Lithuania - A LygaData current as of 08 September 2026

Hegelmann Litauen vs Žalgiris: match statistics

Hegelmann Litauen crest
Hegelmann Litauen
2 : 3half-time 1:1
Žalgiris crest
Žalgiris

Hegelmann Litauen vs Žalgiris: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hegelmann Litauen played Žalgiris in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 27 July 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Hegelmann Litauen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Žalgiris: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hegelmann Litauen scores 1.05 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Žalgiris scores 1.50 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hegelmann Litauen 64%, Žalgiris 45%. Over 2.5: Hegelmann Litauen 41%, Žalgiris 59%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Žalgiris has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.14. Hegelmann Litauen: 9.6 shots per match, Žalgiris: 13.9.

Match halves

Hegelmann Litauen: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.50. Žalgiris: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Hegelmann Litauen: 16-30 (6 goals). Žalgiris: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 3-2-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (2) due to a clear superiority in form and defense. Žalgiris have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals while conceding only 3, equating to 2.6 points per game over that period, whereas Hegelmann have 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses and just 0.4 points per game. The visitors generate higher-quality chances: average xG for Žalgiris away is 1.64 versus 1.29 xG for the home side at home, they also record more shots on average (14.73 vs 10.82) and slightly more shots on target (4.09 vs 3.82). The defensive differential is decisive — Hegelmann have conceded 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per game), while Žalgiris have conceded only 3 (0.6 per game) and concede on average 0.64 goals away with a 64% clean sheet rate. Nonetheless, the hosts draw frequently at home (73% draws in home matches), so a draw remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The main signal against BTTS - Yes is Žalgiris’ away form: BTTS only 18% and clean sheet in 64% of matches with an average of 0.64 goals conceded per game. Hegelmann at home has a seasonal 73% of matches with both teams scoring and averages 2.0 goals scored (xG 1.53), but in the last 5 matches he has scored only 3 goals (0.6 per game) and his recent xG is 0.98, indicating a clear drop in attack. Žalgiris scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per game) and conceded 3 (0.6 per game), so their likelihood of scoring is high, while Hegelmann has been conceding an average of 2.4 goals in that period. The seasonal difference in efficiency (Hegelmann 15% shot conversion vs Žalgiris 7%) gives the home side a theoretical advantage in converting chances, but the high rate of clean sheets for the visitors and the home team’s poor goal output over the last 5 matches lower the probability of BTTS - Yes, therefore the advantage favors the “No Goal” scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

After analyzing xG and goal averages, I expect an open game: home xG is 1.53 against away defensive xG 1.17, yielding expected home goals ~1.35; away xG 1.64 vs home defensive xG 1.48 yields expected away goals ~1.56, totaling ~2.91 goals. Seasonal stats confirm goal pressure: home team have 91% of matches with over 1.5 goals, away 55%, so the 1.5 line clearly favors Over (I assign 86% here). The 2.5 line is also supported: homes have 82% Over 2.5, aways 36%, and in the last 5 matches the away side scored 11 goals while the homes conceded 12, which boosts the chance of Over 2.5 (~63%). Signals for 3.5 are weaker: homes have 55% Over 3.5, aways 0%, so I estimate ~33% for Over 3.5 and prefer Under 3.5. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high value 91%/55% and expected 2.91 goals), hence the recommendation: Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I forecast a Half-Time draw and a Žalgiris victory at Full-Time (X/2). In their last five matches Žalgiris have won 80% of games while Hegelmann have not recorded a win (80% vs 0%), giving the visitors a clear advantage late in matches. Half-Time statistics show Hegelmann led in 0% of their last five appearances, Žalgiris led in 20%, and a draw at the break occurred in 60–80% of cases, so a Half-Time draw is the most probable scenario. xG favors the visitors 1.64 to 1.53, and the average goals in the last five matches are 2.2 for Žalgiris vs 0.6 for Hegelmann, which suggests the visitors will decide the match after the break. Additionally, the hosts scored on average 0.2 goals before Half-Time and conceded 1.2 in their last five matches, weakening their chances of holding a lead; therefore the X/2 pick appears strongest.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
9Shots24
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
4Shots on target8
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
1.31xG2.71
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
6Corners10
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
64Dangerous attacks89
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
15Fouls8
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
0Cards3
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
1.05Goals scored / match1.5
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
1.55Goals conceded / match1.09
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
43%Average possession56%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
2.95Shots on target / match4.27
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.55Shots per match13.95
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
2.95Shots on target4.27
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
11%Shot conversion10.7%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
43%Possession56%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
1.14xG for1.58
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
1.45xG against1.32
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

