Houston Dynamo vs San Diego: match statistics
Houston Dynamo vs San Diego: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Houston Dynamo played San Diego in MLS (United States). The match was played on 23 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Houston Dynamo: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. San Diego: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Houston Dynamo scores 1.57 and concedes 2.29 goals per match. San Diego scores 2.00 and concedes 1.75. League average: 3.29 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Houston Dynamo 57%, San Diego 50%. Over 2.5: Houston Dynamo 57%, San Diego 75%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Houston Dynamo has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.28. Houston Dynamo: 14.6 shots per match, San Diego: 10.6.
Match halves
Houston Dynamo: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14. San Diego: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Houston Dynamo: 61-75 (4 goals). San Diego: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Houston Dynamo appear as favorites: in the last 5 matches the home side scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) while San Diego managed only 5 (1.0 per match). The visitors conceded 15 goals in their last 5 games (3.0 per match) and average 2.5 goals conceded away versus 1.5 conceded by Houston at home. Houston produces a higher home xG (1.50) than San Diego away (1.04) and registers more shots (13.5 vs 8.25) and more shots on target (4.0 vs 3.75), although San Diego has a higher shot conversion (18% vs 9%). Season form favors Houston with 2 wins in the last 5 and 1.2 points per game in that period, while San Diego has 0 wins and only 0.2 PPG, indicating a clear discrepancy in current form. Given superior quality of chances (higher xG and more shots) and San Diego’s weak defense, I project a home win, though the visitors’ high possession (61%) and 18% shot conversion keep the risk of a draw or an away goal.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS at 50% and 60% in the last 5 matches each, while league-wide BTTS occurs in 57% of fixtures — a strong overall signal for "both teams to score". Houston averages 2.5 goals per season, scored 2.0 goals in the last 5 matches and has a recent xG of 1.72, whereas San Diego conceded an average of 3.0 goals in those five matches and has xG against of 2.28, indicating Houston has real chances to score. San Diego averages 1.5 goals seasonally and had 1.0 goal per match in the last 5, and Houston conceded an average of 2.4 goals in that period — suggesting San Diego can also exploit the home side's weaker defense. The counterargument is Houston's seasonal clean sheet rate of 50%, which reduces BTTS probability; however Houston's shooting advantage (13.0 shots and 6.25 on target on average) and the fact both teams have 75% of matches over 2.5 goals push toward both teams scoring. Considering the above figures I assess BTTS at 65% vs 35% and recommend a 'Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total goals at approximately 2.80 (expected_goals_home = 1.59 vs expected_goals_away = 1.21), calculated as the xG average: Houston xG_for 1.51 vs San Diego xG_against 1.67 yields 1.59, and San Diego xG_for 1.04 vs Houston xG_against 1.37 yields 1.21. Season statistics support a high-scoring outcome: Houston has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, San Diego 75% (average 87.5%), both teams have 75% of matches over 2.5, and the league averages 3.18 goals per game. In the last 5 fixtures Houston scores 2.0 goals on average (10 in 5) and concedes 2.4, San Diego scores 1.0 and concedes 3.0, giving a combined average of 3.0 goals – close to my 2.80 estimate. Additionally Houston generates significantly more shots (13.0 vs 8.25) and shots on target (6.25 vs 3.75) with similar conversion (19% vs 18%), which increases the probability of home goals. Consequently the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (high probability), Over 2.5 also has clear support (~76%), while Over 3.5 remains less certain.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Houston is a clear favorite: season averages are 2.5 goals scored at home versus 1.5 for San Diego, xG 1.51 vs 1.04, and average shots 13.0 vs 8.25 with shots on target 6.25 vs 3.75, indicating Houston’s attacking superiority. At Half-Time the hosts average 1.25 goals (scoredAVGHT_home=1.25) and led at the break in 50% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home=50%), while San Diego concedes an average of 2.0 goals by Half-Time (concededAVGHT_away=2.0) and trailed at HT in 50% of fixtures (trailingAtHTPercentage_away=50%). Over the last 5 matches Houston’s HT points per game are 1.6 (last5_HTPPG_overall_home=1.6) versus 0.2 for San Diego (last5_HTPPG_overall_away=0.2), confirming the hosts’ stronger first-half form. Additionally, the home side have a 50% clean sheet rate this season (seasonCSPercentage_home=50%) compared to 25% for the visitors, so holding a lead is realistic despite both teams having BTTS at 50%. For these reasons my preferred selection is 1/1 (Houston leads at Half-Time and wins Full-Time), with lower probability for a draw or a turnaround by San Diego.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Houston Dynamo | San Diego | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Houston Dynamo is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Houston Dynamo · 0.4 pts / match - San Diego
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Diego is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Houston Dynamo · 2 goals / match - San Diego
San Diego is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.29 goals / match - Houston Dynamo · 1.75 goals / match - San Diego
Houston Dynamo scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while San Diego keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).
San Diego scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Houston Dynamo keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Houston Dynamo
Over / Under - San Diego
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Diego is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - Houston Dynamo · 1.63 pts / match - San Diego
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Houston Dynamo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
San Diego - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 38%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 3.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -6 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Houston Dynamo
San Diego
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Houston Dynamo | Liga | San Diego | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.86 | 3.29 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 65% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 23% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Houston Dynamo vs San Diego?
The MLS match finished Houston Dynamo 1:0 San Diego. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Houston Dynamo vs San Diego?
Houston Dynamo score 1.57 goals per game on average and San Diego 2.00. The MLS average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Houston Dynamo's matches and 50% of San Diego's.
What form are Houston Dynamo and San Diego in?
Over the last 5 games Houston Dynamo have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and San Diego 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Houston Dynamo vs San Diego?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Houston Dynamo vs San Diego: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


