Lithuania - A LygaData current as of 07 September 2026

Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: match statistics

Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hegelmann Litauen played Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 6 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Hegelmann Litauen: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Panevėžys: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hegelmann Litauen scores 0.64 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Panevėžys scores 0.91 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hegelmann Litauen 45%, Panevėžys 55%. Over 2.5: Hegelmann Litauen 36%, Panevėžys 55%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Panevėžys has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.13. Hegelmann Litauen: 9.6 shots per match, Panevėžys: 10.1.

Match halves

Hegelmann Litauen: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.36. Panevėžys: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

Hegelmann Litauen: 31-45+ (2 goals). Panevėžys: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I project a draw: the hosts register as many as 67% draws in home matches and average 0.83 goals scored per home game with 0.83 conceded, suggesting low-scoring affairs. The visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 7 goals in that span, but away they concede 2.17 goals per game on average and have an average xG against of 1.91, indicating significant defensive risk. Panevėžys averages 3.33 shots on target per away match versus the hosts' 2.67 SOT at home, and a conversion rate of 9% versus 8% gives the visitors a slight finishing edge. In terms of chance quality, the hosts have home xG for 1.23 and xG against 1.55, while the visitors have xG for 1.06 and xG against 1.91, so both teams create few high-quality chances and the visitors’ defense looks weaker. Considering this, I back a draw; I expect a low-scoring game (0:0 or 1:1).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis favors BTTS - Yes: Hegelmann has a season BTTS of 60% and Panevėžys 50%, both above the league average of 42%. Panevėžys concedes 2.17 goals per game on the season, while Hegelmann records xG_for 1.29, so the hosts have a realistic chance to score against a vulnerable away defense (xG_against_away 1.91). Hegelmann has recently been conceding an average of 2.2 goals in the last 5 matches (11 conceded), and Panevėžys is scoring an average of 1.4 goals in that period (7 in 5), which increases the visitors' chance to find the net. Shot stats: Hegelmann averages 4.0 shots on target and 10.8 total, Panevėžys 3.33 on target and 8.83 total; with a conversion rate of 9% at these volumes of chances, the probability that both teams score rises. In summary, based on season BTTS 60% vs 50%, last 5-match dynamics and xG/SOT, I assess BTTS - Yes at 65% and No Goal at 35%, therefore pick: 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Total combined xG is around 2.75: Hegelmann has an attacking xG of 1.29 versus Panevėžys’s conceded xG of 1.91, yielding ~1.60 expected goals for the home side; Panevėžys has attacking xG 1.06 against the home side’s conceded xG 1.24, giving ~1.15 for the visitors. Season averages show the home side scores 1.0 and concedes 0.8, while the visitors score 0.83 and concede 2.17, indicating Panevėžys has bigger defensive issues. In the last 5 matches the home team scored 5 and conceded 11 (avg 2.2 conceded per game), while the visitors scored 7 and conceded 6 (1.2 conceded), which increases the risk of multiple goals. Season percentages of matches over 2.5 are 40% for the home side and 67% for the visitors, and the home team had 80% of their last 5 matches over 2.5; the combined xG of 2.75 therefore translates to roughly a 76% chance of Over 1.5 and about 52% for Over 2.5. Considering the combined xG, the high BTTS rates (60% for the home side and 50% for the visitors) and recent form, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommend Over at the 1.5 line).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Hegelmann holds a clear numerical advantage this season: the home side averages 1.00 goals scored and concedes 0.80 per match, while Panevėžys averages 0.83 goals scored and concedes 2.17 per match, which favors the hosts. At half-time Hegelmann scores on average 0.60 goals and keep a clean sheet in the first half in 60% of matches, whereas the visitors concede on average 1.00 goal before the break and have only 33% first-half clean sheets; the hosts led at the break in 40% of matches versus 33% for the visitors. Home xG is 1.29 compared to 1.91 non-home xG against Panevėžys, and the hosts average 10.8 shots (4.0 on target) versus 8.83 (3.33 on target) for the visitors, meaning Hegelmann creates more chances against a weaker defense. Although Panevėžys have better recent form in the last 5 matches (60% wins), the visitors’ season metrics are only 33% wins and 67% losses with an average of 2.17 goals conceded, so the strongest scenario is the hosts leading at the break and winning by full-time (HT/FT 1/1); I estimate this scenario at approximately 36%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
12Shots14
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
7Shots on target5
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.52xG1.52
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
5Corners6
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
39Dangerous attacks41
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
15Fouls11
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
4Cards2
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.64Goals scored / match0.91
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.45Goals conceded / match1.55
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
46%Average possession47%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.45Shots on target / match3.73
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.55Shots per match10.09
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.45Shots on target3.73
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
6.7%Shot conversion9%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
46%Possession47%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.13xG for1.19
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.58xG against1.64
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Shooting quality

