Hebar 1918 vs Marek: match statistics
Hebar 1918 vs Marek: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hebar 1918 played Marek in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Hebar 1918: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Marek: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hebar 1918 scores 1.33 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Marek scores 0.83 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hebar 1918 57%, Marek 40%. Over 2.5: Hebar 1918 57%, Marek 33%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Marek has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.36. Hebar 1918: 10.3 shots per match, Marek: 10.4.
Match halves
Hebar 1918: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67. Marek: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Hebar 1918: 31-45+ (10 goals). Marek: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win because Hebar has a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 12.33 shots per match, of which 5.47 are on target, and have an average xG of 1.66 versus the visitors who away average 7.33 shots, 4.67 on target and xG 1.18. Hebar scores on average 1.33 goals per home match with a conversion rate of around 11%, while Marek scores only 0.47 goals on average away and fail to score in 53% of away fixtures. At the same time the hosts have a weak defense — they concede an average of 2.07 goals in home matches and in the last 5 games they have shipped 9 goals while scoring just 5, which translates to 0.8 points on average over that period. The visitors are, however, in better form: Marek has averaged 2.2 points in the last 5 matches, winning 3 and drawing 2, scoring 6 and conceding only 1, and keeps a clean sheet in 40% of away games. Considering the superior quality of the hosts’ chance creation and higher goals average (1.33 vs 0.47) alongside their defensive vulnerability (2.07 conceded), I expect a Hebar victory but in a tight game, hence the probability distribution: 50% home, 25% draw and 25% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data show Hebar averages 1.2 goals per game with xG 1.83, while Marek only averages 0.47 goals per game with xG 1.18, so the hosts are the primary source of goal threat. Marek fails to score in 53% of matches and his season BTTS rate is just 27%, whereas Hebar has BTTS 53% and fails to score in only 20% of matches, meaning Marek is more often the side left goalless. In the last 5 matches Hebar conceded 9 goals (1.8 avg), and Marek scored 6 goals (1.2 avg); however Marek has only a 20% BTTS in those 5 games and averages 4.67 shots on target with a 6% conversion. Hebar generates significantly more chances (7.0 shots on target, 13.4 attempts and 9% conversion) and has xG 1.83 versus the xG Marek typically concedes at 1.87, suggesting the hosts are most likely to score while Marek is inefficient. Considering the strong no-goal signal for Marek (53% FTS and 27% BTTS) and Hebar’s creation advantage, I tip BTTS = No with probability 70% versus 30% for Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals calculated as the average of attack strength and defensive weakness: Hebar has xG_for 1.83 at home, while Marek concedes xG_against 1.87 away, yielding expected Hebar goals ≈1.85; Marek has xG_for 1.18 versus Hebar xG_against 1.23, i.e. ≈1.21, and the combined total ≈3.06 goals, above the league average 2.49. Hebar averages 13.4 shots and 7.0 on target at home with a 9% conversion and 1.2 goals per game, while Marek posts 7.33 shots, 4.67 on target, 6% conversion and only 0.47 goals away — indicating a clear attacking advantage for the home side. Season stats support Over 1.5: Hebar has 67% of matches over 1.5, Marek 53%; Over 2.5 occurs less frequently (40% and 27%), but in the last 5 games Hebar records Over 2.5 in 60% of matches. A Poisson model with combined λ≈3.06 yields roughly 81% probability for Over 1.5, about 59% for Over 2.5 and about 37% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5 — highest probability and xG and shot advantage support this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1), because Hebar averages 1.2 goals per home match versus Marek’s 0.47 away. This is corroborated by xG figures: Hebar has an xG of 1.83 compared to Marek’s 1.18, a substantial advantage in shots (13.4 vs. 7.33), and a higher home points average (1.53 vs. 0.93). A draw at the break is realistic — Hebar reached half-time level in 60% of matches, Marek were level at the break in 33%, yielding an aggregate perspective of roughly a 50% chance of a HT draw. Additionally, Hebar scores on average 0.73 goals after the break while Marek only 0.2, so the home side’s advantage typically materializes in the second half, which is why X/1 receives the highest probability (25%), with alternatives being 1/1 (21%) and X/X (20%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hebar 1918 | Marek | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 56% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.14 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Marek is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Hebar 1918 · 2.2 pts / match - Marek
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hebar 1918 is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Hebar 1918 · 0.83 goals / match - Marek
Marek is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Hebar 1918 · 1.13 goals / match - Marek
Hebar 1918 scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Marek keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
Marek scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Hebar 1918 keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hebar 1918
Over / Under - Marek
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Marek is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.87 pts / match - Hebar 1918 · 1.07 pts / match - Marek
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hebar 1918 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Marek - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hebar 1918
Marek
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Hebar 1918 | Liga | Marek | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.49 | ▼ 1.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 46% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 45% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 33% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 70% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Hebar 1918GoalTodor Chavorski
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Hebar 1918 0 - 0 - 1 Marek. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hebar 1918 vs Marek?
The Second League match finished Hebar 1918 1:1 Marek. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hebar 1918 vs Marek?
Hebar 1918 score 1.33 goals per game on average and Marek 0.83. The Second League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Hebar 1918's matches and 40% of Marek's.
What form are Hebar 1918 and Marek in?
Over the last 5 games Hebar 1918 have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Marek 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hebar 1918 vs Marek?
The statistical background for Hebar 1918 vs Marek — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


