Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: match statistics
Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hegelmann Litauen played Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 6 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Hegelmann Litauen: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Panevėžys: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hegelmann Litauen scores 0.64 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Panevėžys scores 0.91 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hegelmann Litauen 45%, Panevėžys 55%. Over 2.5: Hegelmann Litauen 36%, Panevėžys 55%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Panevėžys has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.13. Hegelmann Litauen: 9.6 shots per match, Panevėžys: 10.1.
Match halves
Hegelmann Litauen: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.36. Panevėžys: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.27.
Goals by minute
Hegelmann Litauen: 31-45+ (2 goals). Panevėžys: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 60%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I project a draw: the hosts register as many as 67% draws in home matches and average 0.83 goals scored per home game with 0.83 conceded, suggesting low-scoring affairs. The visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 7 goals in that span, but away they concede 2.17 goals per game on average and have an average xG against of 1.91, indicating significant defensive risk. Panevėžys averages 3.33 shots on target per away match versus the hosts' 2.67 SOT at home, and a conversion rate of 9% versus 8% gives the visitors a slight finishing edge. In terms of chance quality, the hosts have home xG for 1.23 and xG against 1.55, while the visitors have xG for 1.06 and xG against 1.91, so both teams create few high-quality chances and the visitors’ defense looks weaker. Considering this, I back a draw; I expect a low-scoring game (0:0 or 1:1).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis favors BTTS - Yes: Hegelmann has a season BTTS of 60% and Panevėžys 50%, both above the league average of 42%. Panevėžys concedes 2.17 goals per game on the season, while Hegelmann records xG_for 1.29, so the hosts have a realistic chance to score against a vulnerable away defense (xG_against_away 1.91). Hegelmann has recently been conceding an average of 2.2 goals in the last 5 matches (11 conceded), and Panevėžys is scoring an average of 1.4 goals in that period (7 in 5), which increases the visitors' chance to find the net. Shot stats: Hegelmann averages 4.0 shots on target and 10.8 total, Panevėžys 3.33 on target and 8.83 total; with a conversion rate of 9% at these volumes of chances, the probability that both teams score rises. In summary, based on season BTTS 60% vs 50%, last 5-match dynamics and xG/SOT, I assess BTTS - Yes at 65% and No Goal at 35%, therefore pick: 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total combined xG is around 2.75: Hegelmann has an attacking xG of 1.29 versus Panevėžys’s conceded xG of 1.91, yielding ~1.60 expected goals for the home side; Panevėžys has attacking xG 1.06 against the home side’s conceded xG 1.24, giving ~1.15 for the visitors. Season averages show the home side scores 1.0 and concedes 0.8, while the visitors score 0.83 and concede 2.17, indicating Panevėžys has bigger defensive issues. In the last 5 matches the home team scored 5 and conceded 11 (avg 2.2 conceded per game), while the visitors scored 7 and conceded 6 (1.2 conceded), which increases the risk of multiple goals. Season percentages of matches over 2.5 are 40% for the home side and 67% for the visitors, and the home team had 80% of their last 5 matches over 2.5; the combined xG of 2.75 therefore translates to roughly a 76% chance of Over 1.5 and about 52% for Over 2.5. Considering the combined xG, the high BTTS rates (60% for the home side and 50% for the visitors) and recent form, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommend Over at the 1.5 line).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hegelmann holds a clear numerical advantage this season: the home side averages 1.00 goals scored and concedes 0.80 per match, while Panevėžys averages 0.83 goals scored and concedes 2.17 per match, which favors the hosts. At half-time Hegelmann scores on average 0.60 goals and keep a clean sheet in the first half in 60% of matches, whereas the visitors concede on average 1.00 goal before the break and have only 33% first-half clean sheets; the hosts led at the break in 40% of matches versus 33% for the visitors. Home xG is 1.29 compared to 1.91 non-home xG against Panevėžys, and the hosts average 10.8 shots (4.0 on target) versus 8.83 (3.33 on target) for the visitors, meaning Hegelmann creates more chances against a weaker defense. Although Panevėžys have better recent form in the last 5 matches (60% wins), the visitors’ season metrics are only 33% wins and 67% losses with an average of 2.17 goals conceded, so the strongest scenario is the hosts leading at the break and winning by full-time (HT/FT 1/1); I estimate this scenario at approximately 36%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hegelmann Litauen | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Panevėžys is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.2 pts / match - Panevėžys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Panevėžys is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
0.64 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 0.91 goals / match - Panevėžys
Hegelmann Litauen is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.45 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.55 goals / match - Panevėžys
Hegelmann Litauen scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
Panevėžys scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hegelmann Litauen
Over / Under - Panevėžys
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Panevėžys is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.45 pts / match - Panevėžys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Panevėžys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hegelmann Litauen
Panevėžys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Hegelmann Litauen | Liga | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.09 | 2.56 | ▼ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 45% | 42% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 54% | • 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 36% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 74% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Hegelmann Litauen 3 - 1 - 1 Panevėžys. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?
The A Lyga match finished Hegelmann Litauen 3:2 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Hegelmann Litauen won 3, Panevėžys won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?
Hegelmann Litauen score 0.64 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.91. The A Lyga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Hegelmann Litauen's matches and 55% of Panevėžys's.
What form are Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys in?
Over the last 5 games Hegelmann Litauen have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Panevėžys 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?
The statistical background for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


