Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

HJK vs Ilves: match statistics

HJK crest
HJK
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Ilves crest
Ilves

HJK vs Ilves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

HJK played Ilves in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

HJK: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ilves: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

HJK scores 1.29 and concedes 0.57 goals per match. Ilves scores 1.33 and concedes 1.83. League average: 2.18 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: HJK 29%, Ilves 83%. Over 2.5: HJK 29%, Ilves 67%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

HJK has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.12. HJK: 11.9 shots per match, Ilves: 9.3.

Match halves

HJK: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.71. Ilves: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

HJK: 31-45+ (3 goals). Ilves: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.18 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 4.75, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

HJK are the favorites: at home they have won 67% of matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals and conceding only 0.33 per game, while Ilves have no away wins (0% wins) and concede 2.00 goals per game on the road. The hosts generate more chances — on average 12.67 shots and 4.67 on target per match with xG 1.53 at home — whereas Ilves register only 9.25 shots and 3.00 on target with xG 1.05 away. The visitors, however, scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches and have a higher shot conversion rate (16% vs 11%), which means they can be dangerous if afforded more opportunities, but their defense leaves gaps (6 goals conceded in the last 5 and 0 clean sheets away). Considering HJK’s superiority in quality of chances and defensive solidity (67% clean sheets at home), I give the hosts a 65% chance to win, 20% for a draw and 15% for an Ilves win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Ilves as the away side has BTTS in 100% of this season’s matches, while HJK at home has BTTS in 50% of matches; over the last 5 games these figures are 60% for Ilves and 40% for HJK, which favors a both teams to score scenario. Ilves averages 1.5 goals across the season and 2.0 goals in the last 5 matches, HJK averages 1.0 seasonally and 1.4 in the last 5, and Ilves concedes 2.0 goals seasonally versus 1.5 for HJK, so Ilves both scores and is more defensively vulnerable. xG analysis shows 1.25 xG for HJK versus 1.05 xG for Ilves, but xG against is 1.35 for HJK and 1.87 for Ilves, meaning Ilves allows more expected scoring chances. Additionally, HJK keeps a clean sheet in 50% of season matches, while Ilves has 0% clean sheets away, and shot conversion is 16% for Ilves versus 11% for HJK, which increases the probability that both teams will score. Given Ilves’ 100% away BTTS, 2.0 average goals for Ilves in the last 5 matches and higher xG against of 1.87, I assess BTTS chance at 75% and No BTTS at 25%, hence recommendation: BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model projects HJK at approximately 1.56 goals (home xG 1.25 and xG conceded by Ilves 1.87 → (1.25+1.87)/2=1.56), and Ilves at approximately 1.20 goals (Ilves xG 1.05 and xG conceded by HJK 1.35 → (1.05+1.35)/2=1.20), totaling 2.76 xG. Ilves has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals this season, HJK 50%, and in the last 5 matches Ilves averages 2.0 goals (10 goals) versus HJK 1.4 goals (7 goals), a combined 3.4 goals based on recent form. Ilves also has 75% of matches over 2.5 goals this season vs 50% for HJK, which makes the 2.5 line moderately likely, but the strongest signal remains on Over 1.5. Additionally, BTTS for Ilves is 100% and for HJK 50%, while average shots and conversion rates (shots on target 3.5 vs 3.0, shot conversion 11% vs 16%) support a scenario of at least two goals, therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the optimal line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back the 2/1 scenario (Ilves leading at the break, HJK winning) because Ilves frequently takes a lead in the first half but fails to maintain it through full-time. In the last five matches Ilves led at the break in 60% of games (3 of 5) and scored an average of 0.75 goals in the first half, while HJK averaged 0.5 first-half goals. Nevertheless, HJK is stronger over the full match – at home they earn an average of 1.5 points per game and win 50% of matches, whereas Ilves have 0% away wins and only 0.5 points per away game. Additionally, HJK produces 1.25 home xG, while Ilves concedes an average of 1.87 xG per match, and the home side registers an average of 3.5 shots on target versus Ilves’ 3.0, which favors a turnaround after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
HJKIlves
15Shots14
HJKIlves
5Shots on target6
HJKIlves
1.9xG1.69
HJKIlves
3Corners4
HJKIlves
83Dangerous attacks53
HJKIlves
11Fouls11
HJKIlves
3Cards1
HJKIlves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match1.33
HJKIlves
0.57Goals conceded / match1.83
HJKIlves
52%Average possession48%
HJKIlves
3.86Shots on target / match3.17
HJKIlves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.86Shots per match9.33
HJKIlves
3.86Shots on target3.17
HJKIlves
10.8%Shot conversion14.3%
HJKIlves
52%Possession48%
HJKIlves
1.42xG for1.12
HJKIlves
1.3xG against1.7
HJKIlves