Hegelmann Litauen: BalancedPanevėžys: Balanced
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)26%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Panevėžys is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.2 pts / match - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen
WLDLL
Season result split
9% W55% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-6-4
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Panevėžys
LWLLW
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-5
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Panevėžys is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

0.64 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 0.91 goals / match - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.55 goals / match - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen scoring profile: strong

Hegelmann Litauen scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

7Goals scored (season)10
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
16Goals conceded (season)17
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.09Average goals in match2.45
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal64%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
9%2 goals27%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
9%3 goals0%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0%4 goals0%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal82%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
36%2 goals27%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
18%3 goals27%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
9%4 goals18%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Hegelmann Litauen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 11 matches
42%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time27%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
9%Scored in both halves0%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
40%BTTS - last 560%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.45 pts / match - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.45
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.82Average goals (1st half)1.36
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
73%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
73%No goal before half-time55%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)0.91
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.09
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
36%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
73%No goal after half-time82%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results

18% W27% R55% P
14
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding33%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panevėžys - second-half results

18% W36% R45% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hegelmann Litauen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hegelmann Litauen
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hegelmann Litauen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Hegelmann LitauenLigaPanevėžys
Average goals in match 2.092.56 2.45
Both teams scored 45%42% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%54% 55%
Clean sheets 27%36% 18%
Goal before half-time 55%70% 73%
Goal after half-time 73%74% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Hegelmann LitauenGoalMatijus RemeikisAssist: Esmilis Kaušinis
  2. Hegelmann LitauenGoalNjoya Abdel KaderAssist: Esmilis Kaušinis
  3. Hegelmann LitauenYellow cardCarlos Duke
  4. PanevėžysGoalOleksandr KurtsevAssist: Strahinja Kerkez
  5. Hegelmann LitauenYellow cardMatijus Remeikis
  6. Hegelmann LitauenGoalMatijus Remeikis
  7. PanevėžysYellow cardIsaac Asante
  8. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Elivelto Ribeiro DantasOff: Jerôme Simon
  9. Hegelmann LitauenSubstitutionOn: Andrius KaulinisOff: Esmilis Kaušinis
  10. Hegelmann LitauenYellow cardDonatas Kazlauskas
  11. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Marko BačaninOff: Ernestas Burdzilauskas
  12. Hegelmann LitauenYellow cardSamuel Yves Oum Gwet
  13. PanevėžysYellow cardStrahinja Kerkez
  14. Hegelmann LitauenSubstitutionOn: Rimvydas SadauskasOff: Wesley Gabriel Freire Arcanjo
  15. PanevėžysGoalIsaac Asante

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Vilius PaulauskasMatches officiated: 8
5.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 263%Home wins25%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Hegelmann Litauen 3 - 1 - 1 Panevėžys. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Panevėžys
1 : 1
Hegelmann Litauen
FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
3 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
3 : 0
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
2 : 1
FK Panevėžys

FAQ

What was the result of Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished Hegelmann Litauen 3:2 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Hegelmann Litauen won 3, Panevėžys won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

Hegelmann Litauen score 0.64 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.91. The A Lyga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Hegelmann Litauen's matches and 55% of Panevėžys's.

What form are Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games Hegelmann Litauen have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Panevėžys 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

The statistical background for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.