Haras El Hodood vs Pyramids FC: match statistics
Pyramids FC demonstrates significantly higher form and quality, sitting in 2nd place in the table with a record of 11 wins this season, while Haras El Hodood is in 17th position with only 4 wins. The visitors are characterized by a significant advantage in ball possession (56% vs 43%) and higher scoring efficiency (1.75 goals per away match vs 1.11 for the hosts at home). The form of the last five matches clearly favors Pyramids FC (2.4 points per match, 4 wins) compared to the poor disposition of the hosts (1 point per match, only 1 win). Additionally, Expected Goals indicate an advantage for the visitors in both offense (xG 1.51 vs 1.18) and defense (xGA 0.95 vs 1.54). Haras El Hodood's negative goal difference at home (-2) and high loss percentage (33%) confirm the hosts' difficulties, making a victory for Pyramids FC the most likely scenario for this meeting.
Haras El Hodood vs Pyramids FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haras El Hodood played Pyramids FC in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 5 March 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Haras El Hodood: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Pyramids FC: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haras El Hodood scores 0.74 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Pyramids FC scores 1.61 and concedes 0.78. League average: 2.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haras El Hodood 42%, Pyramids FC 50%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 37%, Pyramids FC 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Pyramids FC has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.13. Haras El Hodood: 9.3 shots per match, Pyramids FC: 15.1.
Match halves
Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.26. Pyramids FC: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Haras El Hodood: 0-15 (3 goals). Pyramids FC: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pyramids FC demonstrates significantly higher form and quality, sitting in 2nd place in the table with a record of 11 wins this season, while Haras El Hodood is in 17th position with only 4 wins. The visitors are characterized by a significant advantage in ball possession (56% vs 43%) and higher scoring efficiency (1.75 goals per away match vs 1.11 for the hosts at home). The form of the last five matches clearly favors Pyramids FC (2.4 points per match, 4 wins) compared to the poor disposition of the hosts (1 point per match, only 1 win). Additionally, Expected Goals indicate an advantage for the visitors in both offense (xG 1.51 vs 1.18) and defense (xGA 0.95 vs 1.54). Haras El Hodood's negative goal difference at home (-2) and high loss percentage (33%) confirm the hosts' difficulties, making a victory for Pyramids FC the most likely scenario for this meeting.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haras El Hodood | Pyramids FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pyramids FC is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.8 pts / match - Pyramids FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pyramids FC is 118% better for: goals scored per match.
0.74 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.61 goals / match - Pyramids FC
Pyramids FC is 76% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.37 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.78 goals / match - Pyramids FC
Haras El Hodood scores in 58% of matches (11 of 19 matches), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).
Pyramids FC scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haras El Hodood
Over / Under - Pyramids FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pyramids FC is 118% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.84 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.83 pts / match - Pyramids FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haras El Hodood - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pyramids FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haras El Hodood
Pyramids FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Haras El Hodood | Liga | Pyramids FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.11 | 2.01 | ▲ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 37% | 33% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 34% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 57% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 42% | 70% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Pyramids FC?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 1:3 Pyramids FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Pyramids FC?
Haras El Hodood score 0.74 goals per game on average and Pyramids FC 1.61. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 50% of Pyramids FC's.
What form are Haras El Hodood and Pyramids FC in?
Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Pyramids FC 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Pyramids FC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haras El Hodood vs Pyramids FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.