Haugesund vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Haugesund vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haugesund played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Haugesund Stadion. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Haugesund: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haugesund scores 3.00 and concedes 1.92 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.42 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haugesund 75%, Kongsvinger 75%. Over 2.5: Haugesund 75%, Kongsvinger 83%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 72%.
xG, shots and style
Haugesund has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.84. Haugesund: 15.2 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 15.6.
Match halves
Haugesund: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.67. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.67.
Goals by minute
Haugesund: 0-15 (9 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.63 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 72%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haugesund holds a clear home advantage: at home they have won 80% of matches and remain unbeaten (0% defeats); in the last 5 games they scored 20 goals (4.0 per game) and are averaging 2.4 points per match in that period. Kongsvinger sit 2nd in the table and have a 50% win rate away, but they average 1.83 goals per away match with xG for 1.69 and 17% of away games without scoring. The hosts are more efficient in finishing chances: at home they average 6.2 shots on target and an 18% conversion rate versus 6 shots on target and 13% conversion for the visitors, which translates to 2.8 goals per game for Haugesund compared to 1.83 for Kongsvinger on the road. Both teams conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches, suggesting an open game, but Haugesund have a lower xG against (1.24 vs 1.62) and a better home goal difference (+9 vs +4 for the visitors). Considering the home record (80% wins), higher finishing efficiency and a slight xG edge, I favor the home side to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes due to strong signals from both teams: Haugesund has a seasonal BTTS rate of 83% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Kongsvinger is 67% for the season and also 80% in their last five. Haugesund averages 3.00 goals per game this season (last 5: 4.0), Kongsvinger 1.83 (last 5: 2.6), and both teams concede 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. xG values confirm the offensive profile: in the last 5 matches xG is 2.18 for Haugesund and 2.10 for Kongsvinger with xG against of 1.35 and 1.41 respectively. Additionally, clean sheet rate is only 17% for both, the league BTTS is 57% with an average of 3.63 goals per game, and Haugesund has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season — all arguments favor Yes. Therefore I assign an 83% probability to BTTS and 17% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics point to a goals match: Haugesund averages 3.00 goals per game, Kongsvinger 1.83, and the league average is 3.63. xG confirms an attacking edge — home xG 1.98, away xG 1.69; comparing against opponent defenses (Kongsvinger concedes xG 1.62, Haugesund concedes xG 1.28) yields an estimate of ~1.80 expected goals for the home side and 1.61 for the visitors, totaling ~3.41. Seasonal trends are clear: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Haugesund has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals, and Kongsvinger 67%; additionally 83% of Haugesund’s home games and 67% of Kongsvinger’s away games see goals from both sides. Based on the above the safest selection is Over 1.5 (strongest signal: 100% of both teams’ season matches >1.5), which I price at ~96%. Over 2.5 also looks favorable (estimated ~75%), while Over 3.5 I assess at ~44% (i.e. Under 3.5 ~56%), so avoid taking risk on the 3.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics show that the visitors more often take the lead at the break — they led in 50% of matches versus 33% for the home side, and the time-distribution gives 6 away goals in the first half (2+3+1) versus 3 goals for Haugesund (0+2+1). At the same time the home team dominates after the break: they scored 15 goals in the second half (7+4+4) compared with 5 away goals (3+1+1), and the second-half goals per match average is 2.5 for Haugesund vs 0.83 for Kongsvinger. This aligns with better chance creation and efficiency for the hosts — xG 1.98 vs 1.69, shots per match 16.67 vs 14.5 and conversion 18% vs 13%, which favors turnarounds. In practice Haugesund wins 83% of games despite being behind at half-time in 50% of cases, indicating frequent comebacks after the break. Therefore the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time scenario is Kongsvinger leading at half-time and Haugesund winning after the break (2/1) — I assign this a 30% probability; next weights are 1/1 (26%) and X/1 (10%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haugesund | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Haugesund is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Haugesund · 2 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haugesund is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
3 goals / match - Haugesund · 2.42 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.92 goals / match - Haugesund · 1.33 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Haugesund scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Haugesund keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haugesund
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haugesund is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / match - Haugesund · 1.42 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haugesund - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 2.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haugesund
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Haugesund | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.92 | 3.63 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 58% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 22% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 92% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 88% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Haugesund vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Haugesund 4:2 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haugesund vs Kongsvinger?
Haugesund score 3.00 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.42. The First Division average is 3.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Haugesund's matches and 75% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Haugesund and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Haugesund have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haugesund vs Kongsvinger?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haugesund vs Kongsvinger: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


