Huntsville City vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics
Huntsville City vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Huntsville City play Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 6 July 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Huntsville City: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Huntsville City scores 1.72 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 1.56 and concedes 1.56. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Huntsville City 56%, Chicago Fire II 67%. Over 2.5: Huntsville City 72%, Chicago Fire II 83%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.36. Huntsville City: 10.8 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 12.4.
Match halves
Huntsville City: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.89. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Huntsville City: 16-30 (6 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 2-1-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 25%.
Match description
Huntsville City holds the advantage in home metrics: at home they average 2.0 goals per game with xG 1.41 and 5.14 shots on target per match, while Chicago Fire II on the road averages 1.0 goal and 4.25 shots on target. The hosts are more efficient — conversion rate for Huntsville is 18% versus 9% for Chicago; hosts also have only 14% of home matches without a goal compared to 25% for the visitors, and 43% clean sheets for Huntsville versus 13% for Chicago. Against this speaks form: Huntsville in the last 5 matches are 0-1-4, scoring 4 and conceding 11 goals, yielding an average of 0.2 points per match in that span, while Chicago are 3-1-1 with 11 goals scored, i.e. 2.0 points per match. Defensively the data is balanced — Huntsville concede 1.71 goals at home with xG against 1.60, and Chicago concede 1.63 on the road with xG against 1.52, so finishing efficiency will be decisive. Considering the higher efficiency and better chance conversion by the hosts and their advantage in shots on target, I give Huntsville a moderate edge, although their poor form reduces the probability of an easy win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Huntsville City | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chicago Fire II is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Huntsville City · 1.6 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Huntsville City is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.72 goals / match - Huntsville City · 1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II
Chicago Fire II is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.94 goals / match - Huntsville City · 1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II
Huntsville City scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
Chicago Fire II scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Huntsville City keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Huntsville City
Over / Under — Chicago Fire II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Huntsville City · 1.56 pts / match - Chicago Fire II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Huntsville City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Huntsville City
Chicago Fire II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Huntsville City | Liga | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.67 | 3.23 | ▼ 3.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 61% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 72% | 65% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 22% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Huntsville City 2 - 1 - 1 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Huntsville City vs Chicago Fire II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Huntsville City 2:2 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Huntsville City and Chicago Fire II?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Huntsville City won 2, Chicago Fire II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Huntsville City vs Chicago Fire II?
Huntsville City score 1.72 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 1.56. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Huntsville City's matches and 67% of Chicago Fire II's.
What form are Huntsville City and Chicago Fire II in?
Over the last 5 games Huntsville City have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Huntsville City vs Chicago Fire II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Huntsville City vs Chicago Fire II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.