Bulgaria - Second LeagueData current as of 21 September 2026

Hebar 1918 vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics

Hebar 1918 crest
Hebar 1918
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Vihren Sandanski crest
Vihren Sandanski
130%(2.60)
X25%(3.20)
245%(2.41)

Vihren Sandanski displays significantly better form and league position (3rd place) compared to Hebar 1918 (9th place). The visitors have an impressive record of 42% away wins and only 17% of matches without scoring a goal, which demonstrates their offensive efficiency. Hebar 1918 records poor results at home with 55% losses in home matches and only 27% wins, making them one of the weakest hosts in the league. Vihren has a better shot conversion rate (20% vs 10%) and solid form in their last five matches (2.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG). Despite the hosts' possession advantage (56%), their finishing inefficiency and weak defense (averaging 2.09 goals conceded at home) speak in favor of the visitors. Considering all statistical data, Vihren Sandanski has a real chance of securing a victory on difficult ground.

Hebar 1918 vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hebar 1918 played Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Hebar 1918: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Vihren Sandanski: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hebar 1918 scores 1.36 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski scores 1.83 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hebar 1918 59%, Vihren Sandanski 50%. Over 2.5: Hebar 1918 59%, Vihren Sandanski 54%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Vihren Sandanski has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.39. Hebar 1918: 10.2 shots per match, Vihren Sandanski: 12.2.

Match halves

Hebar 1918: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64. Vihren Sandanski: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Hebar 1918: 31-45+ (8 goals). Vihren Sandanski: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vihren Sandanski displays significantly better form and league position (3rd place) compared to Hebar 1918 (9th place). The visitors have an impressive record of 42% away wins and only 17% of matches without scoring a goal, which demonstrates their offensive efficiency. Hebar 1918 records poor results at home with 55% losses in home matches and only 27% wins, making them one of the weakest hosts in the league. Vihren has a better shot conversion rate (20% vs 10%) and solid form in their last five matches (2.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG). Despite the hosts' possession advantage (56%), their finishing inefficiency and weak defense (averaging 2.09 goals conceded at home) speak in favor of the visitors. Considering all statistical data, Vihren Sandanski has a real chance of securing a victory on difficult ground.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Hebar displays very strong goal-scoring potential at home (2.08 goals/match; xG 2.12; 10.83 shots on target), while Vihren has a noticeably weaker defense (1.67 goals conceded/match; xG against 1.77; only 25% clean sheets), which strongly supports the hosts scoring. However, the key factor for BTTS is that Hebar has clearly worsened defensively in their last 5 matches (1.6 goals conceded/match), and Vihren has been scoring consistently in the same period (1.8 goals/match) with a low rate of matches without a goal (FTS 17%). Moreover, both teams have a 60% BTTS rate in their last 5 matches, indicating a current trend of games with goals from both sides. The counter-argument is Hebar's seasonally strong defense (0.67 goals conceded/match and 50% clean sheets), but their current defensive form weakens this signal. Overall, the most probable scenario is a goal from Hebar and at least one reply from Vihren.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Hebar 1918 generates a very high offensive output at home (2.08 goals per match and 2.12 xG), and additionally takes many shots (15.0) and on target (10.83), which supports the scenario of at least 2 goals in the match. Vihren has a weaker defence (1.67 goals conceded and 1.77 xG against per match), which raises the goal expectations for the hosts. On the other hand, Hebar has solid defensive parameters (0.67 goals conceded, 50% clean sheets), so I estimate the visitors' contribution moderately, although they often score a goal during the season (83% of matches with a goal). The over profiles of both teams are positive for the 1.5 line (67% and 83%), and the last 5 matches indicate increased volatility and more frequent 3+ outcomes (Over 2.5: 80% and 60%). Combined, this gives an expected 2.85 goals and the highest confidence for betting on Over 1.5, with simultaneously moderate risk for entering very high lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Hebar displays clearly superior quality and dominance metrics: xG for 2.12 vs 1.21 and xG against 1.07 vs 1.77, alongside a massive advantage in shots (15.0 vs 7.83) and shots on target (10.83 vs 4.33). On a seasonal level, the hosts combine high goal scoring (2.08) with a very low concession rate (0.67) and a 67% win rate, while Vihren concedes an average of 1.67 goals. In terms of the first half, both teams frequently are level at the break (50% each), which increases the probability of a Draw (X) at HT, even though Hebar rarely trails at halftime (8%). After the break, Hebar is strong in terms of results (ppg_2hg 1.92, cs_2hg 83%), and Vihren tends to concede more often (conceded_2hg_avg 0.92), favoring Hebar's ability to 'seal' the victory in the second half. Therefore, the most data-consistent outcome is a draw at half-time and a Hebar win in full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
8Shots8
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
2Shots on target2
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
1.19xG1.12
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
5Corners1
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
75Dangerous attacks64
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
-1Fouls-1
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
-1Cards-1
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
1.36Goals scored / match1.83
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
1.73Goals conceded / match1.17
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
55%Average possession51%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
5.59Shots on target / match7.58
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.23Shots per match12.21
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
5.59Shots on target7.58
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
13.3%Shot conversion15%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
55%Possession51%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
1.39xG for1.69
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
1.25xG against1.4
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

