Haugesund vs Moss: match statistics
Haugesund vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haugesund played Moss in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 25 May 2026. Venue: Haugesund Stadion. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Haugesund: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Moss: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haugesund scores 2.88 and concedes 1.63 goals per match. Moss scores 1.63 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haugesund 63%, Moss 75%. Over 2.5: Haugesund 63%, Moss 75%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 71%.
xG, shots and style
Haugesund has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.65. Haugesund: 13.9 shots per match, Moss: 14.3.
Match halves
Haugesund: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.75. Moss: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Haugesund: 0-15 (5 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.56 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 71%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haugesund is the favorite for this match: at home they have a 67% win rate, 0% losses and a positive goal difference of +4, averaging 2.33 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. Moss concedes an average of 2.5 goals per away match and has recorded 0 clean sheets (0%), while averaging 1.75 goals scored and a shot conversion rate of 12%. In the last 5 matches Haugesund scored 13 goals (2.6 per game), Moss scored 8 goals (1.6 per game); both teams, however, have the same points average over this period — 1.4 per game — which indicates comparable form but greater efficiency from the home side. In terms of quality of chances Haugesund averages 1.61 xG at home with xG against 1.46, while Moss generates 1.81 xG away with xG against 1.71; despite the visitors’ slightly higher xG, the hosts convert chances better (conversion 19% vs 12%). Considering the advantage in shot efficiency, more stable home defense and no defeats at home, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a very high BTTS rate this season: Haugesund 75% and Moss 75%, well above the league average of 56%. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of Haugesund games and 80% of Moss games; moreover, recent form shows Haugesund scoring 2.6 and conceding 1.8 on average, while Moss scores 1.6 and concedes 2.2 — both sides regularly score and concede. xG and on-target shot analysis confirm offensive intent: Moss has xG_for 1.81 versus Haugesund’s xG_against 1.63 and more shots on target (6.25 vs 4.0), while Haugesund has xG_for 1.49 against Moss’s xG_against 1.71 — both teams create chances. Additionally, Moss concedes 2.5 goals per match on average this season and has 0% clean sheets, with 100% of Moss matches over 2.5 goals; Haugesund has 25% clean sheets but also 75% BTTS matches, which further supports Goal/Goal. Considering the 75%/75% season BTTS, 60%/80% in the last 5, and Moss’s high xG and conceded stats, I recommend BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 85%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: the home attack xG is 1.49 and the away defense xG is 1.71 — averaging to an expected 1.60 goals for Haugesund; similarly Moss attack xG is 1.81 and the home defense xG is 1.63 — expected 1.72 for the visitors, total 3.32. Season metrics show Over 1.5 occurred in 75% of Haugesund’s matches and 100% of Moss’s (average 87.5%), and both teams have BTTS at 75%, which strongly supports at least two goals in the game. Additionally the league averages 3.56 goals per match, and in the last 5 fixtures the home side scored 13 and conceded 9 (4.4 goals per match combined), the visitors scored 8 and conceded 11 (3.8 per match), so recent form is also high in terms of goals. On this basis I assess Over 1.5 at 92% probability and pick ‘over’ on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 is also strong (78%), considering season figures of 50% for the home team and 100% for the visitors on Over 2.5 and xG=3.32. I conservatively rate Over 3.5 at 44% because the xG total 3.32 is below 3.5, despite Moss historically having 75% of matches over 3.5 and Haugesund 25%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Haugesund led at the break in 50% of their matches, while Moss did not lead at the break in any (50% vs 0%), which strongly favors the home side for Half-Time. The hosts score an average of 0.5 goals by half-time versus 0.25 for the visitors and average 1.75 points at the break compared to 0.25 for Moss, so Haugesund’s lead at the break is visible and statistically significant. After the break Moss score more (1.5 goals on average vs 1.0 for the hosts), but the visitors also concede an average of 2.5 goals per match versus 1.25 for the hosts, which weakens their chances of a turnaround. Additionally, Moss have a higher xG (1.81 vs 1.49), but poorer defense and the fact that Haugesund scored as many as 4 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 1 for the visitors lead to the assessment that the home team will hold the lead; therefore I pick the 1/1 scenario (approx. 38% probability).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haugesund | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haugesund is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
2.88 goals / match - Haugesund · 1.63 goals / match - Moss
Haugesund is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.63 goals / match - Haugesund · 1.88 goals / match - Moss
Haugesund scores in 100% of matches (8 of 8 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
Moss scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Haugesund keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haugesund
Over / Under - Moss
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haugesund is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.88 pts / match - Haugesund · 1 pts / match - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haugesund - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haugesund
Moss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Haugesund | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.50 | 3.56 | • 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 57% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 63% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 22% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 79% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 86% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Haugesund vs Moss?
The First Division match finished Haugesund 3:1 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haugesund vs Moss?
Haugesund score 2.88 goals per game on average and Moss 1.63. The First Division average is 3.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Haugesund's matches and 75% of Moss's.
What form are Haugesund and Moss in?
Over the last 5 games Haugesund have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Moss 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haugesund vs Moss?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


