South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 13 September 2026

Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hwaseong played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Hwaseong: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hwaseong scores 0.86 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.33 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.77 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hwaseong 29%, Gimpo Citizen 33%. Over 2.5: Hwaseong 29%, Gimpo Citizen 33%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.49. Hwaseong: 11.7 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.2.

Match halves

Hwaseong: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.57. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Hwaseong: 46-60 (3 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.77 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I forecast an away win (Gimpo Citizen). Gimpo sit 5th in the table vs Hwaseong in 10th and have a superior season record (3-2-1 vs Hwaseong 2-2-3). The visitors have scored 8 goals and conceded 5 this season, while the hosts have 6 scored and 7 conceded; in the last 5 matches Gimpo scored 7 goals vs Hwaseong’s 4 and average 1.6 points per game vs 1.0 for the home side. Defensively Gimpo performs better — averaging 0.83 goals conceded away vs 1.0 conceded at home for Hwaseong, and average xG against of 0.98 for Gimpo vs 1.3 for Hwaseong, which suggests the visitors limit opponents’ chances. On the other hand Hwaseong have higher possession (52% vs 47%), more shots (13 vs 12.17) and higher home xG for (1.63 vs 1.57) and a higher clean sheet rate (60% vs 50%), but a conversion rate of 11% vs 9% and the visitors’ better scoring form (7 goals in the last 5) give Gimpo the edge and lead me to back the away side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back 'No' — I assess the probability of both teams failing to score at 60% vs 40% for 'BTTS - Yes'. Gimpo Citizen averages 1.33 goals scored and concedes only 0.83 per match this season, with a 50% clean sheet rate and season totals of 8 goals for and 5 against, which strongly favors their defense. Hwaseong has 6 goals scored and 7 conceded this season, averaging 0.8 goals for and 1.2 conceded in the last 5 matches (4 scored, 6 conceded); despite a recent xG_for of 1.61, this indicates poor conversion of created chances. Both teams have had BTTS in 40% of their last 5 matches each, and although the league average BTTS is 63%, the individual indicators (Gimpo’s recent xG_against 0.79 and 50% clean sheets vs Hwaseong’s weak finishing) support a No Goal / clean sheet expected scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Analysis based on the last 5 matches: xG Hwaseong = 1.61 and xG Gimpo = 1.34, with xG against 1.35 (Hwaseong) and 0.79 (Gimpo), yielding expected goals of ~1.20 for the home side and ~1.35 for the away side (total ~2.55). Gimpo averages 1.33 goals scored this season with seasonal xG 1.57 and averages 12.17 shots and 4.83 on target, so they generate the majority of goal-scoring opportunities. Hwaseong’s seasonal data is fragmentary (seasonScoredAVG_home = 0.0), therefore I place greater weight on the last 5 matches, where they scored 4 goals (0.8 average) with xG 1.61. Compared to the league average of 2.86, the expected total of 2.55 suggests an edge toward Over; the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (approx. 90%), while Over 2.5 is only slightly favored (~52%) and Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~18%). Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the best line — the high combined xG and Gimpo’s offensive activity increase the probability of exceeding that threshold.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Gimpo averages 1.33 goals scored per match this season versus 0.0 for Hwaseong; the away xG is 1.57 compared to 0.0 for the home side, indicating a clear offensive edge for the visitors. The visitors draw at the break in 83% of away matches and score on average 0.5 goals by half-time while conceding 0.33, so the most likely half-time state is a draw. In the second half Gimpo averages 0.83 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, and 83% of their away matches featured at least one goal after the break, which raises the likelihood of a decisive post-break goal. Additionally, the visitors win 50% of away matches and keep clean sheets in 50% of fixtures this season, while the hosts have no goal output in the data; therefore the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a Gimpo victory at full-time (HT/FT: draw/Gimpo).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
10Shots16
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
4Shots on target6
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.04xG1.64
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
7Corners6
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
16Dangerous attacks28
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
14Fouls11
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
3Cards2
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.86Goals scored / match1.33
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1Goals conceded / match0.83
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
51%Average possession47%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
3.86Shots on target / match4.83
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.71Shots per match12.17
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
3.86Shots on target4.83
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
7.3%Shot conversion11%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
51%Possession47%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.49xG for1.57
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.22xG against0.98
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Hwaseong: BalancedGimpo Citizen: Balanced
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimpo Citizen is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Hwaseong · 1.6 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong
DDLLW
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Gimpo Citizen
WLDDW
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.33 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Hwaseong · 0.83 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong scoring profile: mixed

Hwaseong scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: mixed

Gimpo Citizen scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

6Goals scored (season)8
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
7Goals conceded (season)5
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1.86Average goals in match2.17
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
4Goals scored (last 5)7
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal67%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
29%2 goals33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%3 goals33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal50%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
29%2 goals17%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
14%3 goals17%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves17%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
14%Scored in both halves33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
40%BTTS - last 540%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

2nd half

43%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Hwaseong · 1.33 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Hwaseong - half-time state
29% leading14% draw57% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
17% leading83% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.33
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.5
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
1Average goals (1st half)0.83
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
43%Clean sheet before half-time67%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
71%No goal before half-time67%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.83
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.33
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
71%Clean sheet after half-time67%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen
57%No goal after half-time33%
HwaseongGimpo Citizen

Hwaseong - second-half results

29% W71% D0% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

50% W33% D17% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hwaseong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.01
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
73%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

HwaseongLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 1.862.77 2.17
Both teams scored 29%61% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%56% 33%
Clean sheets 43%23% 50%
Goal before half-time 86%79% 33%
Goal after half-time 43%73% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.77
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimpo CitizenGoalDong-Jin Park
  2. HwaseongYellow cardJae-Min Jegal
  3. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardConnor Edward Chapman
  4. HwaseongYellow cardSava Petrov
  5. HwaseongGoalMin-Jun JangAssist: Leonard Pllana
  6. HwaseongYellow cardMin-Jun Jang
  7. HwaseongGoalDae-Hwan KimAssist: Leonard Pllana
  8. HwaseongSubstitutionOn: Si-Hoo YangOff: Sun-Woo Ham
  9. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardTae-Han Kim
  10. Gimpo CitizenGoalLuis Fabián Mina Zapata

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Hwaseong 0 - 0 - 3 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Gimpo Citizen FC
5 : 1
Hwaseong FC
Hwaseong FC
0 : 1
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
1 : 0
Hwaseong FC

FAQ

What was the result of Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 2:2 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 0, Gimpo Citizen won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen?

Hwaseong score 0.86 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.33. The K League 2 average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Hwaseong's matches and 33% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Hwaseong and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen?

The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.