Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueOhene Djan Sports StadiumData current as of 18 October 2026

Hearts of Oak vs Port City: match statistics

Hearts of Oak crest
Hearts of Oak
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Port City crest
Port City

Hearts of Oak vs Port City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hearts of Oak played Port City in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Ohene Djan Sports Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Hearts of Oak: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Port City: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hearts of Oak scores 1.20 and concedes 0.40 goals per match. Port City scores 1.60 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hearts of Oak 20%, Port City 60%. Over 2.5: Hearts of Oak 40%, Port City 40%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Hearts of Oak has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.19. Hearts of Oak: 5.6 shots per match, Port City: 3.0.

Match halves

Hearts of Oak: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Port City: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Hearts of Oak: 46-60 (2 goals). Port City: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Port City sit 3rd and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while sixth-placed Hearts of Oak have won 2, but home advantage favors the hosts. Hearts average 2 goals at home and have yet to concede, although the data covers only 2 matches. Away from home, Port City average just 1 shot on target per match, and their xG is 0.72 compared with the hosts’ 1.53 xG at home. The visitors also allow chances worth an average of 2.6 xG away from home, suggesting that their current average of 0.5 goals conceded may be difficult to sustain. The small sample of matches in these conditions, along with Hearts’ two draws in their last five games, leaves a genuine possibility of the points being shared.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against both teams scoring concerns Port City: away from home, they average 1.0 goals, create chances worth 0.72 xG, and manage just 1 shot on target per match. The visitors have failed to score in 50% of their away games, while Hearts of Oak have conceded an average of just 0.4 goals across their last 5 matches. The hosts have greater attacking potential at home, averaging 2.0 goals scored and 1.67 xG, so the BTTS - No pick here primarily reflects the risk that Port City will fail to score. BTTS - No means that at least one team does not score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw. The data is not conclusive, however: BTTS - Yes landed in 100% of Hearts of Oak’s home matches, and in 60% of Port City’s last 5 games. Despite these arguments for BTTS - Yes, the visitors’ poor chance creation and the hosts’ solid recent defensive form tip the assessment toward BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Hearts of Oak average 2.0 goals and 7.0 shots on target at home, so they should create more chances than Port City, who average 1.0 shot on target away. The visitors allow opponents chances worth 2.60 xG, but none of their away matches have gone Over 2.5 goals. In each team’s last five matches, only 40% ended with at least three goals, while the league average is 2.24 goals. A forecast of 1.65 goals for the hosts and 0.70 for the visitors gives a total of 2.35, making Under 3.5 goals the safest pick; this line has been exceeded in 33% of Hearts of Oak’s home matches and 0% of Port City’s away matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Hearts of Oak leading at the break and holding that advantage until the final whistle: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 2 of their 3 home matches and won 67% of those games. At home, they average 2.0 goals and 7 shots on target, while Port City average 1.0 goal and 1 shot on target away from home. The difference in attacking potential is also reflected in xG: 1.67 for the hosts compared with 0.72 for the visitors, whose opponents record an away xG of 2.60. The prospect of maintaining a potential lead is reinforced by the fact that Port City failed to score after half-time in either of the 2 away matches included. The risk is the visitors’ better overall form across their last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 points compared with the hosts’ 1.6; however, Hearts of Oak’s advantage in the home/away data points to a 1/1 scenario in the HT/FT market.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Hearts of OakPort City
12Shots9
Hearts of OakPort City
6Shots on target6
Hearts of OakPort City
1.48xG1.38
Hearts of OakPort City
2Corners3
Hearts of OakPort City
42Dangerous attacks54
Hearts of OakPort City
20Fouls15
Hearts of OakPort City
0Cards0
Hearts of OakPort City

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hearts of OakPort City
1.2Goals scored / match1.6
Hearts of OakPort City
0.4Goals conceded / match0.8
Hearts of OakPort City
43%Average possession29%
Hearts of OakPort City
3Shots on target / match1
Hearts of OakPort City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.6Shots per match3
Hearts of OakPort City
3Shots on target1
Hearts of OakPort City
21.4%Shot conversion53.3%
Hearts of OakPort City
43%Possession29%
Hearts of OakPort City
1.34xG for1.19
Hearts of OakPort City
1.15xG against1.89
Hearts of OakPort City

Shooting quality

Hearts of Oak: Counter-attackingPort City: Counter-attacking
Hearts of OakPort City
Accuracy (shots on target)54%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.40
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.401.60

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Port City is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Hearts of Oak · 2 pts / match - Port City

Hearts of Oak
WWDLD
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Port City
DWWLW
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Port City is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Hearts of Oak · 1.6 goals / match - Port City

Hearts of Oak is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.4 goals / match - Hearts of Oak · 0.8 goals / match - Port City

Hearts of Oak scoring profile: mixed

Hearts of Oak scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Port City keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Port City scoring profile: mixed

Port City scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Hearts of Oak keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)8
Hearts of OakPort City
2Goals conceded (season)4
Hearts of OakPort City
1.6Average goals in match2.4
Hearts of OakPort City
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Hearts of OakPort City
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
Hearts of OakPort City

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal80%
Hearts of OakPort City
40%2 goals60%
Hearts of OakPort City
20%3 goals20%
Hearts of OakPort City
20%4 goals0%
Hearts of OakPort City

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal80%
Hearts of OakPort City
0%2 goals0%
Hearts of OakPort City
0%3 goals0%
Hearts of OakPort City
0%4 goals0%
Hearts of OakPort City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Hearts of OakPort City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Hearts of OakPort City
20%Scored in both halves40%
Hearts of OakPort City

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Hearts of OakPort City
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Hearts of OakPort City
20%BTTS - last 560%
Hearts of OakPort City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Hearts of OakPort City
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Hearts of OakPort City
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Hearts of OakPort City

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Hearts of OakPort City
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Hearts of OakPort City
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Hearts of OakPort City

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Port City is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Hearts of Oak · 1.8 pts / match - Port City

Hearts of Oak - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Port City - half-time state
60% leading0% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.8
Hearts of OakPort City
0.4Goals scored (1st half)1
Hearts of OakPort City
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Hearts of OakPort City
0.6Average goals (1st half)1.4
Hearts of OakPort City
80%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Hearts of OakPort City
80%No goal before half-time40%
Hearts of OakPort City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.4
Hearts of OakPort City
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Hearts of OakPort City
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Hearts of OakPort City
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Hearts of OakPort City
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Hearts of OakPort City
60%No goal after half-time40%
Hearts of OakPort City

Hearts of Oak - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Port City - second-half results

20% W80% D0% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hearts of Oak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Port City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hearts of Oak
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Port City
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hearts of Oak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Port City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
211%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

Hearts of OakLigaPort City
Average goals in match▼ 1.602.22▲ 2.40
Both teams scored▼ 20%48%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%43%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▲ 60%32%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%74%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time• 60%61%• 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.22
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
0.76
Away goals / match
+92%
Home attack advantage
+48%
Home defence advantage
+44%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Hearts of OakGoalFrank Abora Duku

FAQ

What was the result of Hearts of Oak vs Port City?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Hearts of Oak 1:0 Port City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hearts of Oak vs Port City?

Hearts of Oak score 1.20 goals per game on average and Port City 1.60. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Hearts of Oak's matches and 60% of Port City's.

What form are Hearts of Oak and Port City in?

Over the last 5 games Hearts of Oak have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Port City 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hearts of Oak vs Port City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.