El Hodood scores 1.22 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Proxy scores 0.67 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haras El Hodood 33%, Proxy 22%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 22%, Proxy 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.23. Haras El Hodood: 10.0 shots per match, Proxy: 9.1.
Match halves
Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.78. Proxy: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Haras El Hodood: 76-90+ (5 goals). Proxy: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haras El Hodood | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Haras El Hodood is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.8 pts / match - Proxy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haras El Hodood is 82% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.67 goals / match - Proxy
Haras El Hodood is 336% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.33 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.44 goals / match - Proxy
Haras El Hodood scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
Proxy scores in 33% of matches (3 of 9 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haras El Hodood
Over / Under - Proxy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haras El Hodood is 114% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.78 pts / match - Proxy
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haras El Hodood - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Proxy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haras El Hodood
Proxy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Haras El Hodood | Liga | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.56 | 2.26 | ▼ 2.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 47% | ▼ 22% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 22% | 41% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 33% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
When do Haras El Hodood and Proxy play?
Haras El Hodood face Proxy on 23 October 2026 in Second Division at Haras El Hodoud Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Proxy?
Haras El Hodood score 1.22 goals per game on average and Proxy 0.67. The Second Division average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 22% of Proxy's.
What form are Haras El Hodood and Proxy in?
Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Proxy 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Proxy?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.