Lithuania - A LygaData current as of 31 August 2026

Hegelmann Litauen vs Banga: match statistics

Hegelmann Litauen crest
Hegelmann Litauen
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Banga crest
Banga

Hegelmann Litauen vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hegelmann Litauen played Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Hegelmann Litauen: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Banga: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hegelmann Litauen scores 1.04 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Banga scores 1.48 and concedes 0.84. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hegelmann Litauen 64%, Banga 36%. Over 2.5: Hegelmann Litauen 44%, Banga 44%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Banga has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.12. Hegelmann Litauen: 9.1 shots per match, Banga: 12.2.

Match halves

Hegelmann Litauen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.52. Banga: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.84.

Goals by minute

Hegelmann Litauen: 16-30 (6 goals). Banga: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-4. Average goals 1.71, BTTS 14%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Banga sit 4th, while Hegelmann Litauen are eighth, and the visitors’ overall season record stands at 12 wins and just 7 defeats, compared with the hosts’ 4 wins and 10 losses. Recent form also favors Banga: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals during that run, whereas Hegelmann have lost 4 of their last 5 games, conceding as many as 12 goals. Away from home, Banga concede an average of just 0.64 goals per match, keep a clean sheet in 43% of their appearances, and boast a positive goal difference of +9. Hegelmann draw very frequently at home, doing so in 62% of their matches, but win only 15% of them, while their xG stands at 1.25 compared with 1.47 xG conceded to opponents. Banga create more high-quality chances away from home, posting an average xG of 1.47, so despite the risk of a closely contested match, they have clearly greater chances of securing the win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data more clearly supports the BTTS - No option: Hegelmann’s BTTS rate stands at 45%, while Banga’s is just 29%, compared with a league average of 49%. Banga have been particularly solid defensively, conceding an average of only 0.64 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 43% of their games, which increases the risk of the hosts failing to score. Hegelmann average 1.73 goals at home, but Banga have also failed to score in 43% of their matches, making a scoreless away performance a realistic scenario. Recent form raises the BTTS probability to 60% for both teams across their last five matches; however, Hegelmann’s low xG of 0.89 during this period limits the strength of the signal for a home goal. Therefore, BTTS - No holds a slight edge, meaning that at least one team will finish the match without scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals: over the course of the season, this outcome occurred in 73% of Hegelmann’s matches and 71% of Banga’s. Banga concede just 0.64 goals per match on average and kept a clean sheet in 43% of their appearances, limiting the hosts’ potential despite their average of 1.73 goals scored. On the other hand, Hegelmann’s last five matches have been notably weaker defensively, with an average of 2.4 goals conceded, while Banga scored 1.8 goals per game during that period. The combined projected xG of approximately 2.50, together with the fact that Over 3.5 goals occurred in only 27% and 29% of the teams’ matches respectively, points towards a controlled result with no more than three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Banga were level at the break in 57% of their matches, compared with 36% for Hegelmann. The visitors concede just 0.43 goals per match before half-time, while the hosts average 0.82 goals scored in this period, favouring a cautious opening. After the interval, Banga show greater stability: they average 0.79 goals and keep a clean sheet in 79% of second halves, compared with Hegelmann conceding 0.55 goals. Current form also clearly favours Banga, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.8 points, while Hegelmann have lost 4 of their 5 games and conceded an average of 2.4 goals. The X/2 scenario is also supported by the fact that the hosts were trailing at half-time in as many as 60% of their last five first halves, while Banga often settle matches only after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
9Shots17
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
3Shots on target6
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
1.01xG1.81
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
5Corners4
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
31Dangerous attacks42
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
9Fouls10
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
3Cards3
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hegelmann LitauenBanga
1.04Goals scored / match1.48
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
1.64Goals conceded / match0.84
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
43%Average possession46%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
2.96Shots on target / match4.12
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.12Shots per match12.16
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
2.96Shots on target4.12
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
11.4%Shot conversion12.2%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
43%Possession46%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
1.12xG for1.39
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
1.48xG against1.25
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

Shooting quality

Hegelmann Litauen: BalancedBanga: Counter-attacking
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banga is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.8 pts / match - Banga

Hegelmann Litauen
LWLLL
Season result split
16% W44% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-11-10
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-8-3
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.90Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Banga
WLWLW
Season result split
48% W24% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-7
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-4
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banga is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.48 goals / match - Banga

Banga is 95% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 0.84 goals / match - Banga

Hegelmann Litauen scoring profile: strong

Hegelmann Litauen scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).

Banga scoring profile: very strong

Banga scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).

26Goals scored (season)37
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
41Goals conceded (season)21
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
2.68Average goals in match2.32
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
12Goals conceded (last 5)8
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal64%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
24%2 goals48%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
12%3 goals24%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
0%4 goals8%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal64%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
48%2 goals16%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
16%3 goals4%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
8%4 goals0%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
Hegelmann Litauen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 25 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time20%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
12%BTTS in both halves4%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
20%Scored in both halves32%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
60%BTTS - last 560%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Banga is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.32 pts / match - Banga

Hegelmann Litauen - half-time state
24% leading48% draw28% trailing
Banga - half-time state
28% leading48% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.32
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
1.32Average goals (1st half)1.12
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
48%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
60%No goal before half-time60%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

After half-time (2nd half)

0.96Points per match (2nd half)1.8
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
40%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga
52%No goal after half-time44%
Hegelmann LitauenBanga

Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results

16% W48% R36% P
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Banga - second-half results

52% W24% R24% P
33
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hegelmann Litauen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Banga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hegelmann Litauen
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
4
10
31-45
4
4
46-60
6
8
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Banga
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
7
1
16-30
4
8
31-45
7
1
46-60
5
3
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hegelmann Litauen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Hegelmann LitauenLigaBanga
Average goals in match 2.682.66 2.32
Both teams scored 64%49% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%53% 44%
Clean sheets 16%31% 36%
Goal before half-time 68%71% 60%
Goal after half-time 72%77% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BangaGoalMisaki Sato
  2. Hegelmann LitauenYellow cardNathan Vitor de Almeida Silva
  3. BangaYellow cardVaidas Magdušauskas
  4. Hegelmann LitauenGoalDonatas Kazlauskas
  5. BangaYellow cardDovydas Norvilas
  6. Hegelmann LitauenSubstitutionOn: Andrius KaulinisOff: Donatas Kazlauskas
  7. Hegelmann LitauenYellow cardLukas Paukštė

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Hegelmann Litauen 2 - 1 - 4 Banga. Average goals 1.71, both teams scored in 14% matches.

Banga
2 : 0
Hegelmann Litauen
Banga
2 : 1
Hegelmann Litauen
Hegelmann Litauen
0 : 2
Banga
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
0 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 1
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
2 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
2 : 0
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas

FAQ

What was the result of Hegelmann Litauen vs Banga?

The A Lyga match finished Hegelmann Litauen 1:1 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hegelmann Litauen and Banga?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Hegelmann Litauen won 2, Banga won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 14% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hegelmann Litauen vs Banga?

Hegelmann Litauen score 1.04 goals per game on average and Banga 1.48. The A Lyga average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Hegelmann Litauen's matches and 36% of Banga's.

What form are Hegelmann Litauen and Banga in?

Over the last 5 games Hegelmann Litauen have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Banga 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hegelmann Litauen vs Banga?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.