Haverfordwest County vs Bala Town: match statistics
Haverfordwest County presents better form in the last five matches with a record of 3-1-1 and 2.0 points per match, while Bala Town earns just 0.8 points per match with a record of 1-1-3. The hosts have an advantage in offensive efficiency at home, scoring an average of 1.73 goals per match with an xG of 1.43, as well as a better defense with 1.55 conceded goals against an xG Against of 1.47. Bala Town has poor efficiency in away matches, scoring an average of only 1 goal per match with an xG of 1.1, and their away record stands at merely 36% wins with 64% losses and 0% draws. The goal difference confirms the hosts' advantage (+2) over the guests (-6), which, combined with Bala Town's 45% FTS% rate on the road, suggests difficulties in scoring goals. Taking all factors into account, Haverfordwest County has a real chance of victory, although the form of both teams leaves room for unpredictability in the result.
Haverfordwest County vs Bala Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Haverfordwest County played Bala Town in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The match was played on 13 February 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Haverfordwest County: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Bala Town: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Haverfordwest County scores 1.42 and concedes 1.63 goals per match. Bala Town scores 0.96 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Haverfordwest County 46%, Bala Town 38%. Over 2.5: Haverfordwest County 58%, Bala Town 38%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Haverfordwest County has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.09. Haverfordwest County: 10.9 shots per match, Bala Town: 8.0.
Match halves
Haverfordwest County: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.04. Bala Town: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Haverfordwest County: 76-90+ (13 goals). Bala Town: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Welsh Premier League: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haverfordwest County presents better form in the last five matches with a record of 3-1-1 and 2.0 points per match, while Bala Town earns just 0.8 points per match with a record of 1-1-3. The hosts have an advantage in offensive efficiency at home, scoring an average of 1.73 goals per match with an xG of 1.43, as well as a better defense with 1.55 conceded goals against an xG Against of 1.47. Bala Town has poor efficiency in away matches, scoring an average of only 1 goal per match with an xG of 1.1, and their away record stands at merely 36% wins with 64% losses and 0% draws. The goal difference confirms the hosts' advantage (+2) over the guests (-6), which, combined with Bala Town's 45% FTS% rate on the road, suggests difficulties in scoring goals. Taking all factors into account, Haverfordwest County has a real chance of victory, although the form of both teams leaves room for unpredictability in the result.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Haverfordwest County | Bala Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Haverfordwest County is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Haverfordwest County · 0.8 pts / match - Bala Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haverfordwest County is 48% better for: goals scored per match.
1.42 goals / match - Haverfordwest County · 0.96 goals / match - Bala Town
Bala Town is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.63 goals / match - Haverfordwest County · 1.46 goals / match - Bala Town
Haverfordwest County scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Bala Town keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
Bala Town scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while Haverfordwest County keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haverfordwest County
Over / Under - Bala Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haverfordwest County - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Bala Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Haverfordwest County
Bala Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Haverfordwest County | Liga | Bala Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.04 | 3.07 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 52% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 58% | 57% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 28% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 76% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Haverfordwest County 2 - 0 - 0 Bala Town. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Haverfordwest County vs Bala Town?
The Welsh Premier League match finished Haverfordwest County 3:0 Bala Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Haverfordwest County and Bala Town?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Haverfordwest County won 2, Bala Town won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Haverfordwest County vs Bala Town?
Haverfordwest County score 1.42 goals per game on average and Bala Town 0.96. The Welsh Premier League average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Haverfordwest County's matches and 38% of Bala Town's.
What form are Haverfordwest County and Bala Town in?
Over the last 5 games Haverfordwest County have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Bala Town 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haverfordwest County vs Bala Town?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.