Netherlands - EredivisieAbe Lenstra StadionData current as of 01 November 2026

Heerenveen vs NEC: match statistics

Heerenveen crest
Heerenveen
1 : 0half-time 0:0
NEC crest
NEC

Heerenveen vs NEC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Heerenveen played NEC in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Abe Lenstra Stadion. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Heerenveen: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. NEC: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Heerenveen scores 1.80 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. NEC scores 1.70 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Heerenveen 40%, NEC 90%. Over 2.5: Heerenveen 60%, NEC 80%. League level: BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

NEC has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.71. Heerenveen: 15.3 shots per match, NEC: 15.9.

Match halves

Heerenveen: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.10. NEC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Heerenveen: 16-30 (4 goals). NEC: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eredivisie: 3.78 goals per match, BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Heerenveen sit 7th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while NEC, 12th in the table, have managed just 1 win and recorded 4 draws over the same period. The hosts scored 11 goals and conceded 4 in those five matches, while the visitors scored 10 and conceded 8, pointing to Heerenveen’s stronger recent defensive record. At home, Heerenveen average 1.70 xG and 5.4 shots on target per match, compared with NEC’s 1.35 xG and 4.25 shots on target away from home. The visitors can still make their chances count, averaging 2 goals away with a 17% shot conversion rate, so a win for them cannot be ruled out. Heerenveen’s edge in the quality of chances created and recent defensive form makes them the more appealing pick, although NEC’s four draws in their last five matches increase the likelihood of the points being shared.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS occurred in 100% of Heerenveen’s home matches and 75% of NEC’s away matches, pointing to goals from both teams. The hosts score an average of 1.5 goals at home, while the visitors concede 1.5 on the road; additionally, Heerenveen’s xG is 2.16, indicating the potential to create chances. NEC score an average of 2.0 goals away from home, while Heerenveen concede 2.0 at home, so the visitors also have a strong chance of getting on the scoresheet. Heerenveen’s form warrants some caution: BTTS landed in only 20% of their last 5 matches, and they conceded an average of 0.8 goals. Even so, NEC recorded BTTS in each of their last 5 matches, and neither team kept a clean sheet in their respective home and away games, making BTTS - Yes the stronger pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

All of Heerenveen’s home matches and NEC’s away matches so far have featured at least two goals, making Over 1.5 the strongest indicator. Heerenveen average 1.5 goals scored and 2.0 conceded at home, while NEC average 2.0 scored and 1.5 conceded away, pointing to scoring potential for both sides. The hosts’ attack is also supported by an average xG of 2.16, although their actual conversion rate is lower. The 2.5-goal line also looks promising—it has been surpassed in 83% of Heerenveen’s home matches and 75% of NEC’s away matches—but offers a smaller margin of safety than the selected Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Heerenveen led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while NEC failed to lead in any and conceded an average of 1.4 goals before half-time. This points to the home side leading at the break, although their longer-term record is less convincing: they did not lead at half-time in any of their six matches. Heerenveen’s recent form supports them maintaining their advantage, with 3 wins in 5 matches and an average of 2.2 goals scored, compared with NEC’s 1.6 goals conceded. The hosts also average 2.16 xG against the visitors’ 1.35, strengthening the case for 1/1 in the HT/FT market. The risk of a draw remains significant, as NEC have drawn 4 of their last 5 matches and won the second half in 3 of them.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
HeerenveenNEC
8Shots21
HeerenveenNEC
2Shots on target2
HeerenveenNEC
0.85xG1.93
HeerenveenNEC
5Corners7
HeerenveenNEC
27Dangerous attacks64
HeerenveenNEC
7Fouls7
HeerenveenNEC
3Cards3
HeerenveenNEC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.8Goals scored / match1.7
HeerenveenNEC
1.3Goals conceded / match1.8
HeerenveenNEC
52%Average possession60%
HeerenveenNEC
5.8Shots on target / match4.7
HeerenveenNEC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.3Shots per match15.9
HeerenveenNEC
5.8Shots on target4.7
HeerenveenNEC
11.8%Shot conversion10.7%
HeerenveenNEC
52%Possession60%
HeerenveenNEC
1.71xG for1.83
HeerenveenNEC
1.62xG against1.23
HeerenveenNEC

