South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hwaseong play Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Hwaseong: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hwaseong scores 1.53 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hwaseong 53%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Hwaseong 53%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.47. Hwaseong: 11.8 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.

Match halves

Hwaseong: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.88. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Hwaseong: 46-60 (6 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I forecast an away win (Gimpo Citizen). Gimpo sit 5th in the table vs Hwaseong in 10th and have a superior season record (3-2-1 vs Hwaseong 2-2-3). The visitors have scored 8 goals and conceded 5 this season, while the hosts have 6 scored and 7 conceded; in the last 5 matches Gimpo scored 7 goals vs Hwaseong’s 4 and average 1.6 points per game vs 1.0 for the home side. Defensively Gimpo performs better — averaging 0.83 goals conceded away vs 1.0 conceded at home for Hwaseong, and average xG against of 0.98 for Gimpo vs 1.3 for Hwaseong, which suggests the visitors limit opponents’ chances. On the other hand Hwaseong have higher possession (52% vs 47%), more shots (13 vs 12.17) and higher home xG for (1.63 vs 1.57) and a higher clean sheet rate (60% vs 50%), but a conversion rate of 11% vs 9% and the visitors’ better scoring form (7 goals in the last 5) give Gimpo the edge and lead me to back the away side.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
10Shots16
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
4Shots on target6
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.04xG1.64
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
7Corners6
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
16Dangerous attacks28
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
14Fouls11
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
3Cards2
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.53Goals scored / match1.18
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.12Goals conceded / match1.12
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
47%Average possession50%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
4.59Shots on target / match4
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.76Shots per match12.29
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
4.59Shots on target4
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
13%Shot conversion9.6%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
47%Possession50%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.47xG for1.52
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.34xG against1.27
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Hwaseong: Counter-attackingGimpo Citizen: Balanced
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hwaseong is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Hwaseong · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong
WWLLW
Season result split
47% W24% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hwaseong is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.18 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

26Goals scored (season)20
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
19Goals conceded (season)19
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
2.65Average goals in match2.29
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
10Goals scored (last 5)5
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal76%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
53%2 goals29%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
18%3 goals12%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal71%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
41%2 goals35%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
6%3 goals6%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time29%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
6%BTTS in both halves6%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
35%Scored in both halves24%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
60%BTTS - last 560%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hwaseong is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Hwaseong · 1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong - half-time state
41% leading24% draw35% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.24
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.53
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.06
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
47%No goal before half-time59%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.82Points per match (2nd half)1.59
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.24
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
53%Clean sheet after half-time59%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
35%No goal after half-time41%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Hwaseong - second-half results

47% W41% R12% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hwaseong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

HwaseongLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.652.75 2.29
Both teams scored 53%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 35%
Clean sheets 35%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 88%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Hwaseong 0 - 0 - 3 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Gimpo Citizen FC
5 : 1
Hwaseong FC
Hwaseong FC
0 : 1
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
1 : 0
Hwaseong FC

FAQ

What was the result of Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 2:2 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 0, Gimpo Citizen won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen?

Hwaseong score 1.53 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Hwaseong's matches and 53% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Hwaseong and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen?

The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.