Hwaseong vs Seongnam: match statistics
Hwaseong vs Seongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hwaseong played Seongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Hwaseong: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Seongnam: 1-3-0, 1.50 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hwaseong scores 0.80 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Seongnam scores 1.25 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hwaseong 20%, Seongnam 75%. Over 2.5: Hwaseong 20%, Seongnam 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Hwaseong has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.07. Hwaseong: 11.0 shots per match, Seongnam: 6.8.
Match halves
Hwaseong: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Seongnam: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Hwaseong: 46-60 (2 goals). Seongnam: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hwaseong holds a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 12.67 shots and 4.33 on target per match versus Seongnam’s 4 shots and 2 on target away. This translates into xG – home side’s average xG at home is 1.53 compared to 0.77 xG for Seongnam away, indicating nearly double the quality of created opportunities. Defensively the hosts concede just 0.67 goals per home match on average and keep a clean sheet in 67% of games, while Seongnam concedes 1.00 goal on average away and has yet to record an away clean sheet (0%). The visitors, however, are efficient with fewer attempts (25% conversion rate and 1.00 goal per away match on average) and have better recent point form (1.4 points per match in the last 5 vs 1.0 for the hosts), which increases the likelihood of a draw. Considering the hosts’ superiority in shot volume, higher xG (1.53 vs 0.77) and stronger home defence, I predict a Hwaseong win, although a draw remains realistic given Seongnam’s effectiveness.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seongnam has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100%, Hwaseong 67%, and the league average is 63%, which seasonally strongly supports a both teams to score scenario. Visitors have not kept a clean sheet yet (0%), while Hwaseong have 33% clean sheets at home, so the risk that Seongnam scores is high despite hosts occasionally holding goalless matches. However, recent form reduces confidence: in the last 5 matches Hwaseong have only 20% BTTS vs 60% for Seongnam, meaning the hosts’ recent form (only 1 of 5 matches with both teams scoring) lowers conviction, but the visitors still show a tendency for goal-scoring games. Offensive arguments favor BTTS: last 5 games show xG 1.29 for Hwaseong and 1.04 for Seongnam, with xG against of 1.15 and 1.06 respectively, and combined with shot conversion rates of 17% (home) and 25% (away) this indicates both teams generate and convert chances. Considering seasonal 100% Seongnam, 67% Hwaseong and league 63%, together with the visitors’ lack of clean sheets, the 'both teams to score' pick appears the strongest signal; I suggest BTTS - Yes with a probability of 75%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and average goals analysis points to a moderate scoring outcome: home xG 1.17 vs opponents’ xG conceded 1.14 yields expected goals for Hwaseong of ~1.16, while away xG 0.77 vs hosts’ xG conceded 1.09 yields Seongnam ~0.93, total ~2.09. Seasonally Hwaseong have 67% of matches Over 1.5, Seongnam 100% — arithmetic mean 83.5% (rounded to 84%), therefore Over 1.5 has a clear edge. The 2.5 line is less convincing: seasonal Over 2.5 is 67% for hosts and 0% for guests (average 33.5%, rounded to 34%), and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 is 20% for Hwaseong and 40% for Seongnam (average 30%), so Over 2.5 is much less likely. Additionally, both-teams-to-score rates are 67% for hosts and 100% for guests, and hosts average 7.67 shots with 2.33 on target vs guests 4.0 and 2.0, which increases the chance of at least two goals. I therefore recommend betting Over 1.5 (line 1.5) with expected goals of ~1.16 for the home side and ~0.93 for the away side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hwaseong led at half-time in 67% of matches (leadingAtHT_home = 67%) and averages 1.0 goal before the break with 0.33 conceded (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.0, concededAVGHT_home = 0.33), which strongly favors the home side at HT. Seongnam have not led at half-time on the road (leadingAtHT_away = 0%) and record 100% draws at the break (drawingAtHT_away = 100%), so the probability of Hwaseong holding a lead after 45 minutes is high. Nevertheless, matches involving both teams often finish level at full-time (drawPercentage_home = 67%, drawPercentage_away = 100%) and the home side concedes on average 0.67 goals after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_home = 0.67), which increases the chance of a turnaround to a draw. Additionally, xG and chance metrics favor the hosts (xG 1.17 vs 0.77, shotsAVG 7.67 vs 4.0), while the visitors have a higher finishing efficiency (shot_conversion_rate_away 25% vs 17%), so the strongest scenario I select is the home side leading at half-time and the match finishing level (1/X).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hwaseong | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seongnam is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Hwaseong · 1.5 pts / match - Seongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seongnam is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.25 goals / match - Seongnam
Hwaseong is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.8 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1 goals / match - Seongnam
Hwaseong scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Seongnam scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hwaseong
Over / Under - Seongnam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seongnam is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / match - Hwaseong · 2 pts / match - Seongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hwaseong - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hwaseong
Seongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Hwaseong | Liga | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.60 | 2.86 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 23% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 80% | 86% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 40% | 69% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Hwaseong 1 - 0 - 2 Seongnam. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hwaseong vs Seongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 1:3 Seongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Seongnam?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 1, Seongnam won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Seongnam?
Hwaseong score 0.80 goals per game on average and Seongnam 1.25. The K League 2 average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Hwaseong's matches and 75% of Seongnam's.
What form are Hwaseong and Seongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Seongnam 1-3-0 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Seongnam?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hwaseong vs Seongnam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


