Huddersfield Town vs Cardiff City: match statistics
Huddersfield Town vs Cardiff City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Huddersfield Town played Cardiff City in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 14 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Huddersfield Town: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Cardiff City: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Huddersfield Town scores 1.55 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Cardiff City scores 1.85 and concedes 1.02. League average: 2.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Huddersfield Town 60%, Cardiff City 51%. Over 2.5: Huddersfield Town 57%, Cardiff City 54%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Cardiff City has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.45. Huddersfield Town: 12.6 shots per match, Cardiff City: 15.7.
Match halves
Huddersfield Town: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.90. Cardiff City: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.15.
Goals by minute
Huddersfield Town: 76-90+ (18 goals). Cardiff City: 46-60 (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Cardiff to win (2). The visitors hold a clear seasonal advantage: 24 wins versus Huddersfield’s 17, 76 goals scored versus 65 and 42 conceded versus 56 (goal difference +34 vs +9). In their last 5 matches Cardiff averaged 1.6 points per game (record 2-2-1), while Huddersfield averaged only 1.2 points (record 1-3-1), indicating better form for the visitors. Nevertheless, the hosts are dangerous offensively at home: 1.9 goals per game on average, 5.29 shots on target and a high conversion rate of 14% (vs 11% for Cardiff), with home xG of 1.58 against xG conceded 1.17. Cardiff away record shows xG 1.6, they concede on average 1.0 goal and register 14.4 shots overall (4.45 on target), therefore I assign Cardiff a 45% probability, draw 33% and Huddersfield 22%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Huddersfield averages 2.1 goals scored per match this season with xG 1.95 and registers 6.05 shots on target per game, while Cardiff has a season average of 1.6 goals with xG 1.6 and 4.45 shots on target. In the last 5 matches Huddersfield had BTTS in 100% (5/5), scoring an average of 1.8 and conceding 2.0 goals, whereas Cardiff had BTTS in only 20% (1/5), scoring 1.4 and conceding 0.6. xG comparison suggests projected goals around 1.66 for the home side ((1.95+1.36)/2) and 1.38 for the visitors ((1.6+1.16)/2), indicating both teams have a realistic chance to score. Season BTTS rates are 48% for Huddersfield and 55% for Cardiff against a league average of 52%, but the hosts' susceptibility to conceding in the last 5 matches (10 conceded, 2.0 average) increases the probability of an away goal. Considering the strong 100% BTTS signal from the home side, Huddersfield's higher offensive xG (1.95) and the fact that projected goals for both teams exceed 1, I back 'BTTS - Yes' with a probability of 62% vs 38% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data indicate a high goal potential for this match: Huddersfield averages 2.1 goals per game, Cardiff 1.6, giving a seasonal combined 3.7 goals, and cumulative xG is 1.95 (Huddersfield) and 1.6 (Cardiff). After adjusting for opponent xG, I expect about 1.66 xG for Huddersfield and 1.38 xG for Cardiff, a total of 3.04 expected goals. Season percentages of games Over 2.5 are 62% for the home side and 45% for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches Huddersfield have 80% Over 2.5 versus Cardiff’s 20%, which strengthens the Over signal. Additionally, percentages of matches with Both Teams To Score are 48% for the home team and 55% for the away team, and average shots on target 6.05 (home) vs 4.45 (away) suggest a home attacking edge. Consequently I recommend Over at the 2.5 line as the strongest signal (probability ~62%), while Over 1.5 is even more likely (~88%), and Over 3.5 appears less likely (~34%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears most likely: the home side draws at the break in 52% of matches and the visitors in 50%, giving roughly a 51% chance of an HT draw. For full-time, the favourites are the home team — they win 71% of home matches and have the higher xG (1.95 vs Cardiff’s 1.60), which suggests greater ability to create chances and score after the break. Huddersfield averages 6.05 shots on target versus the visitors’ 4.45 and records a higher average of second-half goals (1.9 vs 1.5), so they have the tools to overturn a half-time stalemate. Additionally, second-half goals occur very frequently — 81% of the home side’s matches and 80% of the visitors’ matches feature a goal after the break — therefore an HT draw is often resolved in favour of the stronger side. Consequently, I recommend HT/FT X/1 as the strongest signal (around 29% probability in our model), with 1/1 as the second most likely scenario (~26%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Huddersfield Town | Cardiff City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cardiff City is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Huddersfield Town · 1.6 pts / match - Cardiff City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cardiff City is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.55 goals / match - Huddersfield Town · 1.85 goals / match - Cardiff City
Cardiff City is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Huddersfield Town · 1.02 goals / match - Cardiff City
Huddersfield Town scores in 83% of matches (35 of 42 matches), while Cardiff City keeps a clean sheet in 39% (16 of 41 matches).
Cardiff City scores in 85% of matches (35 of 41 matches), while Huddersfield Town keeps a clean sheet in 29% (12 of 42 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Huddersfield Town
Over / Under - Cardiff City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cardiff City is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Huddersfield Town · 1.46 pts / match - Cardiff City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Huddersfield Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cardiff City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (19 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Huddersfield Town
Cardiff City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Huddersfield Town | Liga | Cardiff City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.88 | 2.59 | ▲ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 52% | • 51% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 51% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 27% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 70% | ▼ 66% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 80% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Huddersfield Town 0 - 0 - 1 Cardiff City. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Huddersfield Town vs Cardiff City?
The EFL League One match finished Huddersfield Town 1:1 Cardiff City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Huddersfield Town vs Cardiff City?
Huddersfield Town score 1.55 goals per game on average and Cardiff City 1.85. The EFL League One average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Huddersfield Town's matches and 51% of Cardiff City's.
What form are Huddersfield Town and Cardiff City in?
Over the last 5 games Huddersfield Town have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Cardiff City 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Huddersfield Town vs Cardiff City?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


