Huddersfield Town vs Wigan Athletic: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Huddersfield Town vs Wigan Athletic: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Huddersfield Town play Wigan Athletic in EFL League One (England). The match date is 24 October 2026. Venue: The John Smith's Stadium.
Current form
Huddersfield Town: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Wigan Athletic: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Huddersfield Town scores 2.00 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Wigan Athletic scores 0.70 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Huddersfield Town 73%, Wigan Athletic 30%. Over 2.5: Huddersfield Town 64%, Wigan Athletic 40%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Huddersfield Town has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.36. Huddersfield Town: 15.8 shots per match, Wigan Athletic: 12.7.
Match halves
Huddersfield Town: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.18. Wigan Athletic: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Huddersfield Town: 0-15 (5 goals). Wigan Athletic: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Huddersfield Town | Wigan Athletic | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Huddersfield Town is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Huddersfield Town · 0.8 pts / match - Wigan Athletic
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Huddersfield Town is 186% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Huddersfield Town · 0.7 goals / match - Wigan Athletic
Huddersfield Town is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.91 goals / match - Huddersfield Town · 1.5 goals / match - Wigan Athletic
Huddersfield Town scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Wigan Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
Wigan Athletic scores in 40% of matches (4 of 10 matches), while Huddersfield Town keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Huddersfield Town
Over / Under - Wigan Athletic
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Huddersfield Town is 139% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.91 pts / match - Huddersfield Town · 0.8 pts / match - Wigan Athletic
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Huddersfield Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wigan Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Huddersfield Town
Wigan Athletic
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Huddersfield Town | Liga | Wigan Athletic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.91 | 2.84 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 57% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 54% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 26% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Huddersfield Town 0 - 1 - 1 Wigan Athletic. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Huddersfield Town and Wigan Athletic play?
Huddersfield Town face Wigan Athletic on 24 October 2026 in EFL League One at The John Smith's Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Huddersfield Town and Wigan Athletic?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Huddersfield Town won 0, Wigan Athletic won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Huddersfield Town vs Wigan Athletic?
Huddersfield Town score 2.00 goals per game on average and Wigan Athletic 0.70. The EFL League One average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Huddersfield Town's matches and 30% of Wigan Athletic's.
What form are Huddersfield Town and Wigan Athletic in?
Over the last 5 games Huddersfield Town have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Wigan Athletic 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Huddersfield Town vs Wigan Athletic?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.