Shooting quality

HJK: BalancedIlves: Efficient finishing
HJKIlves
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

HJK is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - HJK · 1 pts / match - Ilves

HJK
WDDWL
Season result split
43% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-2
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Ilves
LDLDW
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 away
0-2-2
LDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HJK is 221% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.57 goals / match - HJK · 1.83 goals / match - Ilves

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

9Goals scored (season)8
HJKIlves
4Goals conceded (season)11
HJKIlves
1.86Average goals in match3.17
HJKIlves
6Goals scored (last 5)7
HJKIlves
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
HJKIlves

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal100%
HJKIlves
29%2 goals33%
HJKIlves
29%3 goals0%
HJKIlves
0%4 goals0%
HJKIlves

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal83%
HJKIlves
0%2 goals67%
HJKIlves
0%3 goals33%
HJKIlves
0%4 goals0%
HJKIlves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time17%
HJKIlves
0%BTTS in both halves17%
HJKIlves
29%Scored in both halves17%
HJKIlves

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
HJKIlves
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HJKIlves
40%BTTS - last 580%
HJKIlves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
HJKIlves
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
HJKIlves
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
HJKIlves

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
HJKIlves
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
HJKIlves
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
HJKIlves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.57 pts / match - HJK · 1.67 pts / match - Ilves

HJK - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing
Ilves - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)1.67
HJKIlves
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.67
HJKIlves
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)1
HJKIlves
1Average goals (1st half)1.67
HJKIlves
57%Clean sheet before half-time50%
HJKIlves
43%No goal before half-time33%
HJKIlves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1
HJKIlves
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
HJKIlves
0.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
HJKIlves
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.5
HJKIlves
86%Clean sheet after half-time33%
HJKIlves
57%No goal after half-time50%
HJKIlves

HJK - second-half results

43% W43% R14% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - second-half results

17% W50% R33% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding34%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

HJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

HJK
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+89%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

HJKLigaIlves
Average goals in match 1.862.18 3.17
Both teams scored 29%47% 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%32% 67%
Clean sheets 43%30% 17%
Goal before half-time 86%76% 100%
Goal after half-time 57%74% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.18
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.24
Home goals / match
0.95
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HJKYellow cardVille Tikkanen
  2. HJKSubstitutionOn: Alexander RingOff: Toivo Mero
  3. HJKSubstitutionOn: Lassi LappalainenOff: Alfie Cicale
  4. HJKYellow cardMihajlo Bogićević
  5. HJKSubstitutionOn: Martin KirilovOff: Teemu Pukki
  6. HJKYellow cardMihajlo Bogićević
  7. IlvesYellow cardMaksim Stjopin

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): HJK 1 - 1 - 2 Ilves. Average goals 4.75, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tampereen Ilves
3 : 1
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
2 : 2
Tampereen Ilves
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
5 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 2
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi

FAQ

What was the result of HJK vs Ilves?

The Veikkausliiga match finished HJK 2:2 Ilves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between HJK and Ilves?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches HJK won 1, Ilves won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before HJK vs Ilves?

HJK score 1.29 goals per game on average and Ilves 1.33. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 29% of HJK's matches and 83% of Ilves's.

What form are HJK and Ilves in?

Over the last 5 games HJK have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ilves 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HJK vs Ilves?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for HJK vs Ilves: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.