Shooting quality

Heerenveen: AttackingNEC: Dominant
HeerenveenNEC
Accuracy (shots on target)38%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Heerenveen is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Heerenveen · 0.8 pts / match - NEC

Heerenveen
DWLWW
Season result split
40% W30% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-3
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
NEC
LDDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W50% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-3
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Heerenveen is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Heerenveen · 1.7 goals / match - NEC

Heerenveen is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Heerenveen · 1.8 goals / match - NEC

Heerenveen scoring profile: very strong

Heerenveen scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Heerenveen keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

18Goals scored (season)17
HeerenveenNEC
13Goals conceded (season)18
HeerenveenNEC
3.1Average goals in match3.5
HeerenveenNEC
11Goals scored (last 5)6
HeerenveenNEC
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
HeerenveenNEC

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal90%
HeerenveenNEC
60%2 goals50%
HeerenveenNEC
30%3 goals20%
HeerenveenNEC
20%4 goals10%
HeerenveenNEC

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal100%
HeerenveenNEC
60%2 goals60%
HeerenveenNEC
10%3 goals20%
HeerenveenNEC
0%4 goals0%
HeerenveenNEC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time50%
HeerenveenNEC
0%BTTS in both halves20%
HeerenveenNEC
40%Scored in both halves40%
HeerenveenNEC

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS70%
HeerenveenNEC
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
HeerenveenNEC
20%BTTS - last 580%
HeerenveenNEC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
HeerenveenNEC
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time70%
HeerenveenNEC
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
HeerenveenNEC

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
HeerenveenNEC
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
HeerenveenNEC
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
HeerenveenNEC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Heerenveen is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Heerenveen · 1.1 pts / match - NEC

Heerenveen - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
NEC - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.1
HeerenveenNEC
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.7
HeerenveenNEC
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)1
HeerenveenNEC
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.7
HeerenveenNEC
70%Clean sheet before half-time20%
HeerenveenNEC
50%No goal before half-time40%
HeerenveenNEC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.6
HeerenveenNEC
1.1Goals scored (2nd half)1
HeerenveenNEC
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
HeerenveenNEC
2Average goals (2nd half)1.8
HeerenveenNEC
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
HeerenveenNEC
40%No goal after half-time30%
HeerenveenNEC

Heerenveen - second-half results

40% W30% D30% L
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

NEC - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
11
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Heerenveen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Heerenveen
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

NEC
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Heerenveen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

HeerenveenLigaNEC
Average goals in match▼ 3.103.78▼ 3.50
Both teams scored▼ 40%73%▲ 90%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 60%73%▲ 80%
Clean sheets▲ 40%14%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%80%▲ 90%
Goal after half-time• 90%90%▼ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.78
Average goals per match
73%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
1.75
Home goals / match
2.03
Away goals / match
+-14%
Home attack advantage
+-16%
Home defence advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
68%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
20%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NECYellow cardClement Bischoff
  2. HeerenveenYellow cardOliver Johansen Braude
  3. NECYellow cardBryan Linssen
  4. HeerenveenYellow cardVasilios Zagaritis
  5. HeerenveenYellow cardMarcus Linday
  6. HeerenveenSubstitutionOn: Ringo MeerveldOff: Maxence Rivera
  7. HeerenveenGoalDylan VenteAssist: Levi Smans
  8. NECSubstitutionOn: Gabriel Costa BrásOff: Tobias Storm
  9. NECYellow cardAyodele Thomas
  10. NECSubstitutionOn: Adam TahauiOff: Kevin Kers
  11. HeerenveenSubstitutionOn: Marko Lawk FarjiOff: Jacob Trenskow

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Heerenveen 1 - 1 - 0 NEC. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie
2 : 2
SC Heerenveen
SC Heerenveen
3 : 2
Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie

FAQ

What was the result of Heerenveen vs NEC?

The Eredivisie match finished Heerenveen 1:0 NEC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Heerenveen and NEC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Heerenveen won 1, NEC won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Heerenveen vs NEC?

Heerenveen score 1.80 goals per game on average and NEC 1.70. The Eredivisie average is 3.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Heerenveen's matches and 90% of NEC's.

What form are Heerenveen and NEC in?

Over the last 5 games Heerenveen have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and NEC 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heerenveen vs NEC?

The statistical background for Heerenveen vs NEC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.