Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics
Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hwaseong played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 7 August 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Hwaseong: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hwaseong scores 1.79 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.89 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hwaseong 58%, Seoul E-Land 68%. Over 2.5: Hwaseong 58%, Seoul E-Land 79%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.49. Hwaseong: 11.8 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 13.3.
Match halves
Hwaseong: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.95. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.26.
Goals by minute
Hwaseong: 31-45+ (8 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hwaseong are in excellent current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches while remaining unbeaten, scoring as many as 18 goals during that run. At home, the hosts average 1.86 goals per match with a 15% shooting conversion rate, and have failed to score in just 7% of their fixtures; Seoul E-Land have a 20% figure away from home. The visitors sit higher in 2nd place and are slightly better at creating away chances, with an xG of 1.62 compared with Hwaseong’s 1.55, while also winning 60% of their matches on the road. However, Seoul E-Land’s defence concedes an average of 1.10 goals away from home, while the in-form hosts have scored 18 goals in their last five matches. Home advantage and Hwaseong’s clearly superior current momentum give them a slight edge, although the closely matched metrics of both teams also increase the likelihood of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data clearly favors goals from both sides: BTTS occurred in 78% of Hwaseong matches and 60% of Seoul E-Land matches, compared with the league average of 64%. The signal is even stronger across the last five matches, with Hwaseong recording BTTS in 80% of games and Seoul E-Land in as many as 100%. During this period, the hosts averaged 3.6 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while the visitors scored 2.6 and conceded 2.2 goals per match. The attacking potential is supported by similar xG figures from the last five outings: 1.55 for Hwaseong and 1.83 for Seoul E-Land, alongside high opponents’ xG values of 1.79 and 1.57, respectively. A scenario in which one team fails to score is less likely, especially since Hwaseong have failed to score in none of their league matches this season, while clean sheets for both teams have occurred in only 22% and 30% of matches. Therefore, BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal) is the preferred selection over BTTS - No (No Goal), which means that at least one team fails to score—not automatically a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither team scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams are in excellent attacking form: Hwaseong have averaged 3.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Seoul E-Land have averaged 2.6. At the same time, the hosts conceded 1.8 goals per match during this period, compared with as many as 2.2 for the visitors, clearly supporting an open game. Across the season, at least 2 goals were scored in 89% of Hwaseong matches and 80% of Seoul E-Land matches, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 89% and 70%, respectively. Their chance-creation potential is comparable, with both teams posting an average xG of 1.62, while each side records more than 5 shots on target per match. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: even with a more conservative adjustment for the high recent finishing efficiency, the data for both teams points to a high probability of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hwaseong have a clear advantage in opening periods: they were leading at half-time in 56% of their matches this season and in as many as 80% of their last five, scoring an average of 1.8 goals before the break during that span. Seoul E-Land were ahead after 45 minutes in only 10% of matches and failed to lead at half-time in any of their last five, averaging just 0.4 goals in the first half. The hosts are also highly reliable defensively before the break, conceding an average of 0.44 goals, and only 0.2 across their last five appearances. After the interval, the visitors are more dangerous, scoring an average of 1.3 goals, so turnaround scenarios remain a significant possibility. Nevertheless, Hwaseong won 80% of their last five matches, while their 16% finishing efficiency compared with the opponent's 13% supports the HT/FT 1/1 scenario, with the hosts taking the lead at the break and maintaining their winning position until full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hwaseong | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seoul E-Land is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Hwaseong · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.89 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Hwaseong is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - Hwaseong · 1.32 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Hwaseong scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).
Seoul E-Land scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hwaseong
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hwaseong is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - Hwaseong · 1.42 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hwaseong - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hwaseong
Seoul E-Land
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Hwaseong | Liga | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.95 | 2.82 | ▲ 3.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 64% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 56% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 22% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 78% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Hwaseong 1 - 2 - 1 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land?
The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 0:0 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Seoul E-Land?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 1, Seoul E-Land won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land?
Hwaseong score 1.79 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.89. The K League 2 average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Hwaseong's matches and 68% of Seoul E-Land's.
What form are Hwaseong and Seoul E-Land in?
Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


