Houston Dynamo FC II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: match statistics
Houston Dynamo FC II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Houston Dynamo FC II played San Jose Earthquakes II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 19 August 2026. Venue: Aviva Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Houston Dynamo FC II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. San Jose Earthquakes II: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Houston Dynamo FC II scores 2.14 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. San Jose Earthquakes II scores 1.86 and concedes 1.29. League average: 3.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Houston Dynamo FC II 57%, San Jose Earthquakes II 62%. Over 2.5: Houston Dynamo FC II 67%, San Jose Earthquakes II 57%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Houston Dynamo FC II has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.64. Houston Dynamo FC II: 14.3 shots per match, San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.9.
Match halves
Houston Dynamo FC II: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.10. San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Houston Dynamo FC II: 16-30 (12 goals). San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.27 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Houston Dynamo FC II sit 3rd in the home standings and win 80% of their matches at home, while San Jose Earthquakes II win just 27% of their away games. The hosts average 2.5 goals scored per home match, concede just 0.5, and have a +20 goal difference. San Jose concede an average of 1.64 goals away from home, keep a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, and allow opponents an xG of 1.72, which favors Houston’s attack with an xG of 1.73. The visitors’ recent form is particularly poor: they have failed to win any of their last five matches, scoring just 2 goals and averaging 0.4 points per game. Houston are not in perfect rhythm either, but the fact that they keep a clean sheet in 60% of their home matches, combined with a clearly superior shot-conversion rate—17% versus 12%—points to an advantage for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No scenario has a slight edge, primarily due to Houston’s very solid defense, which concedes only 0.78 goals per match on average this season and keeps a clean sheet in 22% of its games. San Jose have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while their run of three defeats and two draws confirms their current finishing problems. The hosts should nevertheless find a way to score, as they average 2.33 goals, while San Jose concede 1.64 goals per match and keep clean sheets in only 9% of their games. Although the visitors have produced a decent xG of 1.84 over the last five rounds, their low actual goal tally and Houston’s season BTTS rate of 44% suggest that at least one side may fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Houston score an average of 2.33 goals at home, while San Jose concede 1.64 goals away from home, so the hosts should have clear potential to score at least one or two goals. At the same time, San Jose have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, an average of 0.4 per game, while Houston’s defence has conceded only 0.78 goals per match throughout the season. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 22% of their matches, while the visitors have failed to score in 18% of games, limiting the chances of a high-scoring response from the away side. Historically, under 3.5 goals has been recorded in 67% of Houston’s matches and 55% of San Jose’s games, despite the league producing a high average of 3.24 goals. The projected total of 2.60 goals points towards the Under 3.5 outcome, as a scenario featuring four or more goals would require a significantly more effective performance from the visitors than their current form suggests.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Houston have been leading at the break in 56% of their matches this season, with that figure rising to 75% over their last five games; San Jose have failed to take the lead at any point during this period. The hosts average 1.33 goals before half-time, compared with just 0.82 for the visitors, while San Jose have not scored a single first-half goal in their last five appearances. Houston’s advantage is also evident over the full match: they win 56% of their games, score an average of 2.33 goals and concede just 0.78, compared with San Jose’s 27% win rate and average of 1.64 goals conceded. After the break, the visitors concede an average of 1.27 goals, making Houston to lead at the break and secure the victory—the 1/1 HT/FT outcome—the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Houston Dynamo FC II | San Jose Earthquakes II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Houston Dynamo FC II is 250% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Houston Dynamo FC II · 0.4 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Houston Dynamo FC II is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
2.14 goals / match - Houston Dynamo FC II · 1.86 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Houston Dynamo FC II is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Houston Dynamo FC II · 1.29 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Houston Dynamo FC II scores in 95% of matches (20 of 21 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).
San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Houston Dynamo FC II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Houston Dynamo FC II
Over / Under - San Jose Earthquakes II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Houston Dynamo FC II is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.95 pts / match - Houston Dynamo FC II · 1.71 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Houston Dynamo FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Houston Dynamo FC II
San Jose Earthquakes II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Houston Dynamo FC II | Liga | San Jose Earthquakes II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.14 | 3.27 | ▼ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 61% | • 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 67% | 66% | ▼ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Houston Dynamo FC II 0 - 0 - 1 San Jose Earthquakes II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Houston Dynamo FC II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Houston Dynamo FC II 1:1 San Jose Earthquakes II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Houston Dynamo FC II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
Houston Dynamo FC II score 2.14 goals per game on average and San Jose Earthquakes II 1.86. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Houston Dynamo FC II's matches and 62% of San Jose Earthquakes II's.
What form are Houston Dynamo FC II and San Jose Earthquakes II in?
Over the last 5 games Houston Dynamo FC II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and San Jose Earthquakes II 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Houston Dynamo FC II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


