Huntsville City vs Connecticut United: match statistics
Huntsville City vs Connecticut United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Huntsville City played Connecticut United in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 31 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Huntsville City: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Connecticut United: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Huntsville City scores 2.09 and concedes 2.36 goals per match. Connecticut United scores 1.30 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.22 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Huntsville City 55%, Connecticut United 70%. Over 2.5: Huntsville City 82%, Connecticut United 70%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Connecticut United has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.34. Huntsville City: 10.6 shots per match, Connecticut United: 13.9.
Match halves
Huntsville City: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.00. Connecticut United: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Huntsville City: 16-30 (5 goals). Connecticut United: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Huntsville City has the home advantage thanks to clear finishing efficiency — the hosts score on average 2.2 goals per home match with 10.4 shots and a 21% conversion rate, while Connecticut United score 1.83 goals away with 14.83 shots and only a 12% conversion. Although the visitors generate higher away xG (1.87 vs. the hosts' 1.31 xG), this does not translate into goals: Huntsville has scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches, Connecticut only 5. Form also favors the hosts — Huntsville has 3 wins in the last 5 matches and averages 1.8 points per match, while Connecticut averages just 0.8 points per match in that period. Defensively Huntsville concedes 1.6 goals at home and has 60% of matches with a clean sheet, while Connecticut concedes 1.83 goals away and has no clean sheets, indicating greater defensive resilience for the hosts. Considering the advantage in shot efficiency (21% vs 12%), superior recent form and defensive stability, I forecast a Huntsville win; estimated probabilities: home 62%, draw 18%, away 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for BTTS - Yes is supported primarily by the very high BTTS rate for the away team: 83% across the season and 60% in the last 5 matches, alongside averages of 1.83 goals scored and 1.83 conceded per game. The home side has only 0.5 goals per game for the season, but in their last 5 matches that has risen to 2.2 scored and 2.0 conceded, increasing the likelihood of goal exchange. xG confirms offensive potential for both teams: home 1.56 xG with 1.04 xG against, away 1.87 xG with 1.17 xG against — both sides generate ~1–1.9 xG and concede over 1.0 xG. Additionally, the away team has 0% clean sheets, the league records 61% BTTS matches and an average of 3.22 goals per game, so indicators point toward both teams scoring; only the low seasonal goal output of the hosts (0.5) limits confidence, hence a 70% vs 30% assessment.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.37 goals for Huntsville and 1.46 for Connecticut (total 2.83), calculated as the average xG for both sides: (xG_for home 1.56 + xG_against away 1.17)/2 ≈1.37 and (xG_for away 1.87 + xG_against home 1.04)/2 ≈1.46. Although Huntsville’s season average is only 0.50 goals per game, they have averaged 2.2 goals in the last 5 matches, while Connecticut has a season scoring rate of 1.83 with xG 1.87, indicating an uptick in the home attack quality and a reliable away offense. Over 2.5 stats show 50% for the home side and 83% for the away side (league 65%), and the home team has Over 2.5 in 80% of their last 5 games, which collectively supports a result above 2.5 goals. Additionally, BTTS is 50% for the home team and 83% for the away team; both teams concede on average 1.75–1.83 goals; shots on target 5.0 (home) vs 6.5 (away) and shooting accuracy 4% vs 12% indicate an away shooting advantage and a likelihood of at least three goals. Therefore I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Connecticut United are the favorites: the visitors have a 50% win rate this season versus 0% for Huntsville City, average 1.83 goals per match versus 0.5 for the hosts, and an xG of 1.87 compared to 1.56 for Huntsville. At Half-Time a draw is more likely, since Huntsville led at the break in 0% of their matches and were level at the break in 75% of games, with average first-half goals of 1.25 for the hosts and 1.67 for the visitors. In the second half Connecticut should assert themselves: they average 6.5 shots on target versus 5.0 and have a conversion rate of 12% versus 4% for Huntsville, which increases the likelihood of goals after the break and a Full-Time victory. Therefore the most probable scenario is a draw at Half-Time and an away win at Full-Time (X/2), with alternatives being an away lead at the break and away win (2/2) or draw at Half-Time and draw at Full-Time (X/X).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Huntsville City | Connecticut United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Huntsville City is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Huntsville City · 0.8 pts / match - Connecticut United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Huntsville City is 61% better for: goals scored per match.
2.09 goals / match - Huntsville City · 1.3 goals / match - Connecticut United
Connecticut United is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.36 goals / match - Huntsville City · 1.8 goals / match - Connecticut United
Huntsville City scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).
Connecticut United scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Huntsville City keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Huntsville City
Over / Under - Connecticut United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Huntsville City is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.73 pts / match - Huntsville City · 1.2 pts / match - Connecticut United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Huntsville City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Connecticut United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Huntsville City
Connecticut United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Huntsville City | Liga | Connecticut United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.45 | 3.22 | ▼ 3.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 62% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 82% | 65% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 22% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Huntsville City vs Connecticut United?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Huntsville City 2:2 Connecticut United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Huntsville City vs Connecticut United?
Huntsville City score 2.09 goals per game on average and Connecticut United 1.30. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Huntsville City's matches and 70% of Connecticut United's.
What form are Huntsville City and Connecticut United in?
Over the last 5 games Huntsville City have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Connecticut United 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Huntsville City vs Connecticut United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


