Havelse vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Havelse played Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 22 November 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Havelse: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Ulm: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Havelse scores 1.14 and concedes 2.29 goals per match. Ulm scores 1.36 and concedes 2.36. League average: 3.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Havelse 79%, Ulm 79%. Over 2.5: Havelse 50%, Ulm 86%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Havelse has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.36. Havelse: 12.6 shots per match, Ulm: 11.1.

Match halves

Havelse: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71. Ulm: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Havelse: 76-90+ (5 goals). Ulm: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3. Liga: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

32Possession (%)68
HavelseUlm
12Shots7
HavelseUlm
6Shots on target3
HavelseUlm
1.43xG0.92
HavelseUlm
6Corners4
HavelseUlm
34Dangerous attacks35
HavelseUlm
19Fouls16
HavelseUlm
3Cards2
HavelseUlm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.14Goals scored / match1.36
HavelseUlm
2.29Goals conceded / match2.36
HavelseUlm
43%Average possession48%
HavelseUlm
3.5Shots on target / match3.5
HavelseUlm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.64Shots per match11.14
HavelseUlm
3.5Shots on target3.5
HavelseUlm
9%Shot conversion12.2%
HavelseUlm
43%Possession48%
HavelseUlm
1.44xG for1.36
HavelseUlm
2.04xG against1.89
HavelseUlm

Shooting quality

Havelse: BalancedUlm: Balanced
HavelseUlm
Accuracy (shots on target)28%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Havelse
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W36% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-5-9
0.36 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-5
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Ulm
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
29% W7% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-9
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.8xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 2.04BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulm is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.14 goals / match - Havelse · 1.36 goals / match - Ulm

Havelse scoring profile: very strong

Havelse scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

Ulm scoring profile: very strong

Ulm scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Havelse keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

16Goals scored (season)19
HavelseUlm
32Goals conceded (season)33
HavelseUlm
3.43Average goals in match3.71
HavelseUlm
6Goals scored (last 5)3
HavelseUlm
13Goals conceded (last 5)19
HavelseUlm

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal86%
HavelseUlm
29%2 goals21%
HavelseUlm
7%3 goals14%
HavelseUlm
0%4 goals7%
HavelseUlm

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal93%
HavelseUlm
64%2 goals64%
HavelseUlm
36%3 goals43%
HavelseUlm
21%4 goals21%
HavelseUlm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time36%
HavelseUlm
7%BTTS in both halves0%
HavelseUlm
7%Scored in both halves14%
HavelseUlm

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS71%
HavelseUlm
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
HavelseUlm
80%BTTS - last 560%
HavelseUlm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
HavelseUlm
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
HavelseUlm
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
HavelseUlm

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
HavelseUlm
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
HavelseUlm
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time43%
HavelseUlm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ulm is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - Havelse · 0.93 pts / match - Ulm

Havelse - half-time state
14% leading36% draw50% trailing
Ulm - half-time state
21% leading29% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)0.93
HavelseUlm
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.64
HavelseUlm
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
HavelseUlm
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.79
HavelseUlm
36%Clean sheet before half-time21%
HavelseUlm
64%No goal before half-time50%
HavelseUlm

After half-time (2nd half)

0.79Points per match (2nd half)0.79
HavelseUlm
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
HavelseUlm
1.36Goals conceded (2nd half)1.21
HavelseUlm
2.07Average goals (2nd half)1.93
HavelseUlm
14%Clean sheet after half-time36%
HavelseUlm
50%No goal after half-time50%
HavelseUlm

Havelse - second-half results

14% W36% R50% P
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ulm - second-half results

14% W36% R50% P
13
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Havelse - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ulm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.62.2
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-6-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Havelse
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Ulm
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
4
7
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
79%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Havelse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Ulm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.93
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

HavelseLigaUlm
Average goals in match 3.433.16 3.71
Both teams scored 79%65% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%63% 86%
Clean sheets 7%21% 7%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 93%
Goal after half-time 93%84% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HavelseGoalEmre AytunAssist: Johann Berger
  2. HavelseYellow cardEmre Aytun
  3. UlmYellow cardLeon Dajaku
  4. HavelseGoalMarko IlicAssist: Lorenzo Paldino
  5. HavelseSubstitutionOn: John PosseltOff: Lorenzo Paldino
  6. UlmYellow cardEvan Anderson Brown
  7. UlmSubstitutionOn: Lucas RöserOff: Ben Westermeier
  8. HavelseSubstitutionOn: Robin MüllerOff: Marko Ilic
  9. UlmGoalMax Brandt
  10. UlmSubstitutionOn: Julian Yao Mawuli EtseOff: Evan Anderson Brown
  11. HavelseYellow cardRobin Müller
  12. HavelseYellow cardTom Opitz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Simon SchreinerMatches officiated: 12
4.42Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 275%Home wins8%Draws17%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Havelse vs Ulm?

The 3. Liga match finished Havelse 2:1 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Havelse vs Ulm?

Havelse score 1.14 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.36. The 3. Liga average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Havelse's matches and 79% of Ulm's.

What form are Havelse and Ulm in?

Over the last 5 games Havelse have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Ulm 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Havelse vs Ulm?

The statistical background for Havelse vs Ulm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.