Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Wuxi Wugou: match statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Wuxi Wugou: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Heilongjiang Lava Spring played Wuxi Wugou in China League One (China). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Wuxi Wugou: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.36 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Wuxi Wugou scores 1.55 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 91%, Wuxi Wugou 55%. Over 2.5: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 45%, Wuxi Wugou 36%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Wuxi Wugou has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.35. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.9 shots per match, Wuxi Wugou: 12.2.
Match halves
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.82. Wuxi Wugou: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 31-45+ (3 goals). Wuxi Wugou: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wuxi Wugou appear as the favorites: they sit 4th versus Heilongjiang’s 10th and have a superior goal difference this season 17:11 vs 15:15. The form gap over the last 5 matches is clear — Wuxi have scored 9 goals and remain unbeaten in that period (2-3-0), while Heilongjiang have scored 8 but conceded 13 and are without a win (0-2-3); this translates to 1.8 points per match for the visitors versus 0.4 for the hosts. The home side, however, creates better chances at home (average xG 1.49, 12 shots and 4.83 shots on target with 53% possession), but their defence is unstable — they concede 1.67 goals per match on average and have 0% clean sheets. Wuxi compensate for fewer shots (9 and 3.6 on target) with higher finishing efficiency (16% vs 11%) and a stronger recent defence (1.2 goals conceded per away match on average and only 5 conceded in the last 5), so they hold the edge in conversion and stability. Considering the combination of superior form, shooting efficiency and lower goals conceded, I project an away victory and assign probabilities: 58% to the visitors, 22% draw, 20% home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend BTTS - Yes, because recent form strongly supports both teams scoring: Heilongjiang had BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches, and Wuxi in 80%. In their last 5 games Heilongjiang scored 8 and conceded 13 goals (avg. 1.6 scored and 2.6 conceded), while Wuxi scored 9 and conceded 5 (avg. 1.8 scored and 1.0 conceded), indicating both sides regularly find the net. xG metrics reinforce this: Heilongjiang’s average xG is 1.81 versus Wuxi’s average xG against of 1.55, and Wuxi’s average xG is 1.25 versus xG against by Heilongjiang of 1.16, so both teams have a realistic expectation of scoring at least once. Seasonally both teams have moderate BTTS rates (50% and 60%, league 51%), but key details matter: Wuxi has 0% clean sheets this season (practically always concedes), and Heilongjiang has conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches, which together strongly favor a both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering the 100%/80% in the last 5 matches, the xG relationships (1.81 vs 1.55 and 1.25 vs 1.16), and Heilongjiang’s clear defensive weakness over the last five (13 conceded) combined with Wuxi’s effectiveness (conversion 16% vs hosts’ 11%), I estimate BTTS at 80% and No BTTS at 20%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects expected goals of 1.68 for Heilongjiang (xG_for 1.81 vs xG_against_away 1.55) and 1.21 for Wuxi (xG_for 1.25 vs xG_against_home 1.16), totaling 2.89 goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.89 translates to roughly a 78% probability for Over 1.5 (P(≥2)≈0.78), 55% for Over 2.5 (P(≥3)≈0.55) and 33% for Over 3.5 (P(≥4)≈0.33). Seasonal data support Over 1.5: Heilongjiang have 83% of matches over 1.5, Wuxi 60%, and Over 0.5 is 83% for the home side and 100% for the away side; additionally Wuxi have 0% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches the hosts conceded on average 2.6 goals, while Wuxi produced 1.87 xG across their last five games, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals; therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (~78%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). Heilongjiang has a clear advantage in xG, 1.81 versus 1.25, and in average shots, 14.83 versus 9.0, providing greater offensive potential after the break. The first half may be balanced — the hosts record 33% draws at the break (2 of 6) and 40% HT draws in their last 5 matches, while the visitors led at half-time in 3 of 5 games (60%). Second-half statistics are decisive: the hosts score an average of 0.67 goals after the break and concede only 0.17, whereas the visitors concede 0.8 goals on average in second halves, so the hosts are more likely to execute a turnaround after half-time. For these reasons X/1 is the strongest signal, with alternatives being X/X or 1/1 as less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Wuxi Wugou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wuxi Wugou is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.2 pts / match - Wuxi Wugou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wuxi Wugou is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.55 goals / match - Wuxi Wugou
Wuxi Wugou is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1 goals / match - Wuxi Wugou
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Wuxi Wugou keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
Wuxi Wugou scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Over / Under - Wuxi Wugou
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wuxi Wugou is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.91 pts / match - Wuxi Wugou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wuxi Wugou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 36%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Wuxi Wugou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Heilongjiang Lava Spring | Liga | Wuxi Wugou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.73 | 2.49 | • 2.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 91% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 48% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 28% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 73% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 71% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Wuxi Wugou?
The China League One match finished Heilongjiang Lava Spring 3:3 Wuxi Wugou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Wuxi Wugou?
Heilongjiang Lava Spring score 1.36 goals per game on average and Wuxi Wugou 1.55. The China League One average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 91% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's matches and 55% of Wuxi Wugou's.
What form are Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Wuxi Wugou in?
Over the last 5 games Heilongjiang Lava Spring have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Wuxi Wugou 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Wuxi Wugou?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


