Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Dalian Huayi: match statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Dalian Huayi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Heilongjiang Lava Spring played Dalian Huayi in China League One (China). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Dalian Huayi: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.53 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Dalian Huayi scores 1.31 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 82%, Dalian Huayi 63%. Over 2.5: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 59%, Dalian Huayi 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Dalian Huayi has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.29. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.3 shots per match, Dalian Huayi: 11.4.
Match halves
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.88. Dalian Huayi: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (5 goals). Dalian Huayi: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Heilongjiang Lava Spring have greater attacking potential at home, averaging 1.38 goals with an xG of 1.52, while Dalian Huayi score just 1.00 goals away from home and record an xG of 1.30. The hosts also register more shots on target at their own stadium, averaging 5.00 compared with the visitors’ 2.71, and enjoy more possession (54% to 43%). Both defenses are vulnerable, as Heilongjiang concede 1.75 goals per home game and Dalian concede 1.71 away from home, with neither side recording a clean sheet in any of these matches. However, the hosts’ form is poor, with 0 wins and 16 goals conceded in their last 5 matches, which significantly increases the likelihood of a draw. Nevertheless, Dalian have lost 71% of their league away matches and failed to score in as many as 43% of them, so the hosts have a marginally higher chance of winning.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “Yes” pick is supported by the high seasonal rate of matches in which both teams score: 67% for Heilongjiang and 57% for Dalian, compared with the league average of 54%. The hosts average 1.56 goals scored, while Dalian concede as many as 1.71 per match and have not kept a single clean sheet this season. Heilongjiang, meanwhile, have conceded 16 goals in their last five matches—3.2 per game—with opponents recording an average xG of 1.94 against them. Dalian are not particularly clinical, averaging 1.00 goal and failing to score in 43% of their matches, but the hosts’ poor recent defensive form significantly increases their chances of finding the net. The most likely scenario is therefore one in which the hosts exploit the visitors’ defensive vulnerability, while Dalian respond with at least one goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The home side scores an average of 1.56 goals per match, while Dalian Huayi concedes as many as 1.71, which clearly strengthens the case for a Heilongjiang goal. The away team has not kept a single clean sheet, while at least 2 goals were scored in 71% of its matches. Heilongjiang has conceded 16 goals in its last five matches, averaging 3.2 per game, with an xG against of 1.94, so the visitors should also create opportunities to score. The combined projected xG for both sides is 2.87, compared with a league average of 2.63 goals, supporting a match scenario with at least two goals. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as this line has been surpassed in 78% of the home side's matches and 71% of the away team's matches this season.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point, as Heilongjiang were level after 45 minutes in 7 of their 9 matches, or 78% of the time. Dalian should also not dominate decisively from the outset: they average 0.86 goals before the break, compared with 0.89 for the hosts, although the hosts’ last five matches produced a half-time deficit in as many as 60% of cases. After the interval, the advantage shifts towards the visitors, as Heilongjiang conceded an average of 2.0 goals in the second half across their last five matches, while their overall average of goals conceded is as high as 3.2. The hosts are winless in their last five appearances and have collected just 0.4 points per match during that run, whereas Dalian average 1.0 point and lost 40% of those matches, compared with 60% for their opponents. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time and a Dalian win at full-time best combines Heilongjiang’s strong tendency towards level first halves with their significantly weaker defensive performance after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Dalian Huayi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dalian Huayi is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1 pts / match - Dalian Huayi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.31 goals / match - Dalian Huayi
Dalian Huayi is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.5 goals / match - Dalian Huayi
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Dalian Huayi keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
Dalian Huayi scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Over / Under - Dalian Huayi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dalian Huayi is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.25 pts / match - Dalian Huayi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Dalian Huayi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Dalian Huayi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Liga | Dalian Huayi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.53 | 2.65 | ▲ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 82% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 27% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 73% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1 - 1 - 1 Dalian Huayi. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Dalian Huayi?
The China League One match finished Heilongjiang Lava Spring 2:1 Dalian Huayi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Dalian Huayi?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1, Dalian Huayi won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Dalian Huayi?
Heilongjiang Lava Spring score 1.53 goals per game on average and Dalian Huayi 1.31. The China League One average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 82% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's matches and 63% of Dalian Huayi's.
What form are Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Dalian Huayi in?
Over the last 5 games Heilongjiang Lava Spring have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Dalian Huayi 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Dalian Huayi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


