South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen: match statistics

Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen

Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hwaseong played Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Hwaseong: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Paju Citizen: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hwaseong scores 1.47 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hwaseong 53%, Paju Citizen 47%. Over 2.5: Hwaseong 47%, Paju Citizen 47%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Hwaseong has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.28. Hwaseong: 11.5 shots per match, Paju Citizen: 10.0.

Match halves

Hwaseong: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.87. Paju Citizen: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Hwaseong: 16-30 (5 goals). Paju Citizen: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Hwaseong holds a clear advantage in form and attack: in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (10 points, PPG 2.0) and have scored 10 goals, whereas Paju in their last 5 have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (PPG 0.2) with only 1 goal scored. At home Hwaseong averages 1.55 goals, 12.82 shots and 4.91 shots on target per match with a 12% conversion rate, while Paju away averages 1.00 goal, 11.71 shots and 4.0 shots on target with only 9% conversion and 29% of matches without a goal. Additionally, hosts concede 1.09 goals at home with opposing xG 1.38, whereas Paju concede 1.57 goals away with opposing xG 1.74, suggesting greater vulnerability of the visitors to conceding. The positional gap (6 vs 13), season goal difference 22:15 and higher clean sheet rate for the hosts (45% vs 29%) confirm Hwaseong’s superiority. Based on this I project a home win probability of ~65%, draw 20% and Paju win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The analysis favors BTTS - Yes. The league has a high BTTS rate of 63% and Paju’s season BTTS is 57% versus Hwaseong’s 38%. Hwaseong compensates with current form — BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and an average of 2.0 goals scored, while Paju has 20% BTTS and only 0.2 goals in that period. Both teams have very similar recent xG: Hwaseong 1.48 xG vs Paju 1.46 xG, and both concede on average 1.4 goals over the last 5 matches, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Paju creates more chances (11.7 shots and 4.0 on target per match vs 8.5 and 3.0 for Hwaseong), and the low clean sheet percentages (25% and 29%) together with season averages of goals conceded (1.25 and 1.57) support the scenario that both teams can score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model projects 1.41 xG for Hwaseong and 1.42 xG for Paju, totaling 2.83 expected goals for the match. With λ=2.83 the Poisson distribution implies ~77% probability of Over 1.5 goals, ~54% for Over 2.5 and ~32% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is for Over 1.5. Shot statistics support an attacking profile: Paju averages 11.71 shots (4.0 on target) and Hwaseong 8.5 (3.0 on target), with conversion rates of 12% for Hwaseong and 9% for Paju. Season rates for Over 2.5 are 57% for Paju and 38% for Hwaseong; BTTS is 57% for Paju and 38% for Hwaseong; in the last 5 matches Hwaseong scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) versus Paju’s 1 goal (0.2). Given the expected 2.83 goals—slightly above the league average of 2.78—and the shot and xG concentration, I recommend backing Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Hwaseong leading at Half-Time and ultimately winning the match (1/1) — I assign this a 48% probability. In their last five matches Hwaseong led at the break in 60% of games (3 of 5) and scored a total of 9 first-half goals (1.8 on average), while Paju Citizen scored only 1 first-half goal in those five matches (0.2 on average). Seasonally the home side have kept a clean sheet at Half-Time in 75% of matches, and the visitors concede an average of 0.71 goals by the break, which increases the likelihood Hwaseong will hold the lead after 45 minutes. For Full-Time the form and recent record favor the hosts — Hwaseong have won 60% of their last five fixtures, while Paju have not won any of their last five (0%) — therefore the scenario where the match is level at Half-Time but the hosts turn it around to win (X/1) is my second most likely outcome (20%). Although Paju register a higher average xG (1.52 versus the home side’s 1.07), their weak Half-Time performance and overall inefficiency in recent games make a visitor turnaround unlikely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
HwaseongPaju Citizen
16Shots10
HwaseongPaju Citizen
6Shots on target3
HwaseongPaju Citizen
2.06xG1.14
HwaseongPaju Citizen
12Corners2
HwaseongPaju Citizen
88Dangerous attacks40
HwaseongPaju Citizen
5Fouls6
HwaseongPaju Citizen
2Cards0
HwaseongPaju Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

HwaseongPaju Citizen
1.47Goals scored / match1
HwaseongPaju Citizen
1.13Goals conceded / match1.4
HwaseongPaju Citizen
47%Average possession44%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
4.33Shots on target / match3.47
HwaseongPaju Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.47Shots per match10
HwaseongPaju Citizen
4.33Shots on target3.47
HwaseongPaju Citizen
12.8%Shot conversion10%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
47%Possession44%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
1.43xG for1.28
HwaseongPaju Citizen
1.38xG against1.51
HwaseongPaju Citizen

Shooting quality

Hwaseong: Counter-attackingPaju Citizen: Balanced
HwaseongPaju Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hwaseong is 900% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Hwaseong · 0.2 pts / match - Paju Citizen

Hwaseong
DWWWL
Season result split
47% W27% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-4
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Paju Citizen
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W13% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-9
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hwaseong is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1 goals / match - Paju Citizen

Hwaseong is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.4 goals / match - Paju Citizen

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

Paju Citizen scoring profile: strong

Paju Citizen scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

22Goals scored (season)15
HwaseongPaju Citizen
17Goals conceded (season)21
HwaseongPaju Citizen
2.6Average goals in match2.4
HwaseongPaju Citizen
10Goals scored (last 5)1
HwaseongPaju Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
HwaseongPaju Citizen

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
53%2 goals33%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
13%3 goals7%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal73%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
40%2 goals33%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
7%3 goals27%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
0%4 goals7%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time33%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
7%BTTS in both halves7%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
33%Scored in both halves20%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
80%BTTS - last 520%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hwaseong is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Hwaseong · 1.4 pts / match - Paju Citizen

Hwaseong - half-time state
40% leading27% draw33% trailing
Paju Citizen - half-time state
27% leading60% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.4
HwaseongPaju Citizen
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.6
HwaseongPaju Citizen
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
HwaseongPaju Citizen
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.07
HwaseongPaju Citizen
53%Clean sheet before half-time60%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
47%No goal before half-time53%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)0.87
HwaseongPaju Citizen
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
HwaseongPaju Citizen
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
HwaseongPaju Citizen
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.33
HwaseongPaju Citizen
53%Clean sheet after half-time40%
HwaseongPaju Citizen
40%No goal after half-time67%
HwaseongPaju Citizen

Hwaseong - second-half results

47% W40% R13% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paju Citizen - second-half results

20% W27% R53% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hwaseong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.20
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

HwaseongLigaPaju Citizen
Average goals in match 2.602.78 2.40
Both teams scored 53%62% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%57% 47%
Clean sheets 33%23% 27%
Goal before half-time 87%72% 53%
Goal after half-time 73%76% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Paju CitizenGoalJafar AriasAssist: Won-Woo Ryu
  2. HwaseongYellow cardJun-seo Park
  3. HwaseongYellow cardKyung-Min Park
  4. Paju CitizenGoalBorja González TomásAssist: Joon-Suk Lee
  5. HwaseongSubstitutionOn: Seung-Beom SonOff: Leonard Pllana
  6. HwaseongGoalMyung-Hee Choi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 1:2 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen?

Hwaseong score 1.47 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Hwaseong's matches and 47% of Paju Citizen's.

What form are Hwaseong and Paju Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Paju Citizen 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen?

The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.