Shooting quality

Hegelmann Litauen: BalancedŽalgiris: Balanced
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Žalgiris is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 2 pts / match - Žalgiris

Hegelmann Litauen
DLDLW
Season result split
18% W50% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-11-7
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-8-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Žalgiris
WLDWW
Season result split
45% W23% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-7
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Žalgiris is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.5 goals / match - Žalgiris

Žalgiris is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.55 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.09 goals / match - Žalgiris

Hegelmann Litauen scoring profile: strong

Hegelmann Litauen scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).

Žalgiris scoring profile: very strong

Žalgiris scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

23Goals scored (season)33
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
34Goals conceded (season)24
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
2.59Average goals in match2.59
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal73%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
23%2 goals41%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
14%3 goals32%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
0%4 goals5%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal59%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
41%2 goals32%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
14%3 goals18%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
9%4 goals0%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
Hegelmann Litauen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 matches
48%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time18%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
9%BTTS in both halves5%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
18%Scored in both halves27%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
60%BTTS - last 520%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Žalgiris is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.5 pts / match - Žalgiris

Hegelmann Litauen - half-time state
27% leading50% draw23% trailing
Žalgiris - half-time state
36% leading41% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.5
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.77
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.18
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
55%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
59%No goal before half-time45%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
1.32Average goals (2nd half)1.41
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
41%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris
55%No goal after half-time55%
Hegelmann LitauenŽalgiris

Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results

18% W45% R36% P
29
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Žalgiris - second-half results

32% W36% R32% P
33
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hegelmann Litauen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Žalgiris - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hegelmann Litauen
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
7
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Žalgiris
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
7
3
16-30
9
5
31-45
7
5
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hegelmann Litauen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Žalgiris

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Hegelmann LitauenLigaŽalgiris
Average goals in match 2.592.60 2.59
Both teams scored 64%48% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%54% 59%
Clean sheets 18%32% 41%
Goal before half-time 64%69% 73%
Goal after half-time 73%76% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Hegelmann LitauenGoalDominykas Pašilys
  2. ŽalgirisGoalLiviu Ion Antal
  3. ŽalgirisYellow cardGrigore Ioan Turda
  4. ŽalgirisYellow cardDeividas Šešplaukis
  5. Hegelmann LitauenSubstitutionOn: Andrius KaulinisOff: Donatas Kazlauskas
  6. Hegelmann LitauenGoalWesley Gabriel Freire Arcanjo
  7. ŽalgirisSubstitutionOn: Nikola PetkovićOff: Liviu Ion Antal
  8. Hegelmann LitauenSubstitutionOn: Artem ShchedryOff: Dominykas Pašilys
  9. ŽalgirisGoalNikola Petković
  10. ŽalgirisGoalNikola Petković

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Hegelmann Litauen 3 - 2 - 1 Žalgiris. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Žalgiris
1 : 3
Hegelmann Litauen
Hegelmann Litauen
0 : 0
Žalgiris
VMFD Žalgiris Vilnius
3 : 1
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
2 : 2
VMFD Žalgiris Vilnius
VMFD Žalgiris Vilnius
0 : 1
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
2 : 1
VMFD Žalgiris Vilnius

FAQ

What was the result of Hegelmann Litauen vs Žalgiris?

The A Lyga match finished Hegelmann Litauen 2:3 Žalgiris. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hegelmann Litauen and Žalgiris?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Hegelmann Litauen won 3, Žalgiris won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hegelmann Litauen vs Žalgiris?

Hegelmann Litauen score 1.05 goals per game on average and Žalgiris 1.50. The A Lyga average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Hegelmann Litauen's matches and 45% of Žalgiris's.

What form are Hegelmann Litauen and Žalgiris in?

Over the last 5 games Hegelmann Litauen have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Žalgiris 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hegelmann Litauen vs Žalgiris?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hegelmann Litauen vs Žalgiris: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.