Hartlepool United vs Forest Green Rovers: match statistics
Hartlepool United vs Forest Green Rovers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hartlepool United played Forest Green Rovers in National League (England). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Hartlepool United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Forest Green Rovers: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hartlepool United scores 1.09 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Forest Green Rovers scores 1.73 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hartlepool United 40%, Forest Green Rovers 66%. Over 2.5: Hartlepool United 37%, Forest Green Rovers 50%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Forest Green Rovers has higher xG: 1.96 vs 1.47. Hartlepool United: 11.5 shots per match, Forest Green Rovers: 16.2.
Match halves
Hartlepool United: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.67. Forest Green Rovers: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Hartlepool United: 76-90+ (12 goals). Forest Green Rovers: 61-75 (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National League: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (2): Forest Green Rovers possess a clear offensive advantage — 76 goals scored this season vs 47 for Hartlepool and 12 goals in the last 5 matches vs 3 for the hosts. The visitors generate more high-quality chances: average away xG 1.63 vs Hartlepool’s 1.55 xG, with average on-target shots 5.0 vs 3.9 and conversion 11% vs 9%, all indicating greater attacking efficiency for Forest Green. Hartlepool’s season average conceded at home is 0.9 goals, but they have shipped 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per game), while Forest Green conceded 5 (1.0 per game), highlighting a significant defensive form imbalance for the hosts. Additionally, the visitors average 2 points in their last 5 matches vs 1 point for the hosts and have won 3 of those 5 fixtures compared to Hartlepool’s 1 win, therefore I rate Forest Green’s win probability at 60%, draw 20% and home win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high season BTTS rates: Hartlepool 68% and Forest Green 64%, both above the league level of 56%, which is a strong signal for BTTS - Yes. Hartlepool at home averages 2.0 goals per match and xG 2.29 with 6.91 shots on target, while Forest Green this season has 1.45 goals and xG 1.63 with 5.0 shots on target — the home side creates more chances, but the visitors also have goal-scoring potential. Looking at the last 5 matches, Hartlepool scored 3 and conceded 12 (avg 0.6 scored and 2.4 conceded), and Forest Green scored 12 and conceded 5 (avg 2.4 scored and 1.0 conceded), which increases the likelihood of goals from the visitors. Additionally, low clean sheet percentages 27% (Hartlepool) and 23% (Forest Green) indicate both teams rarely keep the opponent out, and the home side’s above-average attack with xG 2.29 plus a home advantage of 18% strengthen the BTTS Yes scenario. Therefore I assess BTTS probability at 68% for Yes and 32% for No, selecting 'yes' as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model estimates expected goals of 1.83 for Hartlepool and 1.34 for Forest Green (total 3.17), calculated as the average of each team’s attack and the opponent’s defense based on xG: 2.29 (Hartlepool xG) vs 1.37 (xG against Forest Green) and 1.63 (Forest Green xG) vs 1.05 (xG against Hartlepool). Hartlepool averages 19.55 shots and 6.91 on target per match, Forest Green 12.86 and 5.0, with conversion rates of 10% and 11% respectively, supporting the likelihood of multiple goals in the game. This season Hartlepool’s matches have exceeded 1.5 goals in 86% of cases and Forest Green’s in 82%; over 2.5 goals occurred in 55% and 45% of their matches respectively, yielding estimated probabilities of over1.5 ≈82% and over2.5 ≈61%. In the last 5 matches Hartlepool scored 3 goals (0.6 avg) and conceded 12 (2.4), while Forest Green scored 12 (2.4) and conceded 5 (1.0), which further supports a high-scoring encounter. Therefore I recommend a play on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (≈82% probability), with an expected total of 3.17 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonally Hartlepool lead at the break in 41% of matches and win 64% of games; additionally their xG is 2.29 versus Forest Green’s 1.63, and average shots are 19.55 vs 12.86 for the visitors, which suggests a clear home advantage in chance creation. In the second half the hosts score on average 1.23 goals and concede only 0.27, winning second halves in 68% of cases, so they have the ability to maintain or extend a lead. However, Forest Green have better form in the last 5 matches (60% wins versus Hartlepool’s 20%) and in that period they led at the break in 40% of games, which increases the risk that the hosts will not be leading after 45 minutes. Considering the seasonal xG advantage, significantly more shots and the hosts’ strong second half, the most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1. Therefore I tip 1/1 as the strongest signal, while acknowledging the lesser probability of a half-time draw with a home win later (X/1) or an away surprise (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hartlepool United | Forest Green Rovers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Forest Green Rovers is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Hartlepool United · 2 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forest Green Rovers is 59% better for: goals scored per match.
1.09 goals / match - Hartlepool United · 1.73 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers
Forest Green Rovers is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Hartlepool United · 1.14 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers
Hartlepool United scores in 63% of matches (27 of 43 matches), while Forest Green Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (11 of 44 matches).
Forest Green Rovers scores in 86% of matches (38 of 44 matches), while Hartlepool United keeps a clean sheet in 40% (17 of 43 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hartlepool United
Over / Under - Forest Green Rovers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forest Green Rovers is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - Hartlepool United · 1.41 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hartlepool United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Forest Green Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hartlepool United
Forest Green Rovers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Hartlepool United | Liga | Forest Green Rovers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.30 | 2.91 | • 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 56% | ▲ 66% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 24% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 71% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 80% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Hartlepool United 0 - 0 - 1 Forest Green Rovers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hartlepool United vs Forest Green Rovers?
The National League match finished Hartlepool United 2:1 Forest Green Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hartlepool United vs Forest Green Rovers?
Hartlepool United score 1.09 goals per game on average and Forest Green Rovers 1.73. The National League average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Hartlepool United's matches and 66% of Forest Green Rovers's.
What form are Hartlepool United and Forest Green Rovers in?
Over the last 5 games Hartlepool United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Forest Green Rovers 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hartlepool United vs Forest Green Rovers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


