Houston Dynamo FC II vs Minnesota United II: match statistics
Houston Dynamo FC II vs Minnesota United II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Houston Dynamo FC II played Minnesota United II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Aviva Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Houston Dynamo FC II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Minnesota United II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Houston Dynamo FC II scores 2.09 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Minnesota United II scores 1.35 and concedes 1.57. League average: 3.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Houston Dynamo FC II 61%, Minnesota United II 57%. Over 2.5: Houston Dynamo FC II 65%, Minnesota United II 52%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Houston Dynamo FC II has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.61. Houston Dynamo FC II: 14.3 shots per match, Minnesota United II: 13.7.
Match halves
Houston Dynamo FC II: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.04. Minnesota United II: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Houston Dynamo FC II: 16-30 (13 goals). Minnesota United II: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-2. Average goals 3.80, BTTS 80%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Houston Dynamo FC II have a clear home advantage: they win 73% of their home matches, score an average of 2.36 goals and concede just 0.55. Minnesota United II lose 58% of their away games, score only 1.08 goals per match and allow opponents an average of 1.67 goals. The hosts create more high-quality chances, recording a home xG of 1.75 compared with Minnesota’s 1.41 away from home, while also averaging 5.91 shots on target against 2.83 for the visitors. Particularly concerning is Minnesota’s poor attacking consistency, as they fail to score in 42% of away fixtures, whereas Houston draw a blank in just 9% of their home appearances. Both teams have identical records across their last five matches—1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats—but their season-long home and away figures strongly favour the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is supported by the profile of both teams: Houston have landed this outcome in 64% of their matches this season, while Minnesota have done so in 80% of their last five games. The hosts create an average of 1.82 xG and register 5.73 shots on target per match, while Minnesota concede an average of 1.67 goals and allow opponents 1.68 xG. The visitors have shown weaker attacking consistency over the season, averaging 1.08 goals and failing to score in 42% of matches, but their recent xG has risen to 1.64, while Houston conceded 1.6 goals across their last five games. Additionally, both teams conceded 1.6 and 1.4 goals respectively over their last five league fixtures, increasing the likelihood that each side will exploit defensive gaps. The probability of BTTS - Yes is therefore higher than that of the BTTS - No outcome, which means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Houston averages 1.82 xG per match, while Minnesota allows opponents 1.68 xG and concedes an average of 1.67 goals, clearly strengthening the outlook for a home goal. The visitors score an average of 1.08 goals, but Houston has conceded 1.6 goals per match across its last five fixtures, while Minnesota’s xG over the same period stands at a solid 1.64. The 1.5 line has been surpassed in 82% of Houston’s matches and 67% of Minnesota’s, while the league records a high average of 3.29 goals per match. The teams’ last five appearances have also produced 3.2 and 2.6 total goals per match, respectively, making Over 1.5 the market best supported by the data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Houston have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 36% of their matches, compared with just 17% for Minnesota, who have gone into half-time trailing in as many as 58% of games. In their last five outings, the hosts have been ahead at half-time in 60% of matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goal and conceding just 0.4, while the visitors have not led at the break once and have conceded an average of 1.0 goal. Houston’s advantage is also evident in chance creation over the course of the match: their average xG stands at 1.82 compared with the opponents’ 1.41, while the hosts record 5.73 shots on target per game against Minnesota’s 2.83. Minnesota lose 58% of their matches this season and concede an average of 1.67 goals, so if Houston take the lead, the hosts should be well placed to hold on to the result. The 1/1 scenario is the most likely, although Houston’s high draw rate of 36% also increases the chances of a second-half turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Houston Dynamo FC II | Minnesota United II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Houston Dynamo FC II is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
2.09 goals / match - Houston Dynamo FC II · 1.35 goals / match - Minnesota United II
Houston Dynamo FC II is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Houston Dynamo FC II · 1.57 goals / match - Minnesota United II
Houston Dynamo FC II scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Minnesota United II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
Minnesota United II scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Houston Dynamo FC II keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Houston Dynamo FC II
Over / Under - Minnesota United II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Houston Dynamo FC II is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.04 pts / match - Houston Dynamo FC II · 1.13 pts / match - Minnesota United II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Houston Dynamo FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Minnesota United II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Houston Dynamo FC II
Minnesota United II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Houston Dynamo FC II | Liga | Minnesota United II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.13 | 3.31 | ▼ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | • 61% | 62% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 65% | 66% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 21% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | • 78% | 77% | • 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Houston Dynamo FC II 1 - 2 - 2 Minnesota United II. Average goals 3.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Houston Dynamo FC II vs Minnesota United II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Houston Dynamo FC II 0:2 Minnesota United II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Houston Dynamo FC II and Minnesota United II?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Houston Dynamo FC II won 1, Minnesota United II won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Houston Dynamo FC II vs Minnesota United II?
Houston Dynamo FC II score 2.09 goals per game on average and Minnesota United II 1.35. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Houston Dynamo FC II's matches and 57% of Minnesota United II's.
What form are Houston Dynamo FC II and Minnesota United II in?
Over the last 5 games Houston Dynamo FC II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Minnesota United II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Houston Dynamo FC II vs Minnesota United II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Houston Dynamo FC II vs Minnesota United II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


