Hartford Athletic vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Hartford Athletic vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hartford Athletic play Tampa Bay Rowdies in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 12 September 2026.
Current form
Hartford Athletic: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hartford Athletic scores 0.80 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.56 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hartford Athletic 27%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 44%. Over 2.5: Hartford Athletic 40%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 38%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.37. Hartford Athletic: 11.1 shots per match, Tampa Bay Rowdies: 16.0.
Match halves
Hartford Athletic: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.47. Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Hartford Athletic: 76-90+ (5 goals). Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 40%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hartford Athletic | Tampa Bay Rowdies | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tampa Bay Rowdies is 95% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Hartford Athletic · 1.56 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Hartford Athletic · 0.81 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies
Hartford Athletic scores in 40% of matches (6 of 15 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).
Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while Hartford Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hartford Athletic
Over / Under - Tampa Bay Rowdies
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tampa Bay Rowdies is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Hartford Athletic · 2 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hartford Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hartford Athletic
Tampa Bay Rowdies
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Hartford Athletic | Liga | Tampa Bay Rowdies | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.73 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 58% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 52% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 26% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 67% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Hartford Athletic 1 - 1 - 3 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
When do Hartford Athletic and Tampa Bay Rowdies play?
Hartford Athletic face Tampa Bay Rowdies on 12 September 2026 in USL Championship. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hartford Athletic and Tampa Bay Rowdies?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Hartford Athletic won 1, Tampa Bay Rowdies won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hartford Athletic vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?
Hartford Athletic score 0.80 goals per game on average and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1.56. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Hartford Athletic's matches and 44% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's.
What form are Hartford Athletic and Tampa Bay Rowdies in?
Over the last 5 games Hartford Athletic have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hartford Athletic vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.