Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Guangzhou E-Power: match statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Heilongjiang Lava Spring play Guangzhou E-Power in China League One (China). The match date is 13 June 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Guangzhou E-Power: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.40 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Guangzhou E-Power scores 1.87 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 80%, Guangzhou E-Power 53%. Over 2.5: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 53%, Guangzhou E-Power 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.34. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.9 shots per match, Guangzhou E-Power: 15.9.
Match halves
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73. Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.93.
Goals by minute
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (4 goals). Guangzhou E-Power: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Guangzhou E‑Power sit 2nd in the table, while Heilongjiang Lava Spring are 7th; the visitors have 6 wins this season versus the hosts' 3 and have scored 18 goals compared to 14. In the last 5 matches Guangzhou have scored 8 goals and averaged 1.6 points per game, whereas Heilongjiang have 6 goals and only 0.6 points per game and have failed to win any of those 5 fixtures. Chance quality is similar — average away xG for the visitors is 1.46 versus home xG for the hosts of 1.44 — but defensively the visitors are stronger (conceding 1.25 goals on average away versus 1.4 conceded by the hosts at home), and in the last 5 matches the hosts have conceded 9 goals against 6 for the visitors. The hosts register more on‑target shots at home (4.8 on‑target per game versus 3.5 for the visitors) and have never finished a home match without scoring (0% of home games without a goal), which increases the probability of both teams scoring. Considering the visitors' clearly better points form (1.6 vs 0.6), greater number of wins (6 vs 3) and superior goal difference, an away victory is more likely.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Guangzhou E-Power is 550% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 2.6 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guangzhou E-Power is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.87 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Guangzhou E-Power is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 0.93 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
Guangzhou E-Power scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Over / Under — Guangzhou E-Power
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guangzhou E-Power is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.87 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangzhou E-Power
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Liga | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.07 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 52% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 29% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 71% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1 - 1 - 0 Guangzhou E-Power. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Guangzhou E-Power?
The China League One match finished Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1:3 Guangzhou E-Power. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Guangzhou E-Power?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1, Guangzhou E-Power won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Guangzhou E-Power?
Heilongjiang Lava Spring score 1.40 goals per game on average and Guangzhou E-Power 1.87. The China League One average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's matches and 53% of Guangzhou E-Power's.
What form are Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Guangzhou E-Power in?
Over the last 5 games Heilongjiang Lava Spring have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Guangzhou E-Power 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Guangzhou E-Power?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.