Harrogate Town vs Barnet: match statistics
Harrogate Town vs Barnet: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Harrogate Town played Barnet in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Harrogate Town: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Barnet: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Harrogate Town scores 0.84 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Barnet scores 1.51 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Harrogate Town 42%, Barnet 56%. Over 2.5: Harrogate Town 36%, Barnet 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Barnet has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.26. Harrogate Town: 11.3 shots per match, Barnet: 14.2.
Match halves
Harrogate Town: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.42. Barnet: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Harrogate Town: 16-30 (9 goals). Barnet: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnet is the favorite in this fixture and I project an away win. The visitors sit 9th versus Harrogate's 23rd, with 68 goals scored this season compared to the hosts' 38. In the last 5 matches Barnet have 4 wins and 1 draw scoring 18 goals, while Harrogate have 3 wins and 2 losses with 9 goals. Offensively Barnet averages 4.36 shots on target with a 10% conversion, translating to 1.36 goals away, whereas Harrogate at home register 3.59 shots on target and a 5% conversion (0.68 goals per game). Defensively the gap is equally significant: Barnet concede 1.05 goals away and keep 36% clean sheets, while Harrogate concede 1.64 at home and have only 18% clean sheets; the xG difference also favors the visitors (xG 1.56 vs 1.46 and xG against 1.23 vs 1.62). Considering form (points per game last 5: Barnet 2.6 vs Harrogate 1.8), higher shot efficiency and better defense, I estimate probabilities: Barnet 65%, draw 20%, Harrogate win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a clear tendency to both score: Harrogate has BTTS of 61% this season, Barnet 50%, versus a league average of 52%. In the last 5 matches the signal is even stronger — Harrogate 60% BTTS, Barnet 100%; Barnet scored 18 goals (3.6 avg) and conceded 9 (1.8), while Harrogate scored 9 (1.8) and conceded 6 (1.2). xG and shot metrics confirm the offensive profile: home xG 1.78 vs away 1.56, xG against 1.05 and 1.23, average shots on target 5.04 vs 4.36 and conversion 11% vs 10% — both teams create and allow chances. Clean sheets rates are moderate (30% Harrogate, 36% Barnet), and no-goal occurrences are 13% and 27% of matches, which reduces the probability of a single goalless outcome. Considering the seasonal 61%/50%, recent 60%/100%, xG and goal balance, I estimate BTTS at around 70% (vs 30% for “no”) and recommend taking “Yes”.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A combined xG model yields expected goals: Harrogate offensive xG 1.78 versus Barnet defensive xG conceded 1.23 → expected ≈1.51 for the home side; Barnet offense 1.56 versus Harrogate defense 1.05 → expected ≈1.31 for the away side; total ≈2.82. In the last 5 matches Barnet scored 18 goals (avg 3.6), and Harrogate 9 goals (avg 1.8), which significantly raises the scoring rate vs the league average 2.58. Season metrics show Harrogate have 57% of matches Over 2.5, Barnet 36%, but in the last 5 this was 60% and 100% respectively; additionally both teams have a high share of BTTS (61% Harrogate, 50% Barnet; Barnet L5 BTTS 100%). Barnet have scored 68 goals this season vs 66 conceded by Harrogate, and average shots on target 5.04 and 4.36 support scoring potential. Based on this I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal: expected 2.82 and Barnet form (3.6 goals in L5) plus high BTTS increase the probability of at least three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Harrogate show a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 39% of home matches and score an average of 0.96 goals before half-time versus Barnet’s 0.5, with 38 first-half goals for the hosts compared to 21 for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts have higher xG (1.78 vs 1.56), more shots (15.22 vs 13.23) and more shots on target (5.04 vs 4.36), supporting the likelihood of a lead at the break. Barnet, however, are more dangerous after the interval: away matches yield an average of 1.45 second-half goals (vs 1.26 for the hosts), Barnet score an average of 0.86 goals after half-time versus Harrogate’s 0.7, and they are in better form (last 5 matches: Barnet 4 wins and 1 draw = 80% wins, Harrogate 3W/2L = 60% wins). Overall the strongest signal is Harrogate leading at half-time and maintaining the win (1/1), so the highest probability is assigned to that scenario, with a moderate chance of a draw following a Barnet turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Harrogate Town | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Barnet is 44% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Harrogate Town · 2.6 pts / match - Barnet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnet is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
0.84 goals / match - Harrogate Town · 1.51 goals / match - Barnet
Barnet is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.47 goals / match - Harrogate Town · 1.16 goals / match - Barnet
Harrogate Town scores in 60% of matches (27 of 45 matches), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 33% (15 of 45 matches).
Barnet scores in 80% of matches (36 of 45 matches), while Harrogate Town keeps a clean sheet in 20% (9 of 45 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Harrogate Town
Over / Under - Barnet
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnet is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Harrogate Town · 1.42 pts / match - Barnet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Harrogate Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Harrogate Town
Barnet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Harrogate Town | Liga | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.31 | 2.58 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 52% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 48% | • 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 79% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Harrogate Town 0 - 1 - 0 Barnet. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Harrogate Town vs Barnet?
The EFL League Two match finished Harrogate Town 1:2 Barnet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Harrogate Town vs Barnet?
Harrogate Town score 0.84 goals per game on average and Barnet 1.51. The EFL League Two average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Harrogate Town's matches and 56% of Barnet's.
What form are Harrogate Town and Barnet in?
Over the last 5 games Harrogate Town have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Barnet 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Harrogate Town vs Barnet?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Harrogate Town vs Barnet: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


