Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam: match statistics
Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hwaseong played Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 31 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Hwaseong: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Gyeongnam: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hwaseong scores 1.46 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Gyeongnam scores 1.25 and concedes 1.58. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hwaseong 54%, Gyeongnam 67%. Over 2.5: Hwaseong 46%, Gyeongnam 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Hwaseong has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.17. Hwaseong: 11.3 shots per match, Gyeongnam: 9.9.
Match halves
Hwaseong: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.92. Gyeongnam: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Hwaseong: 46-60 (5 goals). Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win. Hwaseong sit 4th and have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, scoring 11 goals and averaging 2.6 points per match, while Gyeongnam (11th) over the same period have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 9 goals and 2.0 points per match. Hwaseong create clearly more chances — at home they average 5.11 shots on target and 12.89 shots overall per match versus 3 on target and 10.8 shots per match for the visitors, with a conversion rate of 12% compared to Gyeongnam’s 9%. Defensively the hosts are more stable: Hwaseong concede 1.11 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 44% of games, while Gyeongnam concede 1.4 goals away and have 0% clean sheets on the road. The differences in chance quality are confirmed by xG — Hwaseong’s average home xG is 1.58 versus 1.25 xG for Gyeongnam away; additionally the visitors fail to score in 40% of their away matches, while the hosts fail to score in only 11% of home games. Considering superior shot metrics, higher xG, lower share of matches without scoring and a better recent 5-game record, I assess probabilities at approximately 60% for the home side, 25% for a draw and 15% for the away side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario of both teams scoring is more likely: seasonally Hwaseong has BTTS 71%, Gyeongnam 60%, and the league average is 62%. In the last 5 matches both teams show BTTS 80%; in that period Hwaseong scored 11 and conceded 6 goals (averages 2.2 and 1.2), while Gyeongnam scored 9 and conceded 8 (1.8 and 1.6). xG indicates Hwaseong generates 1.1 xG and allows 1.2 xG, and Gyeongnam 1.25 xG and allows 1.31 xG, suggesting an exchange of chances at both ends. Additionally Gyeongnam has no clean sheets this season (0%), and Hwaseong only 14%, so the probability that either team fails to score is low. Considering the high seasonal and recent BTTS rates (71%/60% and 80%/80%), low CS (14%/0%) and xG ~1.1–1.31, I assess the chance of BTTS at 75% and recommend a 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes) bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects 1.21 expected goals for Hwaseong and 1.23 for Gyeongnam (total 2.44), calculated as the average of home attack xG 1.10 and away defense xG 1.31 and vice versa (1.25 and 1.20). With a combined λ=2.44 the Poisson distribution indicates roughly a 70% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), and seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 71% for the home side and 80% for the away side — therefore I assess Over 1.5 at 72%. Over 2.5 is more balanced: Poisson gives ≈44% for ≥3 goals, seasonal figures are 71% (Hwaseong) vs 20% (Gyeongnam), although in the last 5 matches both teams recorded Over 2.5 in 60% of games. Over 3.5 is unlikely (Poisson ≈23%), consistent with seasonal Over 3.5 of 43%/20%, hence Under 3.5 at 77% is justified. The best betting signal is Over 1.5 — expected total 2.44, high BTTS incidence 71%/60% and dominant seasonal Over1.5 rates (71%/80%) provide the strongest and most consistent argument.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches Hwaseong was level at half-time in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and leading in 40% (2 of 5), and never trailing at half-time (0%), which makes scenarios that start with the away side leading at the break unlikely. The home team are in better form — they have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) versus 3 of 5 for the visitors (60%) — and seasonally Hwaseong average 1.43 goals scored and 1.71 conceded, while Gyeongnam average 1.0 scored and 1.4 conceded. At half-time the hosts have averaged 1.0 goals in the last 5 matches versus 0.6 for the visitors, and although the visitors’ xG is 1.25 compared to the hosts’ 1.1, Hwaseong’s higher shot conversion rate (15% vs 9%) suggests the hosts convert chances into goals more often. On this basis the strongest signal is a half-time draw and home win at full-time (X/1) — I assign it 30%; very close is the 1/1 scenario with 28% because the hosts lead at the break in 40% of cases and have good finishing over the full match. I also allocate 15% to X/X (draw/draw) and 15% to X/2 (draw at HT and away win), while scenarios beginning with the away team leading are essentially marginal (2/* = 0%) given the hosts’ 0% rate of trailing at half-time in the last 5 matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hwaseong | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hwaseong is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Hwaseong · 2 pts / match - Gyeongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hwaseong is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.46 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.25 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Hwaseong is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.15 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.58 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Hwaseong scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).
Gyeongnam scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hwaseong
Over / Under - Gyeongnam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hwaseong is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / match - Hwaseong · 0.92 pts / match - Gyeongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hwaseong - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hwaseong
Gyeongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Hwaseong | Liga | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.62 | 2.72 | ▲ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 24% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 74% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Hwaseong 1 - 1 - 1 Gyeongnam. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 2:0 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Gyeongnam?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 1, Gyeongnam won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam?
Hwaseong score 1.46 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.25. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Hwaseong's matches and 67% of Gyeongnam's.
What form are Hwaseong and Gyeongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Gyeongnam 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam?
The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