Shooting quality

Hebar 1918: Efficient finishingVihren Sandanski: Efficient finishing
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
Accuracy (shots on target)55%62%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vihren Sandanski is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Hebar 1918 · 2 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski

Hebar 1918
LWWWL
Season result split
36% W18% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-10
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Vihren Sandanski
WDWWL
Season result split
54% W21% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-6
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vihren Sandanski is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

1.36 goals / match - Hebar 1918 · 1.83 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski

Vihren Sandanski is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Hebar 1918 · 1.17 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski

Hebar 1918 scoring profile: strong

Hebar 1918 scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 matches).

Vihren Sandanski scoring profile: very strong

Vihren Sandanski scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Hebar 1918 keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

30Goals scored (season)44
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
38Goals conceded (season)28
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
3.09Average goals in match3
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
8Goals scored (last 5)9
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal75%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
45%2 goals58%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
9%3 goals29%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
5%4 goals8%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal63%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
59%2 goals42%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
32%3 goals13%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
0%4 goals0%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Vihren Sandanski - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 24 matches
45%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time33%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
9%BTTS in both halves17%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
14%Scored in both halves33%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
60%BTTS - last 560%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vihren Sandanski is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - Hebar 1918 · 1.5 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski

Hebar 1918 - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing
Vihren Sandanski - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.5
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.92
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.5
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
36%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
64%No goal before half-time42%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.54
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
45%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski
50%No goal after half-time50%
Hebar 1918Vihren Sandanski

Hebar 1918 - second-half results

32% W32% D36% L
20
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vihren Sandanski - second-half results

38% W42% D21% L
36
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding164%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hebar 1918 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Vihren Sandanski - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hebar 1918
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
4
4
16-30
8
9
31-45
1
4
46-60
7
4
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Vihren Sandanski
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
7
3
16-30
6
6
31-45
8
4
46-60
7
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hebar 1918

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Vihren Sandanski

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
168%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

Hebar 1918LigaVihren Sandanski
Average goals in match 3.092.48 3.00
Both teams scored 59%45% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%43% 54%
Clean sheets 18%32% 38%
Goal before half-time 77%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 86%74% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Yanko Atanasov Angelov⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Hebar 1918GoalYanko Atanasov Angelov

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Hebar 1918 0 - 0 - 1 Vihren Sandanski. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Vihren Sandanski
3 : 2
FK Hebar 1918 Pazardzhik

FAQ

What was the result of Hebar 1918 vs Vihren Sandanski?

The Second League match finished Hebar 1918 1:0 Vihren Sandanski. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hebar 1918 vs Vihren Sandanski?

Hebar 1918 score 1.36 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 1.83. The Second League average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Hebar 1918's matches and 50% of Vihren Sandanski's.

What form are Hebar 1918 and Vihren Sandanski in?

Over the last 5 games Hebar 1918 have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hebar 1918 vs Vihren Sandanski?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hebar 1918 vs Vihren Sandanski: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.