Heart of Lions vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Heart of Lions played Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 27 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Heart of Lions: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Medeama: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Heart of Lions scores 1.13 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Medeama scores 1.43 and concedes 0.71. League average: 1.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Heart of Lions 33%, Medeama 57%. Over 2.5: Heart of Lions 33%, Medeama 43%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.41. Heart of Lions: 9.5 shots per match, Medeama: 15.5.

Match halves

Heart of Lions: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.60. Medeama: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Heart of Lions: 76-90+ (5 goals). Medeama: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 1.84 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Heart of LionsMedeama
9Shots8
Heart of LionsMedeama
3Shots on target2
Heart of LionsMedeama
1.12xG0.9
Heart of LionsMedeama
3Corners3
Heart of LionsMedeama
47Dangerous attacks35
Heart of LionsMedeama
10Fouls9
Heart of LionsMedeama
3Cards1
Heart of LionsMedeama

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Heart of LionsMedeama
1.13Goals scored / match1.43
Heart of LionsMedeama
0.73Goals conceded / match0.71
Heart of LionsMedeama
51%Average possession58%
Heart of LionsMedeama
3.13Shots on target / match6.07
Heart of LionsMedeama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.47Shots per match15.5
Heart of LionsMedeama
3.13Shots on target6.07
Heart of LionsMedeama
12%Shot conversion9.2%
Heart of LionsMedeama
51%Possession58%
Heart of LionsMedeama
1.41xG for1.71
Heart of LionsMedeama
1.34xG against1.12
Heart of LionsMedeama

Shooting quality

Heart of Lions: BalancedMedeama: Dominant
Heart of LionsMedeama
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama is 350% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Heart of Lions · 1.8 pts / match - Medeama

Heart of Lions
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W33% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-4
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Medeama
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W43% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-1
1.93 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Heart of Lions · 1.43 goals / match - Medeama

Heart of Lions scoring profile: strong

Heart of Lions scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

Medeama scoring profile: strong

Medeama scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Heart of Lions keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 matches).

17Goals scored (season)20
Heart of LionsMedeama
11Goals conceded (season)10
Heart of LionsMedeama
1.87Average goals in match2.14
Heart of LionsMedeama
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Heart of LionsMedeama
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Heart of LionsMedeama

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal79%
Heart of LionsMedeama
27%2 goals50%
Heart of LionsMedeama
13%3 goals7%
Heart of LionsMedeama
7%4 goals7%
Heart of LionsMedeama

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal64%
Heart of LionsMedeama
20%2 goals7%
Heart of LionsMedeama
7%3 goals0%
Heart of LionsMedeama
0%4 goals0%
Heart of LionsMedeama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time14%
Heart of LionsMedeama
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Heart of LionsMedeama
20%Scored in both halves36%
Heart of LionsMedeama

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Heart of LionsMedeama
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Heart of LionsMedeama
40%BTTS - last 580%
Heart of LionsMedeama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Heart of LionsMedeama
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Heart of LionsMedeama
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Heart of LionsMedeama

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Heart of LionsMedeama
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Heart of LionsMedeama
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Heart of LionsMedeama

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Heart of Lions - half-time state
33% leading53% draw13% trailing
Medeama - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per match (1st half)1.5
Heart of LionsMedeama
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Heart of LionsMedeama
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Heart of LionsMedeama
0.73Average goals (1st half)1
Heart of LionsMedeama
80%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Heart of LionsMedeama
60%No goal before half-time50%
Heart of LionsMedeama

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.86
Heart of LionsMedeama
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Heart of LionsMedeama
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
Heart of LionsMedeama
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.14
Heart of LionsMedeama
60%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Heart of LionsMedeama
53%No goal after half-time36%
Heart of LionsMedeama

Heart of Lions - second-half results

33% W40% R27% P
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - second-half results

50% W36% R14% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Heart of Lions - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Heart of Lions
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
0
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Heart of Lions

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
242%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

Heart of LionsLigaMedeama
Average goals in match 1.871.84 2.14
Both teams scored 33%34% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%27% 43%
Clean sheets 53%41% 36%
Goal before half-time 53%62% 71%
Goal after half-time 67%60% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.84
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.59
Away goals / match
+112%
Home attack advantage
+53%
Home defence advantage
+45%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MedeamaGoalKingsley Braye

FAQ

What was the result of Heart of Lions vs Medeama?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Heart of Lions 0:1 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Heart of Lions vs Medeama?

Heart of Lions score 1.13 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.43. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Heart of Lions's matches and 57% of Medeama's.

What form are Heart of Lions and Medeama in?

Over the last 5 games Heart of Lions have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Medeama 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heart of Lions vs Medeama?

The statistical background for Heart of Lions vs Medeama — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.