HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC: match statistics
HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
HFX Wanderers FC played Pacific FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
HFX Wanderers FC: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Pacific FC: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
HFX Wanderers FC scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Pacific FC scores 1.50 and concedes 2.50. League average: 2.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: HFX Wanderers FC 50%, Pacific FC 100%. Over 2.5: HFX Wanderers FC 50%, Pacific FC 100%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Pacific FC has higher xG: 1.13 vs 0.71. HFX Wanderers FC: 9.0 shots per match, Pacific FC: 14.0.
Match halves
HFX Wanderers FC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. Pacific FC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
HFX Wanderers FC: 46-60 (1 goals). Pacific FC: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Canadian Premier League: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
HFX Wanderers sit 3rd versus Pacific FC in 7th, and this season they have 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses with 3 goals scored and 2 conceded. In their last 5 matches HFX have scored 8 goals with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, translating to an average of 1.6 points per game in that period. Pacific have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches but have not won any (0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses) and have produced only 0.4 points per game, indicating issues in converting offensive output into points. The hosts’ key advantage is defense: HFX have conceded 5 goals in their last 5 matches, while Pacific have conceded 14; season-to-date HFX have 2 conceded and 3 scored, and Pacific 5 conceded and 3 scored. Considering the superior points average (1.6 vs 0.4), league position (3rd vs 7th) and a markedly more effective defence, I tip the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data for the away side are partially missing, but in the last 5 matches Pacific FC averages 1.8 goals scored and concedes 2.8 goals, indicating activity from both sides. HFX Wanderers have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and concede on average 2.5 goals seasonally with xG against 1.77, so the hosts regularly allow opponent goals. In the last 5 matches HFX have scored 8 and conceded 5, while Pacific have scored 9 and conceded 14, which shows both teams create and leak chances. Additionally, average xG in the last 5 is 0.48 for HFX and 1.29 for Pacific with xG against 1.24 and 1.87 respectively, supporting an expectation of goal exchange. Considering the hosts' seasonal 100% BTTS, the away side's 100% BTTS in the last 5 and the league BTTS level of 56%, I estimate the probability of BTTS - Yes at 72% versus 28% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG from the last 5 matches, expected goals are approximately 1.18 for HFX (xG HFX 0.48, xG against Pacific 1.87 -> (0.48+1.87)/2=1.18) and 1.27 for Pacific (xG Pacific 1.29, xG against HFX 1.24 -> (1.29+1.24)/2=1.27), totaling 2.45 expected goals. Last 5 match data confirm a scoring tendency: HFX scored 8 and conceded 5 (1.6 scored and 1.0 conceded per match), Pacific scored 9 and conceded 14 (1.8 and 2.8 per match), and Pacific’s matches averaged 4.6 goals. Seasonally HFX at home shows 100% of matches over 1.5 and 100% over 2.5 according to the provided data, and the league average is 2.86 goals per match, which is favorable for overs. There is also a noticeable high BTTS and Over rate in recent performances (last5: HFX over2.5=60%, Pacific over2.5=100%), increasing the likelihood of at least 2–3 goals in the game. The away team’s seasonal data are largely empty (many values 0.0), so the estimate is based on the last 5 matches and xG; this explains the caution regarding a prediction over 3.5. Consequently I select OVER on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal (est. OVER1.5=95%, OVER2.5=72%, expected goals 1.18 vs 1.27 = 2.45), because the high frequency of overs and observed averages of 1.6 and 1.8 goals per team give high confidence.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches HFX has a record of 2 wins (40%), 2 draws (40%) and 1 loss (20%), while Pacific has 0 wins (0%), 2 draws (40%) and 3 losses (60%). In those five games the home side averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, whereas the away side averaged 1.8 scored and 2.8 conceded, clearly indicating Pacific’s weaker defense (2.8 goals conceded in the last 5). At half-time the home team led in 2 of 5 matches (40%) and were level in 2 of 5 (40%), while the visitors led in only 1 of 5 (20%), so the strongest HT signal is a draw or a slight home lead. Additionally, HFX scored 1 goal in minutes 46–60 and 2 goals in minutes 61–75 (3 goals after the break in total), suggesting a tendency to decide matches in the second half against teams that concede 2.8 goals on average. For that reason I assess the most likely scenario as Half-Time draw and Full-Time home win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| HFX Wanderers FC | Pacific FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
HFX Wanderers FC is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 2.5 goals / match - Pacific FC
HFX Wanderers FC scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
Pacific FC scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while HFX Wanderers FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - HFX Wanderers FC
Over / Under - Pacific FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
HFX Wanderers FC - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pacific FC - second-half results
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.50 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
HFX Wanderers FC
Pacific FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| HFX Wanderers FC | Liga | Pacific FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.86 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | • 100% | 100% | • 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): HFX Wanderers FC 2 - 1 - 1 Pacific FC. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished HFX Wanderers FC 2:2 Pacific FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between HFX Wanderers FC and Pacific FC?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches HFX Wanderers FC won 2, Pacific FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?
HFX Wanderers FC score 1.50 goals per game on average and Pacific FC 1.50. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 50% of HFX Wanderers FC's matches and 100% of Pacific FC's.
What form are HFX Wanderers FC and Pacific FC in?
Over the last 5 games HFX Wanderers FC have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Pacific FC 0-0-2 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?
The statistical background for HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.